Advertisement

SDG 15 Life on Land

A Review of Sustainable Fashion Design Processes: Upcycling Waste Organic Yarns
  • Claudia AranaEmail author
  • Isabel B. Franco
  • Anuska Joshi
  • Jyoti Sedhai
Chapter
Part of the Science for Sustainable Societies book series (SFSS)

Abstract

The fashion industry has had a significant impact on the environment and overall global sustainability. Evidence shows it is the most polluting industry and the largest consumer of water, accounting for 20% of global water wastage detrimentally affecting both life on land and underwater. As such a few key stakeholders in the fashion industry have begun undertaking key preventative measures. These include but are not limited to the use of organic cotton crops, reduction of water use throughout the production chain, the implementation of a zero-waste patternmaking technique, second-hand shops, recycling of production materials, recycling discarded fishing nets into nylon fibre and increasing the use of biodegradable fibres, crop’s waste fibres, bio-based fibres and bio-textile processes and renewable sources like bamboo and hemp. The review presented in this chapter examines the fashion production cycle, the use of alternative organic materials and recycling processes for the sustainable production of yarns whilst exploring the connections between the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 15 Life on Land and 14 Life below Water.

Keywords

Sustainable fashion Waste Organic yarns SDG 15 Life on Land SDG 14 Life below Water Sustainability 

References

  1. Al-Sabagh AM, Yehia FZ, Eshaq G, Rabie AM, EIMetwally AE (2015) Greener routes for recycling of polyethylene. Egypt J Pet 25(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.00CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choudhury AKR (2017) Sustainable chemical technologies for textile production. In MS (ed) Sustainable fibres and textiles, The Textile Institute Book Series, Pages 267-322Google Scholar
  3. Black S (ed) (2012) The sustainable fashion handbook. London, pp:278–283. isbn: 978-0500290569Google Scholar
  4. Boucher J, Friot D (2017) Primary microplastics in the oceans: a global evaluation of sources. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. 43ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cervellon M, Wernerfelt A (2012) Knowledge sharing among green fashion communities online: lessons for the sustainable supply chain. J Fash Mark Manag 16(2):176–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211222860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark R, Merlin M (2013) Cannabis evolution and ethnobotany. University of California Press. isbn: 978-0-520-27048-0Google Scholar
  7. CRAiLAR (2018) CRAiLAR Fibre Technologies International Inc. Retrieved from https://www.crailar-fti.com/what-is-crailar-fibre-2/
  8. Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch BB, Sinkovics RR, Bohlen GM (2003) Can socio-demographic still play a role in profiling green consumer? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J Bus Res 56: 465–480 (Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DuPont S (2018) DuPont, Sorona®. Retrieved from http://sorona.com/apparel
  10. DyeCoo (2018) DyeCoo. Retrieved from http://www.dyecoo.com/co2-dyeing/
  11. FAO (2009) FAO. Retrieved from FAO Natural Fibres Ancient Fabrics, High-Tech Geotextiles : http://www.naturalfibres2009.org/en/fibres/
  12. FAO, ICAC (2013) World apparel fibre consumption survey. FAO, ICAC. isbn: 9780979390395Google Scholar
  13. FAO, ITPS (n.d.) (2015) Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR)- main report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Intergovernmental Technical Panel of Soils, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  14. Fletcher K (2014) Sustainable fashion and textiles second edition. Routledge. isbn: 978-0415644563Google Scholar
  15. Fraj E, Martinez E (2006) Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behavior: an empirical analysis. J Consum Mark 23(3): 133–144. (Link, Google Scholar, Infotrieve)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gam HJ (2011) Are fashion-conscious consumers more likely to adopt eco-friendly clothing? J Fash Mark Manag 15(2):178–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021111132627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. HKRITA (2018) HKRITA, April 14. Retrieved from HKRITA Garners Admirable Accolades in the International Exhibitions of Inventions of Geneva: http://www.hkrita.com/marketing/PressRelease/20180419_HKRITA_46th_Invention_Award_Press_Brief/Award_projects_eng.pdf
  18. Kant R (2012) Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat Sci:22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kapsali V (2012) Nature as a paradigm for sustainability in the textile and apparel industry. In: Black S (ed) The Sustainable fashion handbook. London, pp 278–283. isbn: 978-0500290569Google Scholar
  20. Karthik R, Rathinamoorthy R (2017) Sustainable synthetic fibre production. In MS (ed) Sustainable fibres and textiles, The Textile Institute Book Series, pp 191–240Google Scholar
  21. Kim H, Damhorst MR (1998) Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Cloth Text Res J 16(3): 126–133 (Crossref, Google Scholar, Infotrieve)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunz G (2005) Merchandising theory, principles, and practice, 2nd edn. Fairchild Publications, New York (Google Scholar)Google Scholar
  23. Lakshmanan S, Raghavendran G (2017) In: SS (ed) Low water-consumption technologies for textile production, The textile institute book series, pp 243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lenzing AG (2018) Retrieved from https://www.lenzing.com/en/sustainability/
  25. Marseglia M (2017) Design process and sustainability. Method and tools. Des J 20:S1725–S1737Google Scholar
  26. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR (2018) Global warming of 1.5 degree celcius: summary for policymakers. IPCCGoogle Scholar
  27. McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things (a Melcher Mediabook). North Point Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Muthu SS, Gardetti MA (2016) Green fashion volume 1. Springer, Singapore. isbn: 978-981-10-0109-3Google Scholar
  29. Napper IE, Thompson RC (2016) Release of synthetic microplastic plastic fibres from domestic washing machines: effects of fabric type and washing conditions. Mar Pollut Bull 112(1–2):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. NatureWorks (2018) NatureWorks. Retrieved from https://www.natureworksllc.com/
  31. Park TY, Lee S (2014) Fibres polymer. 14(311). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-0311-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patagonia (2018) Patagonia. Retrieved from https://www.patagonia.com/materials-tech.html
  33. Peters G, Granberg H, Sweet S (2014) The role of science and technology for sustainable fashion. In: Fletcher K, Tham M (eds) The handbook of sustainable fashion. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Power E (2012) Sustainable developments in knitting. Int J Bus Glob 9(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Radhakrishnan S (2017) In: SS (ed) Sustainable cotton production, The textile institute book series, pp 21–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenbloom S (2010) Fashion tries on zero waste design, August 13. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  37. Roy AK (2017) Sustainable chemical technologies for textile production. In SS (ed) Sustainable fibres and textiles, The Textile Institute Book Series, pp 267–322Google Scholar
  38. Šajn N (2019) Environmental impact of the textile. European Parliamentary Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
  39. Superego (2018) Superego, February. Retrieved from The Dangers of Synthetic Fibers and Fabrics on the Environment: https://superegoworld.com/blogs/the-world/the-dangers-of-synthetic-fibers-and-fabrics-on-the-environment
  40. TEIJIN (2006) TEIJIN CSR Report 2006. Retrieved from https://www.teijin.com/csr/report/pdf/csr_06_en_all.pdf
  41. TENCEL (2018) TENCEL. Retrieved from https://www.tencel.com
  42. TENCEL REFRIBRA (2018) TENCEL. Retrieved from REFRIBRA: https://www.tencel.com/refibra
  43. Tierra (2017) Tierra. Retrieved from Mono-Materials: https://tierra.com/environmental-work-2/mono-materials-recycling/
  44. UN (2019) UN Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from Life on Land: Why does it Matter?: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/15_Why-it-Matters_Goal15__Life-on-Land_3p.pdf
  45. UNECE (2019) Fashion and the SDGs: what role for the UN? https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/RCM_Website/RFSD_2018_Side_event_sustainable_fashion.pdf. Retrieved 9 April 2019
  46. UNFCCC (2018) United Nations Climate Change News, 22 January. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/RCM_Website/RFSD_2018_Side_event_sustainable_fashion.pdf
  47. VICTOR Textiles (2018) VICTOR Textiles. Retrieved from https://www.victortextiles.com/en/at-a-glance/#case-study
  48. Walker A (2017) Patent Application Publication. Worn Again Footwear and Accessories LimitedGoogle Scholar
  49. Worn Again (2018) Worn Again. Retrieved from Technologies http://wornagain.co.uk/
  50. WWF (2019) WWF. Retrieved from Sustainable Agriculture: https://www.worldwildlife.org/industries/cotton
  51. Yulex Corporation (2018) Yulex Corporation Products. Retrieved from http://yulex.com/products/fsc-hevea/
  52. Zimmer MR, Stafford TF, Stafford MR (1994) Green issues: dimensions of environmental concern. J Bus Res 30(1):63–74 (Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar, Infotrieve)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Arana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isabel B. Franco
    • 2
    • 3
  • Anuska Joshi
    • 4
  • Jyoti Sedhai
    • 4
  1. 1.Bunka Gakuen University, Fashion Global ConcentrationShibuyaJapan
  2. 2.Institute for the Advanced Study of SustainabilityUnited Nations University Shibuya-kuTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Australian Institute for Business and EconomicsThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.United Nations University, Institute for the Advanced Study of SustainabilityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations