Advertisement

Sustainable Polymer-Based Microfluidic Fuel Cells for Low-Power Applications

  • Moumita Sardar
  • Ravi Kumar ArunEmail author
  • Ebenezer Olubunmi Ige
  • Preeti Singh
  • Gagan Kumar
  • Nripen Chanda
  • Gautam Biswas
Chapter
Part of the Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials book series (MHFNN)

Abstract

The growing demands of energy have generated interest in the development of miniaturized power sources. In this context, the potential of microfluidics for energy generation is immense. Microfluidic devices are very useful for manipulation and control of fluid flow at low Reynolds number which has immense application in industrial and biomedical domains. During laminar flow, mixing by turbulence is minimized and the only remaining mechanism for mixing is diffusion. Fuel cells which convert the chemical energy of a fuel into electric power have emerged as an alternative means of energy production. Miniaturized fuel cells offer several benefits over conventional methods such as portability and faster mass transfer. Hence, microfluidic fuel cell offers the possibilities of a fast start-up device for rapid energy generation with high power density, low cost, and disposability with minimum environmental impact. However, the use of appropriate fabrication method and suitable material in the development and successful implementation of microfluidic fuel cells is highly crucial. The material should be readily available, inexpensive, and adaptable for the fabrication process. In this chapter, we discuss polymer materials for microfluidic fuel cell design. The polymers are used as a material to design the fuel cell and as a proton exchange membrane along with assisting in oxygen transport as air-breathing layers. We will describe the above aspects in detail to look at the current challenges in microfluidic fuel cells and arrive at a solution which is simple and innovative for the low-power applications. Our aim is to emphasize sustainable polymers at low cost to realize the potential of microfluidic fuel cell devices.

Keywords

Microfluidics Fuel cells Sustainable polymer Low-power application 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Harish Hirani, Director, and Dr. Nilrudra Mandal, Head, Material Processing and Microsystems Laboratory, CSIR-CMERI, Durgapur, for their encouragements. Support from DST-SERB grant under project no. GAP-221112 is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Moore S, Sinton D, Erickson D (2011) A plate-frame flow-through microfluidic fuel cell stack. J Power Sources.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zou H, Chen J, Fang Y, Ding J, Peng W, Liu R (2016) A dual-electrolyte based air-breathing regenerative microfluidic fuel cell with 1.76 V open-circuit-voltage and 0.74 V water-splitting voltage. Nano Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.07.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shah K, Shin WC, Besser RS (2004) A PDMS micro proton exchange membrane fuel cell by conventional and non-conventional microfabrication techniques. SensS Actuators B Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2003.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brushett FR, Zhou W-P, Jayashree RS, Kenis PJA (2009) Alkaline microfluidic hydrogen–oxygen fuel cell as a cathode characterization platform. J Electrochem Soc 156:B565–B571.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3083226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho B, Kjeang E (2011) Cent Eur J Eng 1:123.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s13531-011-0012-y
  6. 6.
    Yan X, Xu A, Zeng L, Gao P, Zhao T (2018) A paper-based microfluidic fuel cell with hydrogen peroxide as fuel and oxidant. Energy Technol 6:140–143.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201700470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen JL, Westly DA, Pechenik A, Abruña HD (2005) Fabrication and preliminary testing of a planar membraneless microchannel fuel cell. J Power Sources.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.06.072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan SH, Nguyen NT, Xia Z, Wu Z (2005) Development of a polymeric micro fuel cell containing laser-micromachined flow channels. J Micromechanics Microengineering.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/15/1/032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rathoure AK, Pramanik H (2016) Electrooxidation study of methanol using H2O2and air as mixed oxidant at cathode in air breathing microfluidic fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yan X, Xu A, Zeng L, Gao P, Zhao T (2018) A paper-based microfluidic fuel cell with hydrogen peroxide as fuel and oxidant. Energy Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201700470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shyu JC, Huang CL, Sheu TS, Ay H, Huang JW (2012) A study of hydrogen peroxide microfluidic fuel cells. In: 2012 7th IEEE international conference on nano/micro engineered and molecular systems, NEMS 2012Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zebda A, Renaud L, Cretin M, Pichot F, Innocent C, Ferrigno R, Tingry S (2009) A microfluidic glucose biofuel cell to generate micropower from enzymes at ambient temperature. Electrochem Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2008.12.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galvan V, Domalaon K, Tang C, Sotez S, Mendez A, Jalali-Heravi M, Purohit K, Pham L, Haan J, Gomez FA (2016) An improved alkaline direct formate paper microfluidic fuel cell. Electrophoresis.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201500360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hashemi H, Mohammad S, Demetri P (2017) Microfluidic energy conversion devices. Publisher: EPFL.LausanneGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kjeang E, Djilali N, Sinton D (2009) Microfluidic fuel cells: a review. J Power Sources 186:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tarn MD, Pamme N (2014) Microfluidics. Ref Modul Chem Mol Sci Chem Eng, pp 3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409547-2.05351-8Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Swaay D, Mächler JP, Stanley C, Demello A (2014) A chip-to-world connector with a built-in reservoir for simple small-volume sample injection. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc51065dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haeberle S, Mark D, Von Stetten F, Zengerle R (2012) Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. In: Microsystems and nanotechnology pp 853–895.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18293-8_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salloum KS, Posner JD (2011) A membraneless microfluidic fuel cell stack. J Power Sources.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phirani J, Basu S (2008) Analyses of fuel utilization in microfluidic fuel cell. J Power Sources 175:261–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Choban ER, Markoski LJ, Wieckowski A, Kenis PJA (2004) Microfluidic fuel cell based on laminar flow. J Power Sources 128:54–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.11.052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shaegh SAM, Nguyen NT, Chan SH (2011) A review on membraneless laminar flow-based fuel cells. Inter J Hydrogen Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choban ER, Waszczuk P, Kenis PJA (2005) Characterization of limiting factors in laminar flow-based membraneless microfuel cells. Electrochem Solid State Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1921131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gao MF, Zuo YX, Yu Y, Zuo CC (2013) Numerical study the performance of microfluidic fuel cell with porous electrodes. Appl Mech Mater 291:585–588.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.291-294.585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li A, Chan SH, Nguyen NT (2007) A laser-micromachined polymeric membraneless fuel cell. J Micromechanics Microengineering.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/17/6/002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krishnamurthy D, Johansson EO, Lee JW, Kjeang E (2011) Computational modeling of microfluidic fuel cells with flow-through porous electrodes. J Power Sources.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ebrahimi Khabbazi A, Richards AJ, Hoorfar M (2010) Numerical study of the effect of the channel and electrode geometry on the performance of microfluidic fuel cells. J Power Sources.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Armenta-González AJ, Carrera-Cerritos R, Moreno-Zuria A, Álvarez-Contreras L, Ledesma-García J, Cuevas-Muñiz FM, Arriaga LG (2016) An improved ethanol microfluidic fuel cell based on a PdAg/MWCNT catalyst synthesized by the reverse micelles method. Fuel 167:240–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nguyen NT, Chan SH (2006) Micromachined polymer electrolyte membrane and direct methanol fuel cells—a review. J Micromechanics Microengineering.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/16/4/R01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huo W, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Zou Z, Yang H (2013) Microfluidic direct methanol fuel cell with ladder-shaped microchannel for decreased methanol crossover. Int J Electrochem Sci 8:4827–4838Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fiorini GS, Chiu DT (2005) Disposable microfluidic devices: fabrication, function, and application. Biotechniques 38(3):429–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bhardwaj R, Lightson N, Ukita Y, Takamura Y (2014) Development of oligopeptide-based novel biosensor by solid-phase peptide synthesis on microchip. Sens Actuators B Chem 192:818–825.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.10.086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baharudin L (2008) Microfluidics: fabrications and applications. Instrum Sci Technol 36:222–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10739140701850993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kenis PJA, Stroock AD (2006) Materials for micro- and nanofluidics. MRS Bull.  https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2006.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sandeep A, Saleem K, Akhil V, Harneet K, Parveen L (2014) Microfluidic mechanics and applications: a review. J Nano-Electron Phys 5:1–12Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Deabate S, Fatnassi R, Sistat P, Huguet P (2008) In situ confocal-Raman measurement of water and methanol concentration profiles in Nafion®membrane under cross-transport conditions. J Power Sources.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Majedi FS, Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, Emami SH, Taghipoor M, Dashtimoghadam E, Bertsch A, Moaddel H, Renaud P (2012) Microfluidic synthesis of chitosan-based nanoparticles for fuel cell applications. Chem Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc33253aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ige EO, Raj MK, Dare AA, Chakraborty S (2018) Micromechanical properties of biomedical hydrogel for application as microchannel elastomer. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mitrovski SM, Elliott LCC, Nuzzo RG (2004) Microfluidic devices for energy conversion: planar integration and performance of a passive, fully immersed H2-O2 fuel cell. Langmuir 20:6974–6976.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la048417wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sun L, Crooks RM (2000) Single carbon nanotube membranes: a well-defined model for studying mass transport through nanoporous materials. J Am Chem Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja002429wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rashed MK, Mohd Salleh MA, Abdulbari HA, Shah Ismail MH, Izhar S (2015) The effects of electrode and catalyst selection on microfluidic fuel cell performance. ChemBioEng Rev 2:356–372.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201500007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang C-T, Huang R-Y, Lee Y-C, Zhang C-D (2013) Electrode material of carbon nanotube/polyaniline carbon paper applied in microbial fuel cells. J Clean Energy Technol 1:206–210.  https://doi.org/10.7763/JOCET.2013.V1.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fuerth D, Bazylak A (2013) Up-scaled microfluidic fuel cells with porous flow-through electrodes. J Fluids Eng 135:21102.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wagner LT, Yang J, Ghobadian S, Montazami R, Hashemi N (2012) A Microfluidic reactor for energy applications. Open J Appl Biosens 1:21–25.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojab.2012.13003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arjona N, Goulet M (2015) Direct formic acid microfluidic fuel cell with Pd nanocubes supported on flow-through microporous electrodes 4: 24–28.  https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0031504eelCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Morales-Acosta D, Morales-Acosta MD, Godinez LA, Álvarez-Contreras L, Duron-Torres SM, Ledesma-García J, Arriaga LG (2011) PdCo supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes as an anode catalyst in a microfluidic formic acid fuel cell. J Power Sources.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Li L, Zheng K, Ni M, Leung MKH, Xuan J (2015) Partial modification of flow-through porous electrodes in microfluidic fuel cell. Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gray BL (2014) A review of magnetic composite polymers applied to microfluidic devices. J Electrochem Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1149/2.023402jesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Claudia Arganini AS, Raffaella Comitato FV and AT (2014) We are IntechOpen, the worlds leading publisher of open access books built by scientists, for scientists top 1% control of a proportional hydraulic system. Intech Open. 2: 64.  https://doi.org/10.5772/32009Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Moreno-Zuria A, Dector A, Arjona N, Guerra-Balcázar M, Ledesma-García J, Esquivel JP, Sabaté N, Arrriaga LG, Chávez-Ramírez AU (2013) Formic acid microfluidic fuel cell based on well-defined Pd nanocubes. J Phys Conf SerGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Déctor A, Esquivel JP, González MJ, Guerra-Balcázar M, Ledesma-García J, Sabaté N, Arriaga LG (2013) Formic acid microfluidic fuel cell evaluation in different oxidant conditions. Electrochim Acta 92:31–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shen M, Walter S, Gijs MAM (2009) Monolithic micro-direct methanol fuel cell in polydimethylsiloxane with microfluidic channel-integrated nafion strip. J Power Sources.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Choi J, Roychowdhury A, Kim N, Nikitopoulos DE, Lee W, Han H, Park S (2010) A microfluidic platform with a free-standing perforated polymer membrane. J Micromechanics Microengineering.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/8/085011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kjeang E, Michel R, Harrington DA, Djilali N, Sinton D (2008) A microfluidic fuel cell with flow-through porous electrodes. J Am Chem Soc 130:4000–4006.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja078248cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jayashree RS, Mitchell M, Natarajan D, Markoski LJ, Kenis PJA (2007) Microfluidic hydrogen fuel cell with a liquid electrolyte. Langmuir.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la063673pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Heckele M, Schomburg WK (2004) Review on micro molding of thermoplastic polymers. J Micromech Microeng 14(3).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/14/3/R01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Engel J, Chen J, Chen N, Pandya S, Liu C (2006) We report a detailed study investigating the use of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWNT) filled elastomers to enable sensitive and yet robust MEMS devices. This work is contrasted with previous work using carbon black filling, showing an 8-fold improve. Design, pp 246–249Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mandal S, Pal A, Arun RK, Chanda N (2015) Gold nanoparticle embedded paper with mechanically exfoliated graphite as flexible supercapacitor electrodes. J Electroanal Chem 755:22–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.07.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Varcoe JR, Slade RCT (2006) An electron-beam-grafted ETFE alkaline anion-exchange membrane in metal-cation-free solid-state alkaline fuel cells. Electrochem Commun 16:459–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Butte MJ, Whitesides GM (2007) Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays. Angew Chem Int Ed.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200603817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yu L, Shi ZZ (2015) Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices fabricated by low-cost photolithography and embossing of Parafilm®. Lab Chip 15:1642–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc00044kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Osborn JL, Lutz B, Fu E, Kauffman P, Stevens DY, Yager P (2010) Microfluidics without pumps: Reinventing the T-sensor and H-filter in paper networks. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c004821fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fu E, Ramsey SA, Kauffman P, Lutz B, Yager P (2011) Transport in two-dimensional paper networks. Microfluid Nanofluidics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-010-0643-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Washburn EW (1921) Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. Proc Natl Acad Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.7.4.115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ponomarenko A, Quéré D, Clanet C (2011) A universal law for capillary rise in corners. J Fluid Mech.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112010005276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chakraborty D, Prakash JR, Friend J, Yeo L (2012) Fluid-structure interaction in deformable microchannels. Phys Fluids.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4759493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Fisher LR, Lark PD (1979) An experimental study of the washburn equation for liquid flow in very fine capillaries. J Colloid Interface Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Elizalde E, Urteaga R, Berli CLA (2015) Rational design of capillary-driven flows for paper-based microfluidics. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc01487aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Walji N, MacDonald BD (2016) Influence of geometry and surrounding conditions on fluid flow in paper-based devices. Micromachines.  https://doi.org/10.3390/mi7050073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Park J, Shin JH, Park JK (2016) Experimental analysis of porosity and permeability in pressed paper. Micromachines 7:48.  https://doi.org/10.3390/mi7030048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Shin JH, Park J, Kim SH, Park JK (2014) Programmed sample delivery on a pressurized paper. Biomicrofluidics.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4899773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kim SJ, Paczesny S, Takayama S, Kurabayashi K (2013) Preprogrammed capillarity to passively control system-level sequential and parallel microfluidic flows. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc50187fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Böhm A, Carstens F, Trieb C, Schabel S, Biesalski M (2014) Engineering microfluidic papers: effect of fiber source and paper sheet properties on capillary-driven fluid flow. Microfluid Nanofluidics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1324-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lutz B, Liang T, Fu E, Ramachandran S, Kauffman P, Yager P (2013) Dissolvable fluidic time delays for programming multi-step assays in instrument-free paper diagnostics. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc50178gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Songok J, Tuominen M, Teisala H, Haapanen J, Mäkelä J, Kuusipalo J, Toivakka M (2014) Paper-based micro fluidics: fabrication technique and dynamics of capillary-driven surface flow. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am5055806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cheng CM, Martinez AW, Gong J, Mace CR, Phillips ST, Carrilho E, Mirka KA, Whitesides GM (2010) Paper-based elisa. Angew Chem Int Ed.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ballerini DR, Li X, Shen W (2012) Microfluid Nanofluid 13:769.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-012-0999-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Songjaroen T, Dungchai W, Chailapakul O, Henry CS, Laiwattanapaisal W (2012) Blood separation on microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc21299dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Thuo MM, Martinez RV, Lan WJ, Liu X, Barber J, Atkinson MBJ, Bandarage D, Bloch JF, Whitesides GM (2014) Fabrication of low-cost paper-based microfluidic devices by embossing or cut-and-stack methods. Chem Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm501596sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Li X, Tian J, Nguyen T, Shen W (2008) Paper-based microfluidic devices by plasma treatment. Anal Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801729tCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Fu E, Kauffman P, Lutz B, Yager P (2010) Chemical signal amplification in two-dimensional paper networks. Sens Actuators B Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.06.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Jahanshahi-Anbuhi S, Henry A, Leung V, Sicard C, Pennings K, Pelton R, Brennan JD, Filipe CDM (2014) Paper-based microfluidics with an erodible polymeric bridge giving controlled release and timed flow shutoff. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc50762aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cunningham JC, DeGregory PR, Crooks RM (2016) New functionalities for paper-based sensors lead to simplified user operation, lower limits of detection, and new applications. Annu Rev Anal Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Noh H, Phillips ST (2010) Metering the capillary-driven flow of fluids in paper-based microfluidic devices. Anal Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100431yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Hwang H, Kim SH, Kim TH, Park JK, Cho YK (2011) Paper on a disc: Balancing the capillary-driven flow with a centrifugal force. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1lc20445aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mandal P, Dey R, Chakraborty S (2012) Electrokinetics with “paper-and-pencil” devices. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc40681kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jang I, Song S (2015) Facile and precise flow control for a paper-based microfluidic device through varying paper permeability. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc00465aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Jafry AT, Lim H, Kang SI, Suk JW, Lee J (2016) A comparative study of paper-based microfluidic devices with respect to channel geometry. Colloids Surf A PhysChemical Eng Asp.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.12.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Chang HK, Choi E, Park J (2016) Paper-based energy harvesting from salinity gradients. Lab Chip.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc01232eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Arun RK, Halder S, Chanda N, Chakraborty S (2014) A paper based self-pumping and self-breathing fuel cell using pencil stroked graphite electrodes. Lab Chip 14:1661–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00029cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Arun RK, Singh P, Biswas G, Chanda N, Chakraborty S (2016) Energy generation from water flow over a reduced graphene oxide surface in a paper-pencil device. Lab Chip 16:3589–3596.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc00820hCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moumita Sardar
    • 1
  • Ravi Kumar Arun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ebenezer Olubunmi Ige
    • 1
    • 3
  • Preeti Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gagan Kumar
    • 1
  • Nripen Chanda
    • 1
  • Gautam Biswas
    • 4
  1. 1.Materials Processing and Microsystems LaboratoryCSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research InstituteDurgapurIndia
  2. 2.Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)GhaziabadIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic EngineeringAfe Babalola UniversityAdo-EkitiNigeria
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations