Managing the Mekong River Conflicts: Political Stability at the Cost of Local Communities

  • Suwit Laohasiriwong
  • Mikio OishiEmail author


The Mekong River, one of the great rivers of the world, travels from the Tibetan Plateau through six countries before flowing into the South China Sea. It crosses a region highly diverse and rich in cultural and environmental terms. The diversity and wealth provide a potential for both conflict and cooperation, as the different countries have different kinds of plans and needs in relation to the river and its resources. This chapter focuses on the conflicts that take place at different levels and among different types of stakeholders in the Mekong River Basin and identifies three types of incompatibilities that exist in these conflicts: (1) incompatibilities between China and the Lower Mekong Basin countries, (2) incompatibilities among the Lower Mekong Basin countries themselves and (3) incompatibilities between local communities and development interests. The chapter first discusses that the Mekong River Commission, the only intergovernmental organization dedicated to the sustainable management of the resources of the Mekong River, possesses the limited capability to effectively and fundamentally address the incompatibilities. It then examines the ways in which the three types of incompatibilities have been handled. As a result, a pattern of incompatibility management in the Mekong River conflicts can be identified. Namely, incompatibilities at the interstate level tend to be manoeuvred around and side-lined, while incompatibilities at the local level are envisaged to be absorbed by local communities and dissipate. In this manner, the political stability of the Mekong River Basin may be achieved, but it is at the cost of the local population and natural environment. The main challenge for incompatibility management in the Mekong River conflicts is to enhance the capability of the decision-making process that would be highly sensitive and responsive to the voices of the population at the local level.


Mekong River conflicts Mekong River Commission-China ASEAN way of conflict management Manoeuvring around Absorbing incompatibilities 


