Advertisement

How the Position of a Root-Top One-Sided Wind Tower Affects Its Cross-Ventilation Effectiveness

  • Mehrnoosh AhmadiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 163)

Abstract

Despite their antiquity, wind towers have only recently gained popularity among the researchers and architects practicing natural ventilation, especially since their performance relies both on wind and stack effect. In studying natural ventilation using wind towers, different environmental parameters and their various geometrical elements have been taken into consideration previously, but the position of the wind tower with respect to the lower building has never been assessed. Therefore, this study employs CFD to understand how at various wind incident angles, three different positions of a one-sided wind tower with respect to the lower room’s window can provide different cross-ventilation efficiencies in terms of mass flow rate, velocity magnitude, and mean age of air inside the room. Furthermore, this study shows how a case with a better airflow rate might not necessarily have the freshest air at the same time. Therefore, for a natural ventilation study to be reliable, it is necessary to evaluate several parameters simultaneously.

Keywords

Wind towers Cross ventilation CFD 

References

  1. 1.
    Heiselberg, P.: Natural ventilation design. Int. J. Vent. 2(4), 295–312 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiesa, G., Grosso, M.: Breakthrough of natural and hybrid ventilative cooling technologies: models and simulations. Int. J. Vent. 15(3–4), 183–185 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaziri, A.A.K., Bastani Parizi, M.E. (eds.): History of Kerman. Elm, Tehran (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Battle McCarthy Consulting Engineers: Wind Towers, Detail in Building. Academy Press, West Sussex (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hughes, B.R., Cheuk-Ming, M.: A study of wind and buoyancy driven flows through commercial wind towers. Energy Build. 43, 1784–1791 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Montazeri, H.: Experimental and numerical study on natural ventilation performance of various multi-opening wind catchers. Build. Environ. 46(2), 370–378 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kazemi, M.E., Dehghan, A.A., Dehghan, M.M., Mohagheghian, S.: Visualized flow structure around and inside of one-sided wind-catchers. Energy Build. 55, 545–552 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghadiri, M.H., Ibrahim, N.L.N., Mohamed, M.F.: Performance evaluation of four-sided square wind catchers with different geometries by numerical method. Engineering Journal 17(4), 9–17 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghadiri, M.H., Lukman, N., Ibrahim, N., Mohamed, M.F.: Applying computational fluid dynamic to evaluate the performance of four-sided rectangular wind catcher with different height. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 7, 502–509 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Montazeri, H., Montazeri, F.: CFD simulation of cross-ventilation in buildings using rooftop windcatchers: Impact of outlet openings. Renew. Energy 118, 502–520 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montazeri, H., Azizian, R.: Experimental study on natural ventilation performance of one-sided wind catcher. Build. Environ. 43(12), 234–244 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shih, T.H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., Zhu, J.: A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput. Fluids 24, 227–238 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., Carmeliet, J.: CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos. Environ. 41, 238–252 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polytechnic University of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations