Repeated bargaining under uncertainty

  • Harri Ehtamo
  • Jukka Ruusunen
  • Raimo P. Hämäläinen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences book series (LNCIS, volume 119)

Abstract

The Nash bargaining scheme is extended to discrete and continuous time dynamic games. The bargaining takes place under future uncertainty and the contracting takes place at each stage on the basis of the available information. A two-level hierarchical method to handle such problems is presented. At the lower level a weighted sum of the decision makers' objectives is maximized. This corresponds to solving the cooperative problem with a given contract, which is expressed by the weights of the individual objectives. At the top level the contract is determined by solving an algebraic equation such that the rationality axioms of the Nash bargaining scheme are satisfied for the whole time interval of cooperation.

Keywords

Bargaining Solution Bargaining Problem Nash Bargaining Solution Future Uncertainty Admissible Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6. References

  1. Ehtamo, H., J. Ruusunen, V. Kaitala and R. P. Hämäläinen (1986), „Solution for a dynamic bargaining problem with an application to resource management,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 59, to appear.Google Scholar
  2. Ehtamo, H., J. Ruusunen, and R. P. Hämäläinen (1987), „On the computation of the Nash bargaining solution with an energy management example,” in Proc. 26th IEEE CDC, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 263–266.Google Scholar
  3. Ruusunen, J., H. Ehtamo, and R. P. Hämäläinen (1988), „Bargaining with dynamic information,” in Proc. 3rd Bellman Continuum, Springer-Verlag, to appear.Google Scholar
  4. Ehtamo, H., J. Ruusunen, and R. P. Hämäläinen (1989), „A hierarchical approach to bargaining in power pool management,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, to appear.Google Scholar
  5. Roth, A. E. (1979), „Axiomatic Models of Bargaining,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harri Ehtamo
    • 1
  • Jukka Ruusunen
    • 1
  • Raimo P. Hämäläinen
    • 1
  1. 1.EspooFinland

Personalised recommendations