Low-Pass Selective Filters with Increased Selectivity

  • Vančo LitovskiEmail author
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 596)


The characteristic function of the polynomial (CMAC and C) filters available, when requirements for increased selectivity is to be satisfied, a question arises as to what is better from the circuit complexity point of view: to increase the order of the filter (the order of the polynomial) or to introduce transmission zeros on the ω-axis so making the transfer function rational. This dilemma is regularly avoided in the literature and no solutions are offered which would help the designer to come to “the cheapest” physical system. Here we propose an algorithm for introduction of arbitrary (up to the maximum possible) number of transmission zeros located on the ω-axis based on the minimum stopband attenuation. It is shown by examples that by introduction of transmission zeros benefits are collected in both the passband and the stopband compared to polynomial solutions extended to the same circuit complexity. In the stopband the selectivity is raised while in the passband the reflected power is decreased (the attenuation in all but the upper end of the passband is reduced). Special extension of this chapter is related to the transfer functions with multiple transmission zeros including the ones exhibiting maximally flat attenuation in the origin.


  1. 1.
    Temes G, Gyi M (1967) Design of filters with arbitrary pass-band and Chebyshev stopband attenuation. IEEE Int Conv. Rec. Pt 5:2–12Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rakovic B (1974) Designing monotonic low-pass filters - comparison of some methods and criteria. Int J Circuit Theory Appl 2(3):215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang C (1968) Maximally flat amplitude low-pass filters with an arbitrary number of pairs of real frequency transmission zeros. IEEE Trans Circuit Theory CT 15(4):465–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Budak A, Aronhime P (1970) Maximally flat low-pass filters with steeper slopes at cutoff. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust AU 18(1):63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dutta-Roy S (1971) On maximally flat sharp cutoff low-pass filters. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust AU 19(1):58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harris F (1972) On maximally flat low-pass filters with ripple in the stopband. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust AU 18(5):345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rakovich BD, Litovski VB (1974) Monotonic passband low-pass filters with Chebyshev stopband attenuation. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process ASSP 22(1):39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Litovski VB, Raković BD (1974) Attenuation characteristics and element values of least-squares monotonic passband filters with an arbitrary number of transmission zeros. Publications of Electrical Engineering Faculty, University of Belgrade, Series ETA 97–101:67–101Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dutta-Roy SC (1971) On maximally flat sharp cutoff low-pass filters. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust 19(1):58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wei CH (1968) An alternative approach for designing maximally flat low-pass filters with multiple order imaginary-axis zeros. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 33(6):642–644; and Wei CH (1987) Correction to an alternative approach for designing maximally flat low-pass filters with multiple order imaginary-axis zeros. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 34(1):109–109Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andrejević Stošović MV, Živanić JM, Litovski VB (2014) Maximally flat filter functions with maximum number of transmission zeros having maximal multiplicity. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II: Express Briefs 61(10):778–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Elektronski FakultetNišSerbia

Personalised recommendations