Satellite gradiometry
Part B
First Online:
Keywords
Gravity Field Free Fall Gravity Gradient Proof Mass Angular Velocity Vector
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature
- Baarda, W.: Statistical Concepts in Geodesy, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, New Series, 2, 4, Delft, 1967.Google Scholar
- Bauer, H.F. Environmental Effects on Micro-Gravity Experiments, Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforsch., 6, 3, 184–194, 1982.Google Scholar
- Betti, B., F. Sansó: A Possible Use of the Results of Hipparcos Project in Satellite to Satellite Tracking, manuscripta geodaetica, 1986 (in print).Google Scholar
- Bocchio, F.: Geodetic Singularities, Rev. Geoph. Space Physics, 20, 3, 399–409, 1982.Google Scholar
- Brouwer, D., G.M. Clemence, Clemence, Celestical Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J.J., P.H. Savet: Gravity Difference Detection, Aero/Space Engineering, 44–47, 1959.Google Scholar
- Colombo, O.L.: Numerical Methods for Harmonic Analysis on the Sphere, Dept. Geodetic Science, 310, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1981.Google Scholar
- Colombo, O.L.: The Global Mapping of Gravity with Two Satellites, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, New Series, 7, 3, 1984.Google Scholar
- Dermanis, A., E. Liveratos: Applications of Deformation Analysis in Geodesy and Geodynamics, Rev. Geophys. Space. Physics, 21, 1, 41–50, 1983.Google Scholar
- Forward, R.L.: Gravity Sensors and the Principle of Equivalence, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-17, 4, 511–519, 1981.Google Scholar
- Forward, R.L.: Flattening Spacetime Near the Earth, physical review D, 26, 4, 735–744, 1982.Google Scholar
- Grafarend, E.: The Bruns Transformation and a Dual Set-up of Geodetic Observational Equations, U.S. Dept. Commerce, NOAA-NGS, Rockville, Md., 1979.Google Scholar
- Heck, B.: On Various Formulations of the Geodetic Boundary Value Problem Using the Vertical Gradient of Gravity, in: proc. Intern. Symp. “Figure of the Earth, the Moon and Other Planets”, Prague, 1982.Google Scholar
- Heiskanen, W., H. Moritz: Physical Geodesy, Freeman & Comp., San Francisco, 1967.Google Scholar
- Heitz, S.: Mechanik fester Körper, Band 1, Dümmler, Bonn, 1980.Google Scholar
- Ilk, K.H.: On the Dynamics of a System of Rigid Bodies, manuscripta geodaetica, 8, 2, 139–198, 1983a.Google Scholar
- Ilk, K.H.: Ein Beitrag zur Dynamik ausgedehnter Körper, Gravitationswechselwirkung, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, C-288, München, 1983b.Google Scholar
- Jung, K.: Schwerkraftverfahren in der Angewandten Geophysik, Akademische Verlagsgesellschft, Leipzig, 1961.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, M.: Modern Spacecraft Dynamics & Control, John Wiley, & Sons, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
- Krarup, T.: Letters on Molodensky's Problem, I–IV, Communication to the members of IAG-special study group 4.31, 1973.Google Scholar
- Marussi, A.: The Tidal Field of a Planet and the Related Intrinsic Reference Systems, Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc., 56, 409–417, 1979.Google Scholar
- Marussi, A.: Microgravitation in Space, Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc., 76, 691–695, 1984.Google Scholar
- Marussi, A., Cl. Chiaruttini: The Motion of a Free Particle and of a Spherical Pendulum in the Microgravitational Field of a Gravitationally Stabilized Satellite in a Circular Orbit in a Central Field, in: Marussi, A.: Intrinsic Geodesy, 179–189, Springer, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar
- Misner, Ch.W., K.S. Thorne, J.A. Wheeler: Gravitation, Freeman and Comp., San Francisco, 1970.Google Scholar
- Moritz, H.: Kinematical Geodesy, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission A-59, München, 1968.Google Scholar
- Moritz, H.: Advanced Physical Geodesy, Wichmann, Karlsruhe, 1980.Google Scholar
- Mortiz, H.: Variational Methods in Earth Rotation, in: Geodesy and Geodynamics, eds.: Moritz, H. & H. Sünkel, 167–226, Graz, 1982.Google Scholar
- Moritz, H.: Inertia and Gravitation in Geodesy, in: proc. of the 3rd Intern. Symposium on Inertial Technology for Surveying and Geodesy, vol. I, Banff, 1986.Google Scholar
- Olsen, R.E., J. Mockovciak, Jr.: Operational Factors Affecting Microgravity Levels in Orbit, Journ. Spacecraft, 18, 2, 141–144, 1981.Google Scholar
- Pelka, E.J., D.B. De Bra: The Effects of Relative Instrument Orientation upon Gravity Gradiometer System Performance, J. Guidance and Control, 2, 1, 18–24, 1979.Google Scholar
- Reed, G.B.: Application of Kinematical Geodesy for Determining the Short Wave Length Components of the Gravity Field by Satellite Gradiometry, Dept. Geodetic Science, 201, The Ohio State University, 1973.Google Scholar
- Reinhardt, V.S., F.O. Vonbun, J.P. Turneaure: A Supersensitive Accelerometer for Spacecraft Gradiometry, proc.: IEEE Position Location and Navigation Symposium, Atlantic City, 1982.Google Scholar
- Roberson, R.E.: Gravitational Torque on a Satellite Vehicle, Journ. Franklin Inst., 265, 1, 13–22, 1958.Google Scholar
- Rummel, R., P.J.G. Teunissen: A Connection Between Geometric and Gravimetric Geodesy, Some Remarks on the Role of the Gravity Field, in: Baarda Festbundel, vol. 2, 603–621, 1982.Google Scholar
- Rummel, R., O.L. Colombo: Gravity Field Determination from Satellite Gradiometry, bulletin géodésique, 59, 233–246, 1985.Google Scholar
- Rummel, R.: From the Observational Model to Gravity Parameter Estimation, in: proc. Local Gravity Field Approximation, 67–106, Beijing, 1984.Google Scholar
- Selényi, P. (ed.): Roland Eötvös Gesammelte Arbeiten, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1953.Google Scholar
- Spaceborne Gravity Gradiometers, proc. workshop held at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., 1983.Google Scholar
- Spiegel, M.R.: Theoretical Mechanics, Schaum's Outline Series, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
- Theiss, D.S.: Neue Gravitative Effekte rotierender Massen Möglichkeiten für weitere Tests der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Dissertation, Köln, 1984.Google Scholar
- Toperczer, M.: Lehrbuch der allgemeinen Geophysik, Springer, Wien, 1960.Google Scholar
- Tscherning, C.C.: Representation of Covariance Functions Related to the Anomalous Potential of the Earth Using Reproducing Kernels, Internal Report 3, Dan. Geod. Inst., Copenhagen, 1972.Google Scholar
- Tscherning, C.C.: Comparison of the Second-Order Derivatives of the Normal Potential Based on the Representation by a Legendre Series, manuscripta geodaetica, 1, 2, 71–92, 1976.Google Scholar
- Wertz, J.R. (ed.): Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag 1986