Advertisement

The Correlation Between Urban Morphology Parameters and Incident Solar Radiation Performance to Enhance Pedestrian Comfort, Case Study Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

  • Badia MasoudEmail author
  • Helena Coch
  • Benoit Beckers
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 163)

Abstract

Many urban studies have evaluated the impact of urban morphology on the microclimate of cities, and it has been shown that the influence is substantial. One of the significant impacts on outdoor thermal comfort in hot climate cities depends on solar radiation. The city of Jeddah is expected to start constructing a subway in 2020 that is likely to drastically change the behaviors of its inhabitants. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between modern and contemporary morphology and the potential of incident solar radiation to enhance pedestrian comfort by avoiding transit under this harsh solar radiation. The authors have evaluated the performance of two urban layouts, with different building densities to investigate the extent to which morphological features of the built environment can affect solar penetration on the streets. Moreover, the study assessed the influence of various built parameters such as street geometry (H/W ratio, streets orientations) and the solar indicator (Sky View Factor). Results show that in the low rise building layouts, the orientation of streets and the H/W ratio are not reliable. Moreover, it is difficult to reduce solar radiation penetration on the streets by modifying the morphology. Therefore, other ways should be tested to shade from solar penetration. Furthermore, the authors have observed that for high rise building layouts, pedestrian comfort could be modified through the adjacent morphology.

Keywords

Urban morphology Incident solar radiation Pedestrian comfort 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Spanish Ministry of Education for supporting this work under project code: BIA2016-77675-R. And special thanks to the Ministry of Education of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for supporting and funding this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Real, L: Density, city, residence. Densification techniques and anti-sprawl strategies. Editor, Gangemi, Roma (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banham, R.: The Architecture of the Well-Tempered Environment, 2nd Ed. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA; The Architectural Press Ltd., London, UK (1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forgaci, C., Van Timmeren, A.: Urban form and fitness: towards a space-morphological approach to general urban. In: Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ewing, R.: Characteristics, causes and effects of sprawl: a literature review. In: Marzluff, J., Shulenberger, E., Endlicher, W., Alberti, M., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., ZumBrunnen, C., Simon, U. (eds.) Urban Ecology An International Perspective on the Interaction Between Humans and Nature, 1st edn. Springer, USA, New York, NY, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banham, R.: The Architecture of Four Ecologies. Allen Lane the Penguin Press, London, UK (1971)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mumford, L.: New York et l’Urbanisme. Editions Seghers, Paris, France (1965)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raydan, D., Steeners, K.: Environmental urban design. In: Santamouris, M. (ed.) Environmental Design of Urban Buildings, an Integrated Approach, pp. 1–35. Routledge. New York, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lima, I.A.: Soleri: Architecture as a Human Ecology (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winter, C.: solar cities. Renew Energy 4(1), 15–28 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johansson, E.: Influence of urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort in a hot, dry climate: a study in Fez Morocco. Build. Environ. 41(10), 1326–1338 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.0222010.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindberg, F., Grimmond, C.: Continuous Sky View Factor maps from high resolution urban digital elevation models. Clim. Res. 42(3), 177–183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rasheed, A., Robinson, D., Narayanan, C., Lakehal, D.: On the effects of complex urban geometries on mesoscale modelling. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Urban Climate, Yokohama, Japan (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curreli, A., Serra-Coch, G., Isalgue, A., Crespo, I., Coch, H.: Solar energy as a form giver for future cities. Energies.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en9070544 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ali-Toudert, F., Mayer, H.: Effects of asymmetry, galleries, overhanging façades and vegetation on thermal comfort in urban street canyons. Sol Energy 81(6) (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bourbia, F., Boucheriba, F.: Impact of street design on urban microclimate for semi arid climate (Constantine). Renew. Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.017344 (2010)
  16. 16.
    Oke, T.R.: Canyon geometry and the nocturnal urban heat island: comparison of scale model and field observations. Int. J. Climatol, 237–254 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Middel, A., Lukasczyk, J., Maciejewski, R., Demuzere, M, Roth M.: Sky View Factor footprints for urban climate modeling. Urban Clim. 120–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim (2018)
  18. 18.
    Masoud, B., Coch, H., Crespo, I., Beckers, B.: Effects of urban morphology on shading for pedestrians Sky View Factor (SVF) as an indicator of solar access. In: Passive and low energy architecture conference, Hong Kong (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beckers, B., Masset, L.: Heliodon2 software and user’s guide. http://www.heliodon.net (2009)
  20. 20.
    Masoud, B., Coch, H., Beckers, B.: Sky access versus shading for pedestrian comfort in the hot tropical climate of Jeddah. In: First International Conference on Urban Physics, Quito-Galapagos (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pont, MB., Haupt, P.: Spacematrix, Space, Density and Urban Form. NAi Uitgevers ISBN 10:9056627422 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Compagnon, R.: Solar and daylight availability in the urban fabric. Energy Build. 36, 321–328 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Middel, A., Häb, K., Brazel, A.J., Martin, C., Guhathakurta, S.: Impact of urban form and design on microclimate in Phoenix Urban Plan. 122, 16–28 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shishegar, N.: Street design and urban microclimate: analyzing the effects of street geometry and orientation on airflow and solar access in urban canyons. J. Clean Energy Technol.  https://doi.org/10.7763/jocet.2013.v1.13 (2013)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Architecture and Energy Research Group-School of Architecture, Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Building and Public Works (ISABTP)Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, Allée du Parc MontauryAngletFrance

Personalised recommendations