  1. Armstrong, S. C. (2015). Water is for fighting: Transnational legal disputes in the Mekong River Basin. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 17(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  2. Asian Development Bank. (undated). Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). Accessed 27 Mar 2019.
  3. Blake, D. (2001). Proposed Mekong dam scheme in China threatens millions in downstream countries. World River Review, 16(3), 4–5.Google Scholar
  4. Chellaney, B. (2013). Water: Asia’s new battleground. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, X., & Stone, C. (2013). Asia pathways, The PRC in the Greater Mekong Subregion: Economic and political implications. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
  6. Chiang, B., & Cheng, J. C. (2015). Changing landscape and changing ethnoscape in Lao PDR: On PRC’s participation in the Great Mekong Subregion development. In Y. Santasombat (Ed.), Impact of China’s rise on the Mekong region (pp. 85–115). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cronin, R. (2010). Mekong dams and the perils of peace. Survival, 51(6), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Druce, S. C., & Baikoeni, E. Y. (2016). Circumventing conflict: The Indonesia-Malaysia Ambalat block dispute. In M. Oishi (Ed.), Contemporary conflict in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management (pp. 137–156). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elhance, A. P. (1999). Hydropolitics in the 3rd world: Conflict and cooperation in international river basins. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eriksson, M., Nutter, J., Day, S., Guttman, H., James, R., & Quibell, G. (2015). Challenges and commonalities in basin-wide water management. Aquatic Procedia, 5, 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fawthrop, T. (2014, December 29). The growing Mekong controversy. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  12. Fiorino, D. J. (2001). Environmental policy as learning: A new view of an old landscape. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 322–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleick, P. H., & Heberger, M. (2014). Water conflict chronology. In N. Ajami et al. (Eds.), The world’s water. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goh, E. (2004). China in the Mekong River Basin: The regional security implications of resource development on the Lancang Jiang (Working Paper 69). Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Goh, E. (2007). Developing the Mekong: Regionalism and regional security in China-Southeast Asian relations. The Adelphi Paper No. 387. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Hensengerth, O. (2009). Transboundary river cooperation and the regional public good: The case of the Mekong River. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 31(2), 326–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herbertson, K. (2012, November 13). Xayaburi Dam: A closer look at how Laos got to “go”. International Rivers.“go”. Accessed 15 Mar 2016.
  18. Herbertson, K. (2013, August 15). The Mekong dams dispute: Four trends to watch. International Rivers. Accessed 10 Apr 2016.
  19. Ho, S. (2014). River politics: China’s policies in the Mekong and the Brahmaputra in comparative perspective. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(85), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunt, L. (2016, January 22) Mekong River Commission faces radical change. The Diplomat. Accessed 25 Mar 2016.
  21. International Rivers. (2015). The Don Sahong Dam: Gambling with Mekong food security and livelihoods., Accessed 25 Mar 2016.
  22. Janssen, P. (2018, August 15). Potential upsides emerge from Lao dam disaster. Asia Times Online. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.
  23. Keo, S. (2014). Transboundary water conflict: A case studies of the Mekong River Basin. Unpublished paper. Accessed 5 Apr 2016.
  24. Kurlantzick, J. (2007). Charm offensive: How China’s soft power is transforming the world. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Laohasiriwong, S. (2010). Natural resource conflicts in Southeast Asia. Bangkok: Trendnovation Southeast.Google Scholar
  26. Matthews, N., & Motta, S. (2013). China’s influence on hydropower development in the Lancang River and Lower Mekong River Basin (State of Knowledge Series 4). Vientiane: CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems.Google Scholar
  27. McGirk, J. (2003, January 31). The actress, the temple and the alleged remark that brought two nations to the brink of war. Independent. Accessed 28 Jan 2019.
  28. Mekong River Commission. (1995). Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River Basin. Chiang Rai: Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  29. Mekong River Commission. (2016). Mekong River Commission. Accessed 20 Feb 2016.
  30. Nijhuis, M. (2014, July 12). Dam projects ignite a legal battle over Mekong River’s future. National Geographic. Accessed 27 Feb 2016.
  31. Oishi, M. (2016). Introduction: The ASEAN way of conflict management under challenge. In M. Oishi (Ed.), Contemporary conflict in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management (pp. 1–17). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Osborne, M. (2009). The Mekong River under threat. Lowy rj 27. Lowy Institute for International Policy. Double Bay: Longueville Media.Google Scholar
  33. Pearse-Smith, S. W. D. (2012). “Water war” in the Mekong Basin? Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 53(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Radosevich, G., & Olson, D. (1999). Existing and emerging basin arrangements in Asia: Mekong River Commission case study. Paper presented at the 3rd workshop on River Basin Institution Development in Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  35. Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2007). Power, development, and institutional changes: Participatory governance in the Lower Mekong Basin. World Development, 35(12), 2169–2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sotharith, C. (2007). How can Mekong region maximize the benefits of economic integration: A Cambodian perspective (CICP Working Paper No. 16). Phnom Penh: Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace.Google Scholar
  37. Sticklor, R. (2010, December 01). Managing the Mekong: Conflict or compromise? New Security Beat. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
  38. Thim, L. (2010). Planning the Lower Mekong Basin: Social intervention on the Se San River. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. Tiezzi, S. (2016). Facing Mekong drought, China to release water from Yunnan dam. The Diplomat. Accessed 15 Apr 2016.
  40. UNEP. (2008). Vital water graphics. Accessed 14 Mar 2016.
  41. Varis, O., Keskinen, M., & Kummu, M. (2008). Mekong at the crossroads. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 37(3), 146–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiriyapong, N. (2012, April 25). Mekong plans anger riverside communities. Bangkok Post. Accessed 29 Mar 2016.
  43. Wolf, A. T., & Newton, J. T. (2001). Case study of transboundary dispute resolution: The Mekong Committee. Accessed 10 Mar 2016.
  44. Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). Conflict and cooperation within international river basins: The importance of institutional capacity (Vol. 125, pp. 31–40). Universities Council on Water Resources, Water Resources Update.Google Scholar
  45. Zaffos, J. (2014). Life on Mekong faces threats as major dams begin to rise. Yale Environment, 360. Accessed 8 Apr 2016.
  46. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Khon Kaen UniversityKhon KaenThailand
  2. 2.Universiti Malaysia SabahKota KinabaluMalaysia

Personalised recommendations