Advertisement

Interaction of Electromagnetic Fields (100 KHz–300 GHz) Exposure with Respect to Human Body Model and Methods for SAR Measurement

  • Rashid Jamal
  • Rajiv Kumar SinghEmail author
  • Ekta Singh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 587)

Abstract

In the present paper, near- and far-field interaction mechanism of EM field and measurement of SAR over human body model for both near- and far-field from the electromagnetic source are described. For the modeling of equivalent human body part phantom model using Maxwell equations, parameters, like complex permittivity, polarization, internal dose, skin effect, etc., are considered. These parameters make SAR measurement easier. Further, the techniques and instruments that are used to measure the SAR for both far-field and near-field region are described. Thermal and electric probes used to measure the SAR have their remarkable boundaries while dealing with the measurement of low and high power levels. It has been identified that electric probes are used for both low- and high-power transceiver, whereas thermal probe is restricted only to high-power transceiver. Further, idea about the analysis of electromagnetic fields induced in biological tissues by thermographic camera is included.

Keywords

Specific absorption rate RF transparent temperature sensor Electric field probe Thermographic camera 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Council of Science and Technology U.P. for providing support under R&D grant scheme.

References

  1. 1.
    IEEE International Committee.: Practice for Measurements and Computations of Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields With Respect to Human Exposure to Such Fields, 100 kHz–300 GHz, IEEE Std. C95.3™-2002 (R2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chou, C.Kc, Bassen, H., Osepchuk, J., Balzano, Q., Petersen, R., Meltz, M., Cleveland, R., Lin, J.C., Heynick, L.: Radio frequency electromagnetic exposure: Tutorial review on experimental dosimetry. Bioelectromagnetics 17(3), 195–208 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NCRP.: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields—Properties, Quantities and Units, Biophysical Interaction, and Measurements NCRP Report 67, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Washington, DC (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayt Jr, W.H., Buck Title, J.A.: Engineering Electromagnetism, 6th edn., McGraw-Hill (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sadiku, M.N.O.: Principle of Electromagnetism, 4th edn. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    WHO.: Environmental Health Criteria 137 Electromagnetic Field (300 Hz to 300 GHz) EHC 137 (2009) (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    TEC India.: Measurement of Electromagnetic Fields from Base Station Antenna, TEC/TP/EMF/001/02 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ICNIRP.: For limiting exposure to time varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (UP TO 300 GHZ), Health Phys. 74(4):494–522 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmad, S.N.: Physics and Engineering of Radiation Detection, 1st edn. Elsevier, Netherland (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guy, A.W., Lin J.C.: Quantities, Units, and Measurement Techniques for RF and Microwave Fields in Biological Tissues, URSI Fall Meeting, Williamsburg, VA (1972)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, C.C., Guy, A.W.: Nonionizing electromagnetic wave effects in biological materials and systems. Proc. IEEE 60(6), 692–718 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durney, C.H., Massoudi, H.: Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook, 4th edn. (Report TR-85-73). Brooks Air Force Base. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, TX (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Durney, C.H., Johnson, C.C.: Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook, 2nd edn. (Report SARTR- 78–22). Brooks (1978)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chou, C.-K.: Evaluation of microwave hyperthermia applicators. Bioelectromagnetics 13(6), 581–597 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bassen, H., Smith, G.: Electric field probes–A review. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 31(5), 710–718 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bassen, H., Herchenroeder, P., Cheung, A., Neuder, S.: Evaluation of an implantable electric-field probe within finite simulated tissues. Radio Sci. 12(6S), 15–25 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hill, D.A.: Waveguide technique for the calibration of miniature implantable electric-field probes for use in microwave-bioeffects studies. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 30(1), 92–99 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stuchly, M.A., Kraszewski, A., Stuchly, S.S.: Implantable electric-field probes-some performance characteristics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 7, 526–531 (1984) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bowman, R.R.: A probe for measuring temperature in radio-frequency-heated material (short papers). IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 24(1), 43–45 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wickersheim, K.A., Sun, M.H.: Fiberoptic thermometry and its applications. J. Microw. Power Electromagn. Energy. 22(2), 85–94 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Balzano, Q., Garay, O., Steel, F.R.: Heating of biological tissue in the induction field of VHF portable radio transmitters. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 27(2), 51–56 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Balzano, Q., Garay, O., Steel, F.R.: Energy deposition in simulated human operators of 800-MHz portable transmitters. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 27(4), 174–181 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Balzano, Q., Garay, O., Steel, F.R..: An attempt to evaluate the exposure of operators of portable radios at 30 MHz. In: Vehicular Technology Conference, 1979. 29th IEEE, Vol. 29, pp. 187–188. IEEE (1979)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guy, A.W., Chou, C.-K.: Specific absorption rates of energy in man models exposed to cellular UHF mobile-antenna fields. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 34(6), 671–680 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guy, A.W.: Analyses of electromagnetic fields induced in biological tissues by thermographic studies on equivalent phantom models. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 16(2), 205–214 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnson, C.C., Guy, A.W.: Nonionizing electromagnetic wave effects in biological materials and systems. Proc. IEEE 60(6), 692–718 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lopresto, V., Pinto, R., De Vita, A., Mancini, S., Galloni, P., Marino, C., Ravazzani, P., Lovisolo, G.A.: Exposure setup to study potential adverse effects at GSM 1800 and UMTS frequencies on the auditory systems of rats. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 123(4), 473–482 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang, J., Lim, E., Leach, M., Wang, Z., Man, K., Huang, Y.: Two methods of SAR measurement for wearable electronic devices. In: Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Vol. 2 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    s p e a g.: https://speag.swiss/products. Last accessed 2018/9/30

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rashid Jamal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rajiv Kumar Singh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ekta Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electronics EnggInstitute of Engineering and TechnologyLucknowIndia
  2. 2.Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical UniversityLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations