Advertisement

People in Place: Placemaking Fundamentals

  • Iderlina Mateo-BabianoEmail author
  • Gini Lee
Chapter

Abstract

Placemaking is the continuous process of shaping, experiencing and contributing to ‘place’. ‘Place’ itself is a multidimensional construct, referring to a locality but also the relationships that occur within the locality, including the socio-economic reality, ecological conditions and political standpoint. Placemaking places people at its core, either by employing a participatory process to public space design, gaining an understanding of residents’ perceptions and aspirations or responding through projects/programmes, which generate positive relationships in/to/with place. Placemaking is a process that creates the capacity for people to invest space with meaning. This chapter introduces the fundamentals of place and placemaking. It begins by exploring the most common definitions of place. It then presents Place Agency’s 5P framework of placemaking, which deliberates a more systematic way of shaping places. By recognising that placemaking is purpose-driven, it engages in a focused discussion on why the shaping of places matters and introduces several placemaking strategies, supported by examples in Australia and internationally. The chapter culminates with the Placemaking Sandbox workshop delivered during the World Urban Forum in 2018, which presented placemaking as a capacity-building strategy to harness the power of community in shaping and transforming places in Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia).

Keywords

Placemaking Place Placemaking sandbox Capacity building Sustainable development goals (SDGs) 

References

  1. Arefi, M. (2014). Deconstructing placemaking: Needs, opportunities, and assets. Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Augé, M. (2009). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity (new ed.). London, UK: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  3. Beer, T., Lanxing, F., & Hernández-Santín, C. (2018). Scenographer as placemaker: Co-creating communities through The Living Stage NYC. Theatre and Performance Design, 4(4), 342–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casey, E. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. London and Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coghlan, A., Sparks, B., Liu, W., & Winlaw, M. (2017). Reconnecting with place through events: Collaborating with precinct managers in the placemaking agenda. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 8(1), 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coombs, G. (2012). Park(ing) day. Contexts, 11(3), 64–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. David, J., & Hammond, R. (2011). High line: The inside story of New York City’s park in the sky. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  8. Dempsey, N., & Burton, M. (2012). Defining place-keeping: The long-term management of public spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(1), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engwicht, D. (1995). Reclaiming our cities & towns: Better living with less traffic/Review. Alternatives Journal, 21(3), 41.Google Scholar
  10. Friedmann, J. (2007). Reflections on place and place‐making in the cities of China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2003). Guest’s editors’ introduction: Restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 103–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00108-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henshaw, V. (2013). Urban smellscapes: Understanding and designing city smell environments. New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iveson, K. (2007). Publics and the city. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1995). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. P. (1996). Assets-based community development. National Civic Review, 85(4), 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerner, J. (2014). Urban acupuncture. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lippard, L. R. (1997). The lure of the local: Senses of place in a multicentered society. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  19. Malpas, J. (2015). Place and singularity. In J. Malpas (Ed.), The intelligence of place: Topographies and poetics (pp. 65–92). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  20. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York: Rizzoli International Publication.Google Scholar
  21. Ogunseitan, O. A. (2004). Topophilia and the quality of life. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(2), 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Potter, E. (2012). Introduction: Making Indigenous place in the Australian city. Postcolonial Studies, 15(2), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Project for Public Spaces (PPS). (2007). What is placemaking? Retrieved from https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking.
  24. Project for Public Spaces (PPS). (2008). Placemaking for communities. Retrieved from www.pps.org.
  25. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  26. Relph, E. (2008). A pragmatic sense of place. In F. M. Vanclay, M. Higgins, & A. Blackshaw (Eds.), Making sense of place (pp. 311–332). Canberra: National Museum of Australia Press.Google Scholar
  27. Relph, E. (2017). A pragmatic sense of place and the future of places. Placeness, Place, Placelessness. Retrieved from http://www.placeness.com/a-pragmatic-sense-of-place-and-the-future-of-places/.
  28. Richards, G. (2017). From place branding to placemaking: The role of events. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 8(1), 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Talen, E. (2015). Do-it-yourself urbanism: A history. Journal of Planning History, 14(2), 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Tuan, Y. F. (2001). Space and place: The perspective of experience. 1977. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  32. United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN Habitat). (2018). New Urban Agenda. Habitat3.Org. Retrieved from http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf.
  33. United Nations (UN). (2017). About the sustainable development goals. In United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
  34. Village Well. (2019). Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.villagewell.org/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Architecture, Building and PlanningUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations