Advertisement

Exploring the Phytoremediation Potential of Calotropis gigantea L. Using a Combined FTIR and Principal Component Analysis

  • P. Sangeetha
  • Perumal Venkatachalam
  • Natesan Geetha
Chapter

Abstract

Chromium (Cr) is a main concern pollutant and has been recognized to be harmful to fauna, flora, and human beings. The intent of the present study was to investigate the phytoremediation potential of Calotropis gigantea L. plant using a combined FTIR and principal component analysis (PCA) for effective Cr removal. Plant leaves were collected from unpolluted and polluted areas (near tanneries). After authentication, the composite leaf sample of each site was thoroughly washed and allowed to dry. The dried samples were finely powdered and used for FTIR analysis. The FTIR spectra of both the samples showed totally 8 peak values and corresponding 12 functional groups such as alcohols, phenols, alkanes, carboxylic acids, alkynes, alkenes, aromatics, amines, esters, ethers, aliphatic amines, and alkyl chlorides. The peak value’s difference was found to be very low between samples. To confirm this, peak values were subjected to PCA which revealed that no functional groups of both the samples contributing variation were identified. This observation suggests that this plant has a protective mechanism to detoxify heavy metal Cr and could be used for phytoremediation purpose in the future.

Keywords

Calotropis gigantea Phytoremediation Chromium FTIR PCA 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author thank DST-CURIE funding agency for providing infrastructure facilities to carry out this experimental work at Mother Teresa Women’s University, Kodaikanal, Tamil Nadu, India.

References

  1. Barud H, Júnior A, Saska S, Mestieri L et al (2013) Antimicrobial Brazilian propolis (EPPAF) containing biocellulose membranes as promising biomaterial for skin wound healing. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013:1–10. Article ID 703024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks RR (1972) Geobotany and geochemistry in mineral exploration. Harper and Row, New York, p 292Google Scholar
  3. Chen L, Carpita NC, Reiter WD, Wilson RH, Jeffries C, McCann MC (1998) A rapid method to screen for cell-wall mutants using discriminant analysis of Fourier transform infrared spectra. Plant J 16:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dokken KM, Davis LC (2007) Infrared imaging of sunflower and maize root anatomy. J Agric Food Chem 55:10517–10530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dönmez G, Aksu Z (2001) Bioaccumulation of copper (II) and nickel (II) by the non-adapted and adapted growing Candida sp. Water Res 35:1425–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eapen S, Shraddha S, Throat V, Kaushik CP, Raj K, D’Souza SF (2006) Phytoremediation of radiostrontium (90Sr) and radiocesium (137Cs) using giant milky weed (Calotropis gigantea R.Br.) plants. Chemosphere 65:2071–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Nady FE, Atta MM (1996) Toxicity and bioaccumulation of heavy metals to some marine biota from the Egyptian coastal waters. J Environ Sci Health Part A 31:1529–1545Google Scholar
  8. Gong Y, Liu X, Huang L, Chen W (2010) Stabilization of chromium: an alternative to make safe leathers. J Hazard Mater 179:540–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9Google Scholar
  10. Hashem AR, Al-Farraj MM (1995) Mineral analysis of soil, Euphorbia hirta L. and mycoflora from the industrial Yanbu city, Saudi Arabia. Qatar Univ Sci J 15:83–89Google Scholar
  11. Hemalatha M, Arirudran B, Thenmozhi A, Rao USM (2011) Antimicrobial effect of separate extract of acetone, ethyl acetate, methanol and aqueous from leaf of Milkweed (Calotropis gigantea L.). Asian J Pharm 1:102–107Google Scholar
  12. Manrique GD, Lajolo FM (2004) Cell wall polysaccharide modifications during post harvest ripening of papaya fruit (Carica papaya). Postharvest Biol Technol 33:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martini D, Taddei F, Ciccoritti R, Pasquini M, Nicoletti I, Corradini D, D’Egidio MG (2015) Variation of total antioxidant activity and of phenolic acid, total phenolics and yellow coloured pigments in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) as a function of genotype, crop year and growing area. J Cereal Sci 65:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCann MC, Hammouri MK, Wilson RH, Belton PS, Roberts K (1992) Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy is a new way to look at plant cell walls. Plant Physiol 100:1940–1947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr (2006) Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water. J Hazard Mater 137:762–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mondal NC, Singh VP (2010) Need of groundwater management in tannery belt: a scenario about Dindigul town, Tamil Nadu. J Geol Soc India 76:303–309Google Scholar
  17. Nasr MM, Gondal MA, Seddigi ZS (2011) Detection of hazardous pollutants in chrome tanned leather using locally developed laser-induced breakdown spectrometer. Environ Monit Assess 175:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paul Basker J (2000) Tanneries in Dindigul district. Dossier on Tannery pollution in Tamil nadu. Peace Trust, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India 208–210 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramamurthy N, Kannan S (2007) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of a plant (Calotropis gigantea Linn) from an industrial village, Cuddalore dt, Tamilnadu, India. Romanian J Biophys 17:269–276Google Scholar
  20. Saha R, Nandi R, Saha B (2011) Sources and toxicity of hexavalent chromium. J Coord Chem 64:1782–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharma AP, Tripathi BD (2009) Assessment of atmospheric PAHs profile through Calotropis gigantea R.Br. leaves in the vicinity of an Indian coal-fired power plant. Environ Monit Assess 149:477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siva GV, Vidhya U (2015) Phytoremediation of heavy metal chromium using Allium cepa L. as model system. Int J Curr Biotechnol 3:1–5Google Scholar
  23. Vankar PS, Dwivedi AK (2009) Sulphates for skin preservation—a novel approach to reduce tannery effluent salinity hazards. J Hazard Mater 163:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Volesky B (1994) Advances in biosorption of metals: selection of biomass types. FEMS Microbiol Rev 14:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Volesky B, Holan ZR (1995) Biosorption of heavy metals. Biotechnol Prog 11:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. WHO G (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Org 216:303–304Google Scholar
  27. Yoganarasimhan SN (2011) Medicinal plants of India. Regional Research Institute (Ay.) Bangalore, Tamil Nadu Ayurvedic uses and pharmacological activities of Calotropis procera Linn. Asian J Tradit Med 6:97Google Scholar
  28. Yu P (2004) Application of advanced synchrotron radiation-based fourier transform infrared (SR-FTIR) microspectroscopy to animal nutrition and feed science; a novel approach. Br J Nutr 92:869–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yu P (2005) Molecular chemistry imaging to reveal structural features of various plant feed tissues. J Struct Biol 150:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Sangeetha
    • 1
    • 2
  • Perumal Venkatachalam
    • 3
  • Natesan Geetha
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Mother Teresa Women’s UniversityKodaikanalIndia
  2. 2.Periyar UniversitySalemIndia
  3. 3.Department of Biotechnology, School of BiosciencesPeriyar UniversitySalemIndia
  4. 4.Department of BotanyBharathiar UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations