Conceptual Framework to Social Life Cycle Assessment of e-Waste Management: A Case Study in the City of Rio de Janeiro

  • Leonardo Mangia Rodrigues
  • Ana Carolina Maia Angelo
  • Lino Guimarães MarujoEmail author


Opposing the problems generated by the negative impacts of industrial production, the corporations, on behalf of minimizing the impacting branches of its reality, over the last four decades, are trying to incorporate frameworks focused on the appliance of the sustainability on its processes. During the last 20 years, a small but growing portion of companies is volunteering to attach social and environmental issues to its business models. One of the major recent issues on production management is about the generated waste, post-consumption matters, and aspects of the reverse logistics, in other words a framework of solid waste management that covers the products’ end-of-life. On developing countries, these models are only on its initial phase. There is no regulatory concern on the topic and no economic incentives, and the people who collect this kind of material do not have any instruction on how to do it, regarding its risks to health, safety, and the environment. Setting off on the recognition of the system’s limits and the major actors involved on its process of solid waste management is a necessity, elaborating the positive and negative social aspects linked to this activity, starting from the product life cycle way of thinking. The purpose of this chapter is to present and analyze the social impacts of the solid waste management specifically regarding the waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), taking the city of Rio de Janeiro as a case study.


Social life cycle assessment Solid waste management Waste electrical and electronic equipment 


  1. Allesch A, Brunner PH (2014) Assessment methods for solid waste management: a literature review. Waste Manag Res 32:461–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelo ACM, Saraiva AB, Climaco JCN, Durange CEI, Valle RAB (2017) Life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis: selection of a strategy for domestic food waste management in Rio de Janeiro. J Clean Prod 143:744–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aparcana S, Hinostroza M (2015) Guidebook for the development of nationally appropriate mitigation actions on sustainable municipal waste management. UNEP DTU. ISBN:978-87-93130-59-3Google Scholar
  4. Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013) Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):1106–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arcese G, Lucchetti MC, Massa I (2017) Modeling social life cycle assessment framework for the Italian wine sector. J Clean Prod 140:1027–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldé CP, Forti V, Gray V, Kuehr R, Stegmann P (2017) The global e-waste monitor 2017: quantities, flows and resources. United Nations University, International Telecommunication Union, and International Solid Waste AssociationGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstad SSA (2012) Household food waste management – evaluations of current status and potential improvements using life-cycle assessment methodology. PhD-thesis, LTH, Lund University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  8. Caiado N, Guarnieri P, Xavier LH, Chaves GDLD (2017) A characterization of the Brazilian market of reverse logistic credits (RLC) and an analogy with the existing carbon credit market. Resour Conserv Recycl 118:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao J, Chen Y, Shi B, Lu B, Zhang X, Ye X et al (2016) WEEE recycling in Zhejiang province, China: generation, treatment, and public awareness. J Clean Prod 127:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Souza RG, Clímaco JCN, Sant’Anna AP, Rocha TB, do Valle RDAB, Quelhas OLG (2016) Sustainability assessment and prioritisation of e-waste management options in Brazil. Waste Manag 57:46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demajorovic J, Augusto EEF, De Souza MTS (2016) Logística reversa de REEE em países em desenvolvimento: desafios e perspectivas para o modelo brasileiro. Ambiente Sociedade 19(2):119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dias P, Machado A, Huda N, Bernardes AM (2018) Waste electric and electronic equipment (WEEE) management: a study on the Brazilian recycling routes. J Clean Prod 174:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission (2005) European waste framework directive.
  14. European Commission (2008) Thematic strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources.
  15. Guarnieri P, de Silva LC, Levino NA (2016) Analysis of electronic waste reverse logistics decisions using strategic options development analysis methodology: a Brazilian case. J Clean Prod 133:1105–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Islam, MT, Huda N (2018). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)/E-waste: a comprehensive literature review.” Resour Conserv Recycl 137 (October). Elsevier:48–75. Scholar
  17. Jørgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(4):376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilic HS, Cebeci U, Ayhan MB (2015) Reverse logistics system design for the waste of electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Turkey. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul J, Bernstad A, Niero M, Gentil E, Hauschild MZ, Christensen TH (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – part I: lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manag 34:573–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manfredi S, Pant R, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2011) Supporting environmentally sound decisions for bio-waste management a practical guide to Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Publications Office, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  21. Moriizumi Y, Matsui N, Hondo H (2010) Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand. J Clean Prod 18:1629–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ottoni MDSO, do Nascimento HF, Xavier LH (2018) Geração de resíduos eletroeletrônicos no Estado do Rio de Janeiro: logística reversa a partir dos pontos de entrega voluntária (PEVS). 1° Congresso Sul-Americano de Resíduos Sólidos e Sustentabilidade, Gramado-RS, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  23. Petti L, Serreli M, Di Cesare S (2016) Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. Social LCA in progress.
  24. Schluep M, Hagelueken C, Kuehr R, Magalini F, Maurer C, Meskers C, Mueller E, Wang F (2009) Recycling from e-waste to resources: sustainable innovation and technology transfer industrial sector studies. UNEP-UNU, Solving the E-waste Problem (StEP), Bonn. Disponível em
  25. Schmidheiny S (1992) Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment. MIT press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Srivastava V, Ismail SA, Singh P, Singh RP (2015) Urban solid waste management in the developing world with emphasis on India: challenges and opportunities. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 14:317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Umair S, Björklund A, Petersen EE (2015) Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using UNEP SETAC guidelines. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UNEP. United Nations Environment Programme (2006) LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT – a bridge to sustainable products. United Nations Environment ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  29. UNEP. United Nations Environment Programme (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, ParisGoogle Scholar
  30. UNEP. United Nations Environment Programme (2013) The methodological sheets of sub-categories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (sLCA). Pre-publication version. Available at
  31. Vinyes E, Oliver-Solà J, Ugaya C et al (2013) Application of LCSA to used cooking oil waste management. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xiao Z, Sun J, Shu W, Wang T (2019) Location-allocation problem of reverse logistics for end-of-life vehicles based on the measurement of carbon emissions. Comput Ind Eng 127((January). Pergamon):169–181. Scholar
  33. WCED (1987) Out common future. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Mangia Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Ana Carolina Maia Angelo
    • 2
  • Lino Guimarães Marujo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Federal University of Rio de Janeiro – UFRJRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Fluminense Federal University – UFFVolta RedondaBrazil

Personalised recommendations