Purposeful Policy and Practice for Equity and Quality – A Finnish Case

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Education Innovation Series book series (EDIN)

Abstract

The chapter describes how equity and quality are closely connected in the Finnish educational system. The Finnish system aims to support learners to become active agents in their daily lives and in society as a whole. Values related to life-long learning are important at all levels of the educational system. In order to connect equity and life-long learning, the educational system needs to be very flexible and learners must be able to continue schooling at any stage of their lives. The article also introduces the major tools for keeping up the quality in the system. The national decision has been to use all evaluation for improvements, not ranking. This enhancement-led principle is connected with local responsibility to design school-based curricula and implementation of the national core curricula. There is no national achievement testing. Local educational providers are responsible for the quality of teaching. The key issue is high quality teachers whose teacher education prepares them to work as reflective professionals. The article also reflects on the major challenges of the Finnish system for the future.

Keywords

Teacher Education Student Teacher Lifelong Learning Basic Education Core Curriculum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aloni, N. (2002). Enhancing humanity: The philosophical foundations of humanistic education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. (2009). Good education: What it is and why we need it. Inaugural lecture at The Stirling Institute of Education, Stirling, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, E. (2008). Preparing ethical professionals as a challenge for teacher education. In K. Tirri (Ed.), Educating moral sensibilities in urban schools (pp. 3–8). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, W., & Hartnett, A. (1996). Education and the struggle for democracy: The politics of educational ideas. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teaching and educational transformation. In M. Fullan, A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 505–522). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Day, C., & Johansson, O. (2008). Leadership with a difference in schools serving disadvantaged communities: Arenas for success. In K. Tirri (Ed.), Educating moral sensibilities in urban schools (pp. 19–34). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Finnish Educational Evaluation Council. (2012). Introduction. Mission. Retrieved from http://www.edev.fi/portal/english5/basis_for_operation
  9. Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council. (2012). Duties. Retrieved from http://www.finheec.fi/index.phtml?l=en&s=28
  10. Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2000). National core curriculum for pre-school education in Finland. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/download/123162_core_curriculum_for_pre_school_education_2000.pdf
  11. Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2004a). National core curriculum for basic education. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/sources_of_information/core_curricula_and_qualification_requirements/basic_education
  12. Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2004b). National core curriculum for upper secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/sources_of_information/core_curricula_and_qualification_requirements/basic_education
  13. Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2012a). Pupil assessment. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/education/basic_education/pupil_assesment
  14. Finnish National Board of Education. (2012b). Basic education. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/education/basic_education
  15. Halinen, I., & Järvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: The case of Finland. Prospects, 38(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (2007). Introduction. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Education as societal contributor (pp. 9–20). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Jyrhämä, R. (2006). The function of practical studies in teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators (pp. 51–70). Turku, Finland: Finnish Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  18. Jyrhämä, R., & Maaranen, R. (2012). Research orientation in teachers’ work. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 97–114). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Kumpulainen, K., & Lankinen, T. (2012). Striving for educational equity and excellence: Evaluation and assessment in Finnish basic education. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 82–96). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Laukkanen, R. (2006). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all. Paper presented at the educational systems and the challenge of improving results conference, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  21. Laukkanen, R. (2008). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all. In N. C. Sognel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 305–324). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Meisalo, V. (2007). Subject teacher education in Finland: A research-based approach – The role of subjects didactics and networking in teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Education as societal contributor (pp. 161–180). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland (MEC). (2007). Opettajankoulutus 2020 [Teacher Education 2020]. Helsinki, Finland: Author.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland (MEC). (2011). Education. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Koulutus/?lang=en
  25. Niemi, H. (2011). Educating student teachers to become high quality professionals – A Finnish case. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(1), 43–66.Google Scholar
  26. Niemi, H. (2012a). The societal factors contributing to education and schooling in Finland. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 82–96). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Niemi, H. (2012b). Teacher education for high quality professionals. An analysis from the Finnish perspective. In O. S. Tan (Ed.), Teacher education frontiers: International perspectives on policy and practice for building new teacher competences (pp. 43–70). Singapore: CENSAGE Learning.Google Scholar
  28. Niemi, H., & Isopahkala-Bouret, U. (2012). Lifelong learning in Finnish society – An analysis of national policy documents. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 5(1), 43–63.Google Scholar
  29. Niemi, H., & Jakku-Sihvonen, R. (2006). Research-based teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators (pp. 31–50). Turku, Finland: Finnish Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  30. Niemi, H., & Lavonen, J. (2012). Evaluation for improvements in Finnish teacher education. In J. Harford, B. Hudson, & H. Niemi (Eds.), Quality assurance and teacher education: International challenges and expectations. Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  31. Nummenmaa, A. R., & Lautamatti. L. (2004). Ohjaajana opinnäytetöiden prosesseissa: Ryhmäohjauksen käytäntöä ja teoriaa [As a supervisor in a thesis processes: Praxis and theory of group guidance]. Tampere, Finland: University Press.Google Scholar
  32. OAJ. (2013). Qualifications (in Finnish Kelpoisuudet). Retrieved from http://www.oaj.fi/portal/page?_pageid=515,452376&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
  33. OECD. (2003). First results from PISA 2003: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/preschoolandschool/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/34002454.pdf
  34. OECD. (2005). Equity in education thematic review: Finland country note. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/document/3/0,2340,en_2649_34531_36296195_1_1_1_1,00.html
  35. OECD. (2006). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/preschoolandschool/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/pisa2006results.htm
  36. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. I). Paris: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reinikainen, P. (2012). Amazing PISA results in Finnish comprehensive schools. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 3–18). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  39. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competences assessed by PISA be considered the fundamental school knowledge 15-years-olds should possess? Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  42. Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Statistics Finland. (2009). Statistics. Education. Retrieved from http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/kou_en.html
  44. Toom, A., & Husu, J. (2012). Finnish teachers as ‘makers of the many’: Balancing between broad pedagogical freedom and responsibility. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 39–54). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Välijärvi, J. (2004). The system and how does it work – Some curricular and pedagogical characteristics of the Finnish comprehensive schools. Educational Journal, 31(2), 2003 & 32(1), 2004, 31–55.Google Scholar
  46. Vitikka, E., Krokfors, L., & Hurmerinta, E. (2012). The Finnish national core curriculum: Structure and development. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 82–96). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Behavioral SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations