Advertisement

Collective Hope and Action in a Time of Transition: Kitchen Table Conversations with Gippsland Sustainability Change Agents

  • Monica GreenEmail author
  • Sherie McClam
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter stems from a broader research initiative involving a collective of eight Australian and US academics investigating the conditions that affect Education for Sustainability (EfS) educators’ capacity for agency. As part of the wider collective, the two authors of this chapter (one Australian and the other American) collaborated on a small study that examined how sustainability and climate change advocates and educators in Gippsland, Victoria, gain traction in effecting change. Study participants were recruited from two regional committees—RCE Gippsland (Regional Centre of Expertise in Education for Sustainable Development) and the GCCN (Gippsland Climate Change Network)—who each mobilise and disseminate sustainability and climate change information across the region. Using a narrative ethnographic methodology to explore participant perceptions of how they effect change in the region, the authors facilitated two conversational dialogues around two distinctive farmhouse kitchen tables in West Gippsland. Drawing on theories of new materialism and the concept of collective hope, this chapter engages with conversational vignettes generated via the agency of the kitchen tables and shared food. Emergent themes explored in the chapter include the work of EfS change agents and the importance of ‘the collective’ to deal with the challenges and tensions associated with creating change in the regions.

References

  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barr, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2012). Resilient communities: Sustainabilities in transition. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 17(5), 525–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2007). Feminist epistemology after postmodernism: Critiquing science, technology and globalisation. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(1), 65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1179/030801807x183623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, V. (2004a). Preface: Collective hope. Hope, power and governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 592(March), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braithwaite, V. (2004b). The hope process and social inclusion. Hope, power and governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 592(March), 128–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnell, J. (2012). Small change: Understanding cultural action as a resource for unlocking assets and building resilience in communities. Community Development Journal, 48, 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ClimateWorks Australia. (2011). Low carbon growth plan for Gippsland. Retrieved April 26, 2018, from http://climateworks.com.au/publication/document/low-carbon-growth-plan-gippsland
  10. Courville, S., & Piper, N. (2004). Harnessing hope through NGO activism. Hope, power and governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 592(March), 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drahos, P. (2004). Trading in public hope. Hope, power and governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 592(March), 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duhn, I. (2014). Making agency matter: Rethinking infant and toddler agency in educational discourse. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom: Qualitative research, representations & social responsibility. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107–131). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Green, M. (2019). Frog bogs, turbines and biodiversity: Bringing children’s sustainability knowledge to life through hand-made artefacts. In M. Green, S. Plowright, & N. Johnson (Eds.), Educational researchers and the regional university: Agents of regional-global transformation (pp. 153–172). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gruenewald, D. (2003a). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruenewald, D. (2003b). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heshusuis, L. (1994). Freeing ourselves from objectivity: Managing subjectivity or turning toward a participatory mode of consciousness. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollinshead, K. (2010). Tourism studies and confined understanding: The call for a ‘new sense’ of postdisciplinary imaginary. Tourism Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(4), 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howley, C., & Howley, A. (2014). Making senses of rural education research; art, transgressions and other acts of terror. In S. White & M. Corbett (Eds.), Doing educational research in rural settings; methodological issues, international perspectives and practical solutions (pp. 7–25). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hultman, K., & Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2010). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lincoln, Y., & Denzin, N. K. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1047–1065). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Lueck, M. (2007). Hope for a cause as cause for hope: The need for hope in environmental sociology. American Sociology, 38, 250–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London; Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. McClam, S., Cass, A., Connors, C., Frawley, D., Heald, S., McPartlin, A., et al. (2015). Collaboratively creating and sustaining hope and agency. Journal of Sustainability Education, (10), 1–18.Google Scholar
  26. McClam, S., & Sevier, B. (2010). Troubles with grades, grading, and change: Learning from adventures in alternative assessment practices in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1460–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGeer, V. (2004). The art of good hope. Hope, power and governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592, 100–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Needs Assessment Snapshot: Latrobe Local Government Area. (2016). Retrieved October 18, 2018, from https://www.gphn.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Latrobe-FINAL.pdf
  29. Panelli, R. (2010). More-than-human social geographies: Posthuman and other possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Plowright, S., Green, M., & Johnson, N. (2019). Agents of regional–global transformation: Federation University Gippsland Education (FUGuE) researchers. In M. Green, S. Plowright, & N. Johnson (Eds.), Educational researchers and the regional university: Agents of regional-global transformation (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reese, J., & Bamberg, S. (2014). Climate protection needs societal change: Determinants of intention to participate in collective climate action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 466–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing as a method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Riley, K. (2017). Community collaboration and partnership in volatile times. In P. Earley & T. Greany (Eds.), School leadership and education system reform (pp. 139–147). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  35. Sarkissian, W., Hofer, N., Shore, Y., Vajda, S., & Wilkinson, C. (2008). Kitchen table sustainability: Practical recipes for community engagement with sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S., Shorey, H., Rand, K., & Feldman, D. (2003). Hope theory, measurements and applications to school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Somerville, M. (2010). A place pedagogy for ‘global contemporaneity’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(3), 326–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Somerville, M. (2015). Emergent literacies in ‘the land of do anything you want’. In M. Somerville & M. Green (Eds.), Children, place and sustainability (pp. 78–91). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. St. Pierre, E. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stanley, J., Birrell, R., Brain, P., Carey, M., Duffy, M., Ferraro, S., et al. (2013). What would a climate-adapted settlement look like in 2030? A case study of Inverloch and Sandy Point. Retrieved October 18, 2018, from https://www.nccarf.edu.au/synthesis/what-would-climate-adapted-settlement-look-2030-case-study-inverloch-and-sandy-point
  41. Taylor, A., Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Blaise, M. (2012). Editorial. Children’s relations with the more-than-human world. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tichaona, V., & Lupele, C. (2018). Accelerating sustainable solutions at the local level in Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development: Education on the Move. Retrieved January 18, 2018, from https://bangkok.unesco.org/content/unesco-publication-issues-and-trends-education-sustainable-development
  43. Tillmann-Healy, L. M. (2001). Between gay and straight understanding friendship across sexual orientation. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tomaney, J., & Somerville, M. (2010). Climate change and regional identity in Latrobe Valley, Victoria. Australian Humanities Review, 49, 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federation University AustraliaChurchillAustralia
  2. 2.Manhattanville CollegeHarrisonUSA

Personalised recommendations