Engaging University Students in Australia

Chapter

Abstract

Applied work in Australia began in 2007, building on 5 years of scholarly research and consultation. This chapter explores how the Australian data collection was seeded and took shape. As with the other chapters, the discussion offers insight into the challenges and work required to build a system-level data collection. The chapter reviews a specific line of conceptual and empirical debate to support the rationales moulding the collection—the need to shift quality assessments beyond student satisfaction to engagement. The final section discusses the various ways that institutions and other stakeholders embraced the data and insights.

Keywords

Student Engagement Australian Student Australian High Education Course Experience Questionnaire High Education Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA). (2009). Australian Universities Quality Agency Audit Manual. Melbourne: AUQA.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  3. Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coates, H. (2011). An overview of psychometric properties of the AUSSE student engagement questionnaire (SEQ). AUSSE Research Briefing 7. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  5. Coates, H., & Ransom, L. (2011). Dropout DNA, and the genetics of effective support. AUSSE Research Briefing 9. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  6. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2011a). Advancing Quality in Higher Education. http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Policy/Pages/AdvancingQuality.aspx. Accessed 19 Dec 2011.
  7. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2011b). Demand Driven Funding for Undergraduate Student Places. http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Resources/Pages/FundingUndergradStudent.aspx. Accessed 3 Jan 2012.
  8. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2011c). Development of performance measurement instruments in higher education: Discussion Paper. Canberra: DEEWR.Google Scholar
  9. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Little, G. (1975). Faces on Campus: A psychosocial study. Parkville: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lomax-Smith, J., Watson, L., & Webster, B. (2011). Higher education base funding review. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  12. Richardson, S. (2011). Uniting teachers and learners: Critical insights into the importance of staff-student interactions in Australian university education. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Council for Educational ResearchMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations