Advertisement

BER Performance Evaluation of Different Modulation Techniques for Underwater FSO Communication System

  • Sadanand Yadav
  • Vinay KumarEmail author
  • Sanjay B. Dhok
  • Gaurav Srivastava
  • Akhilendra Pratap Singh
  • Mahesh Kumar Gupta
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 587)

Abstract

Wireless data transmission in the underwater medium is of high importance for applications related to the oil industry, military, and scientific community purposes. In the underwater environment, optical wave propagation experiences scattering effect that produces dispersion and creates inter symbol interference that minimizes the signal-to-noise ratio. This paper evaluates different modulation techniques like Phase Shift Keying (PSK), Differential Phase Shift Keying (DPSK), Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM), and Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) in terms of Bit Error Rate (BER) for four different types of underwater media, viz., pure sea, clean ocean, coastal ocean, and turbid harbor water by assuming the Rayleigh fading channel model and found the best suitable technique for Underwater Free Space Optical (UW-FSO) communication.

Keywords

Underwater free space optical communication Modulation techniques Bit error rate Signal to noise ratio 

References

  1. 1.
    Dalgleish, F.R., Shirron, J.J., Rashkin, D., Giddings, T.E., Dalgleish, A.K.V., Cardei, I., Ouyang, B., Caimi, F.M., Cardei, M.: Physical layer simulator for undersea free-space laser communications. Opt. Eng. 53(5), 1–14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anguita, D., Brizzolara, D., Parodi, G., Hu, Q.: Optical wireless underwater communication for AUV: preliminary simulation and experimental results. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/OES Oceans, Santander, Spain, June 2011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farr, N., Chave, A.D., Freitag, L., Preisig, J., White, S.N., Yoerger, D., Sonnichsen, F.: Optical modem technology for seafloor observatories. In: Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans, Boston, MA, Sept 2006Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yadav, S., Kumar, V.: Optimal clustering in underwater wireless sensor networks: acoustic, EM and FSO communication compliant technique. IEEE Access 5, 12761–12776 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sandeep, D., Kumar, V.: Review on clustering, coverage and connectivity in underwater wireless sensor networks: a communication techniques perspective. IEEE Access 5, 11176–11199 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar, V., Bhusari, R., Dhok, S., Prakash, A., Tripathi, R., Tiwari, S.: Design of magnetic induction based energy efficient WSNs for nonconventional media using multilayer transmitter enabled novel energy model. IEEE Syst. J. (Accepted for publication) (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar, V., Kumar, V., Sandeep, D., Yadav, S., Barik, R.K., Tripathi, R., Tiwari, S.: Multi-hop communication based optimal clustering in hexagon and voronoi cell structured WSNs. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 93, 305–3016 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tambe, S., Kumar, V., Bhusari, R.: Magnetic induction based cluster optimization in non-conventional WSNs: a cross layer approach. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 93, 53–62 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar, V., Yadav, S., Kumar, V., Sengupta, J., Tripathi, R., Tiwari, S.: Optimal clustering in Weibull distributed WSNs based on realistic energy dissipation model. In: Progress in Computing, Analytics and Networking, pp. 61–73. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, V., Yadav, S., Sengupta, J., Kumar, S., Barik, R.K., Tripathi, R., Tiwari, S.: TMSM-based optimal clustering in a Gaussian distributed wireless sensor network. In: TENCON 2017-IEEE Region 10 Conference, Penang, Malaysia (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao, K.D.: Channel Coding Techniques for Wireless Communications. Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simon, M.K., Alouini, M.S.: Digital Communication Over Fading Channels, vol. 95. Wiley (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaushal, H., Kaddoum, G.: Underwater optical wireless communication. IEEE Access 4, 1518–1547 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Han, S., Noh, Y., Liang, R., Chen, R., Cheng, Y., Gerla, M.: Evaluation of underwater optical-acoustic hybrid network. China Commun. 11, 49–59 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giles, J.W., Bankman, I.N.: Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: Basic design considerations. In: Military Communications Conference, MILCOM IEEE, pp. 1700–1705 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sadanand Yadav
    • 1
  • Vinay Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sanjay B. Dhok
    • 2
  • Gaurav Srivastava
    • 3
  • Akhilendra Pratap Singh
    • 4
  • Mahesh Kumar Gupta
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringVisvesvaraya National Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Center of VLSI and Nanotechnology, Visvesvaraya National Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia
  3. 3.Motilal Nehru National Institute of TechnologyAllahabad, PrayagrajIndia
  4. 4.National Institute of TechnologyShillongIndia
  5. 5.RailTel Corporation of IndiaGurugramIndia

Personalised recommendations