Advertisement

Risk Governance and the Role of the Informal Sector in Disaster Recovery: The Case of 2015 Nepal Earthquake

  • Ranit ChatterjeeEmail author
  • Kenji Okazaki
Conference paper
Part of the Disaster Risk Reduction book series (DRR)

Abstract

This chapter is a case study focusing on disaster governance and its implications on the informal sector’s recovery process in the aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquake. The recovery framework of the government is analyzed with respect to the observed ground-level implementation and experiences shared by business owners to see its effectiveness in addressing the informal sectors recovery needs. The findings highlight the need to shift from monocentric to polycentric approach, have more access to the recovery process, and need for better rules and regulations and coordination, among others.

Keywords

Disaster recovery Private sector Nepal earthquake Risk governance Informal sector 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support extended by Prof. Basanta Raj Adhikary from Center of disaster studies, Tribhuvan University, Nepal, for sharing insights of Nepal earthquake recovery process and supporting data collection. Further, we are thankful to Mr. Bikesh Pradhan, Anil Tuladhar, and the student interns who supported the data collection in the study areas. Lastly, the first author thankfully acknowledges MEXT scholarship and GSS research fund for supporting the study.

References

  1. Ahrens J, Rudolph PM (2006) The importance of governance in risk reduction and disaster management. J Conting Crisis Manag 14(4):207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amatya S, Pal I, Chatterjee R (2017) Assessment of coordination mechanism in 2015 Nepal Earthquake, Kathmandu District. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317041566_Assessment_of_Coordination_Mechanism_in_2015_Nepal_Earthquake_Kathmandu_District. Accessed 1 Oct 2017
  3. Bates LF, Peacock GW (1989) Long term recovery January. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 7(3):349–365Google Scholar
  4. Bosher L (2014) Built-in resilience through disaster risk reduction: operational issues. Build Res Inf 42(2):240–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.858203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers R, Conway GR (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century, discussion paper 296. Institute of Development Studies, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamlagain D (2009) Earthquake scenario and recent efforts toward earthquake risk reduction in NepalGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatterjee R, Okazaki K (2017) Household livelihood recovery after 2015 Nepal earthquake in informal economy: case study of shop owners in Bungamati, Procedia Engineering (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Chatterjee R, Shiwaku K, Gupta RD, Nakano G, Shaw R (2015) Bangkok to Sendai and beyond: implications for disaster risk reduction in Asia. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6(2):177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chatterjee R, Okazaki K, Shaw R (2017) Understanding recovery process of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) after 2015 Nepal earthquake and impact on resilience building (Chap. 16). In: Science and technology in disaster risk reduction, pp 253–272Google Scholar
  10. Clague C (1997) Institutions and economic development. Growth and governance in less-developed and post-socialist countries. John Hopkins University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Djalante R, Thomalla F, Sinapoy MS, Carnegie M (2012) Building resilience to natural hazards in Indonesia: progress and challenges in implementing the Hyogo framework for action. Nat Hazards 62(3):779–803.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0106-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gall M, Cutter SL, Nguyen K (2014) Governance in disaster risk management (IRDR AIRDR Publication No. 3). Integrated Research on Disaster Risk, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  13. Gautam S, Chatterjee R, Raj Adhikary B (2017) Business recovery after Gorkha earthquake 2015 in Nepal. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317041727_Business_recovery_after_Gorkha_earthquake_2015_in_Nepal. Accessed 1 Oct 2017
  14. Gotham KF, Campanella R (2011) Coupled vulnerability and resilience: the dynamics of cross-scale interactions in Post-Katrina New Orleans. Ecol Soc 16(3).  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-04292-160312
  15. Guarnacci U (2012) Governance for sustainable reconstruction after disasters: lessons from Nias, Indonesia. Environ Dev 2:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holley C, Gunningham N, Shearing C (2011) The new environmental governance. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hussmanns R (2005) Measuring the informal economy: from employment in the informal sector to informal employment. International Labour Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. IFRC (2011) Analysis of legislation related to disaster risk reduction in Nepal. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  19. ILO (2004) Social protection for people in the informal economy of Nepal, ILO Kathmandu 2004. ISBN 92-2-115348-7Google Scholar
  20. Jha AK, Stanton-Geddes Z (2013) Strong, safe, and resilient: strategic policy guide for disaster risk management in East Asia and the PacificGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones S, Oven K, Manyena B, Aryal K (2014) Governance struggles and policy processes in disaster risk reduction: a case study from Nepal. Geoforum 57(2014):78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kapucu N, Arslan T, Collins ML (2010) Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: toward a network-centered approach. Adm Soc 42(2):222–247.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710362517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lassa J (2013) Disaster policy change in Indonesia 1930–2010: from government to governance. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 31(2):130–159Google Scholar
  24. Li H, Joyeeta G, Pieter VM (2012) China’s governance structure on drought disaster in rural areas. Disaster Adv 5(4):976–980Google Scholar
  25. Li H, Gupta J, Van Dijk MP (2013) China’s drought strategies in rural areas along the Lancang River. Water Policy 15(1):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2012.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ministry of Finance (MoF) (2013) Foreign aid in Nepal, FY 2011–12. Kathmandu: International Economic Cooperation Coordination Division, Ministry of Finance (MoF), Government of Nepal, MoHA, 1982Google Scholar
  27. National Reconstruction Authority (NRA) (2016) Post disaster recovery framework (2016–2020) Government of NepalGoogle Scholar
  28. Niggs JM (1995) Disaster recovery as a social process. Research Center University of Delaware Newark, Preliminary Paper 219Google Scholar
  29. NPC (2015) Post disaster needs assessment. Government of NepalGoogle Scholar
  30. Ojha HR, Cameron J, Kumar C (2009) Deliberation or symbolic violence? The governance of community forestry in Nepal. For Policy Econ 11(2009):365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pandey S (2012) The politics of foreign aid. Nepali Times. Issue 620, 31 Aug 2012–6 Sept 2012Google Scholar
  32. Plummer R, Armitage D (2007) A resilience-based framework for evaluating co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecol Econ 61:62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shrestha BK (nd) Transformation of Machendra Bahal at Bungamati—conservation and management plan. Accessed at https://www.academia.edu/7483676/Transformation_of_Machendra_Bahal_at_Bungamati_-_Conservation_and_Management_Plan_
  34. Shrestha N, Sharma A, Shaw R (2015) Employment focused disaster risk management and reconstruction in Asia-Pacific region: Nepal case study (copy with author)Google Scholar
  35. Suwal R, Pant B (2009) Measuring informal sector economic activities in Nepal session number: Paper prepared for the Special IARIW-SAIM Conference; Session 7, 25 Sept 2009Google Scholar
  36. Tierney K (2012) Disaster governance: social, political, and economic dimensions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:341–363.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Timalsina PK (2011) An urban informal economy: livelihood opportunity to poor or challenges for urban governance, study of street vending activities of Kathmandu Metropolitan City. Int J Polit Good Gov 2(2.2). Quarter II 2011, ISSN: 0976-1195Google Scholar
  38. Underdal A (2010) Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance. Glob Environ Change 20(3):386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. UNDP, UNISDR and IRP (nd) The guidance note on recovery: governance. Accessed online at http://www.unisdr.org/files/16774_16774guidancenoteonrecoverygovernan.pdf
  40. UNDP (2006) Local governance in Tsunami recovery: lessons learned and emerging principles. Retrieved 21 Dec 2009, from UNDP Regional Centre in Bangkok Serving the Asia Pacific: Accessed online at: http://regionalcentrebangkok.undp.or.th/practices/governance/documents/Local_Go v_Tsunami_Recovery-200601.pdf
  41. UNESCAP (2009) What is good governance? Accessed online at: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
  42. UN-Habitat Report (2016) Socio-economic household survey (printed copy available with author)Google Scholar
  43. UNISDR (2010) Local governments and disaster risk reduction: good practices and lessons learned. Accessed online at: http://www.preventionweb.net/files/13627_LocalGovernmentsandDisasterRiskRedu.Pdf
  44. UNISDR (2011) Reforming risk governance (Chap. 7). In: Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams G (2011) Study on disaster risk reduction, decentralization and political economy. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction (GAR)Google Scholar
  46. World Economic Forum (WEF) Insight Report (2015) Global Risks 2015, 10th ednGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Global Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations