The Origins of International School Groups

  • Hyejin KimEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)


The transformation of international education involves activities linking different parts of the planet. Three sets of forces established the basis for transnational education firms: neoliberal education reform in the West, the de-nationalization of education, and the internalization of global education hierarchies in Asia.


  1. Au, W., & Hollar, J. (2016). Opting out of the education reform industry. Monthly Review, 67(10), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC News. (2017 June 12). Lilac sky academy trust’s catalogue of ‘irregularities’. Accessed August 8, 2018.
  3. Brooks, R., & Waters, J. (2010). Social networks and educational mobility. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burch, P. (2009). Hidden markets: the new education privatization. New York: Routlege.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohan, W. D. (2017, May 2). Michael Milken invented the modern junk bond, went to prison, and then became one of the most respected people on Wall Street. Business Insider. Accessed June 27, 2018.
  6. Collins, F. L. (2013). Regional pathways: Transnational imaginaries, infrastructures and implications of student mobility within Asia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 22(4), 475–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, F. L., Sidhu, R., Lewis, N., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (2014). Mobility and desire: International students and Asian regionalism in aspirational Singapore. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(5), 661–676.Google Scholar
  8. Dickens, J. (2017, June 7). Accounts reveal shocking financial mismanagement at defunct academy trust. Schools Week. Accessed August 8, 2018.
  9. Earley, P. (1998). School improvement after inspection? School and LEA responses. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Entrich, S. R. (2018). Shadow education and social inequalities in Japan: Evolving patterns and conceptual implications. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falk, M. L., & Graf, A. (2016). Introduction to the issue: Student mobility within Southeast Asia. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 4(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  12. Glass, D. (2014). The international schools market: Data and details of a dynamic global market. Webinar. Accessed January 14, 2015.
  13. Johnson, A. (2012, January 27). City of London academy hits bottom spot. Islington Tribune. Accessed March 2, 2015.
  14. Kim, Y. (2016). Shadow education and the curriculum and culture of schooling in South Korea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein, N. (2008). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Picador.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, M., & Wright, E. (2016). Moving from elite international schools to the world’s elite universities. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 18(2), 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma, Y., & Garcia-Murillo, M. A. (2018). Understanding international students from Asia in American universities: Learning and living globalization. Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Mok, K. (2012). The rise of transnational higher education in Asia. Higher Education Policy, 25(2), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Molnar, A. (2006). The commercial transformation of public education. Journal of Education Policy, 21(5), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olmedo, A. (2013). Policy-makers, market advocates and edu-businesses: New and renewed players in the Spanish education policy arena. Journal of Education Policy, 28(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearson International Schools Community. Accessed June 20, 2018.
  22. Ridge, N. Y., Shami, S., & Kippels, S. (2016). Private education in the absence of a public option: The cases of the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Forum for International Research in Education, 3(2), 41–60.Google Scholar
  23. Roesgaard, M. H. (2006). Japanese education and the cram school business: Functions, challenges and perspectives of the juku. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sahlgreen, G. H. (2010). Schooling for money: Swedish education reforms and the role of the profit motive. Institute of Economic Affairs Discussion Paper, 33. Accessed March 28, 2018.
  25. Saltman, K. J. (2005). The Edison schools: Corporate schooling and the assault on public education. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seth, M. J. (2002). Education fever: Society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sims, T. (2017, August 23). Frankfurt’s international schools see Brexit bonus. Reuters. Accessed December 4, 2017.
  28. Singer, A. (2017, June 2). Pearson and the neo-liberal global assault on public education. Huffington Post. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  29. Smithers, R. (2005, February 4). Woodhead overrode inspectors to fail improving school. The Guardian. Accessed March 13, 2015.
  30. Srivastava, P., & Walford, G. (2016). Non-state actors in education in the Global South. Oxford Review of Education, 42(5), 491–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). The emergence and structuring of the global education industry: Towards an analytical framework. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2016: The global education industry (pp. 1–26). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2017). The emerging global education industry: Analysing market-making in education through market sociology. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(3), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wallace, W. (2005, April 29). Who failed Islington Green? TES Newspaper. Accessed January 12, 2015.
  34. Weale, S. (2015, June 10). ‘It’s a political failure’: How Sweden’s celebrated schools system fell into crisis. The Guardian. Accessed May 5, 2018.
  35. Wiborg, S. (2014, September 9). The big winners from Sweden’s for-profit ‘free’ schools are companies, not pupils. The Conversation. Accessed December 3, 2017.
  36. Wiborg, S. (2015). Privatizing education: Free school policy in Sweden and England. Comparative Education Review, 59(3), 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wigmore, T. (2016, June 18). Why Sweden’s free schools are failing. NewStatesman. Accessed February 15, 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations