Advertisement

Making School Relevant: Adding New Literacies to the Policy Agenda

  • Cheryl McLean
  • Jennifer Rowsell
  • Diane Lapp
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education book series (CSTE, volume 1)

Abstract

Updating online profiles, texting, posting selfies, downloading music, surfing the web, and tweeting while walking along the street or sitting in class are all continual reminders that youth live multimodal lives. Less and less are communication, learning, and comprehension limited to traditional modes of the printed word or text and to more traditional media (although all of these text genres have been multimodal); instead, words are usually nested with visual images/graphics, aural/oral modes, animation, etc. and digital technologies. Indeed, in the popular culture landscape, adults appear to take note of youth’s multimodal literacies and multiple ways of knowing—from video games to websites that purposefully embed three key features of ‘new literacies’ (1) social/interactive (2) multiple modal (e.g. audio, video, print/text), and (3) creative license and expression (e.g. blogs, posts, links, fan fiction/sites). These new skills that transmediated, multimodal texts bring afford young people the opportunity to become active consumers-producers-composers of knowledge and information in a way that can directly and immediately affect and reach others everywhere, everyday.

Keywords

Popular Culture Blended Learning Oral Reading Literacy Practice Digital Literacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Canadian Council on Learning. (2008). Evaluation of the Ontario Ministry of Education’s Student Success/Learning to 18 Strategy: Final report. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/teachers/studentsuccess/CCL_SSE_Report.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2013.
  2. Clark, R., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  3. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2013.
  4. Gainer, J., & Lapp, D. (2010). Literacy remix: Bridging adolescents’ in and out of school literacies. Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  5. Kist, W. (2004). New literacies in action: Teaching and learning in multiple media. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. McLean, C., & Rowsell, J. (2013). (Re)designing literacy teacher education: A call for change. Teaching Education, 24(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment. Garden City: Natural History.Google Scholar
  9. Moll, L. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ontario English Curriculum. (2007). English-Grades 9–10. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  11. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2011). Ontario schools kindergarten-grade 12: Policy and program requirements. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education. (http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/policy/os/ONSchools.pdf).Google Scholar
  12. United States Department of Education. (2013). Elementary and Secondary Education Act. http://www.ed.gov/esea. Accessed 27 July 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Brock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  3. 3.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations