Regional Contexts and Regional Research

  • Angela CampbellEmail author
  • Michelle Duffy
  • Beth Edmondson


Recognising opportunity and acknowledging the challenges of conducting research outside of highly resourced major metropolitan centres is strategically important at a time when global connectivity and mobility are increasing and the complexity of “wicked” problems demands more than one approach or solution. Addressing these wicked problems increasingly requires transdisciplinary approaches to better understand and support adaptation and transformation. Expertise in regional research enhances our understanding of how knowledge is constructed and emerges across a range of environments and communities, wherever they are found and however they might be defined.


  1. Brett, J. (2011). Fair share: Country and city in Australia. Quarterly Essay, 42, 1–99. Melbourne: Black Ink.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, N. (2016). Affective Critical Regionality. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Duffy, M. (2010). Sound Ecologies. Cultural Studies Review, 16(1). Retrieved April 23, 2019, from
  4. Fisher, K., Williams, M., FitzHerbert, S., Instone, L., Duffy, M., Wright, S., et al. (2015). Writing difference differently. New Zealand Geographer, 71, 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galvin, K., Reid, R., Fernández-Giménez, M., Kaelo, D., Baival, B., & Krebs, M. (2016). Co-design of transformative research for rangeland sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grove, J. M., Chowdhury, R., Childers, D. (2015, April). Co-design, co-production, and dissemination of social-ecological knowledge to promote sustainability and resilience. GLP News, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  7. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Press.Google Scholar
  8. Marin, A., Ely, A., & van Zwanenberg, P. (2016). Co-design with aligned and non-aligned knowledge partners: Implications for research and coproduction of sustainable food systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Omidvar, O., & Kislov, R. (2014). The evolution of the communities of practice approach: Toward knowledgeability in a landscape of practice – An interview with Etienne Wenger-Trayner. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(3), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pattie, D., & Albiez, S. (2016). Introduction, Brian Eno: A problem of organization. In D. Pattie & S. Albiez (Eds.), Brian Eno Oblique music. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  11. Taylor, W. (2014). Introduction to Australian places, place-making and the politics of displacement in a transient society. In P. Goldswain, N. Sully, & W. Taylor (Eds.), Out of place (Gwalia): Occasional essays on Australian regional communities and built environments in transition (pp. 1–13). Crawley, WA: UWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2013). The UNIDO approach to cluster development key principles and project experiences for inclusive growth. Retrieved April 13, 2019, from
  13. Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2014). Learning in landscapes of practice: A framework. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability (pp. 13–30). London and Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Williams, R. (1973). The city and the country. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Campbell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michelle Duffy
    • 3
  • Beth Edmondson
    • 2
  1. 1.Federation University AustraliaBallaratAustralia
  2. 2.Humanities and Social SciencesFederation University AustraliaChurchillAustralia
  3. 3.University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations