DMAIC Approach to Improve Carbon Weighing Compliance of Banburry Machine

  • Saurabh VaidyaEmail author
  • Santosh Bhosle
  • Prashant Ambad
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1025)


The research work done for improvement in carbon weighing compliance of mixing system of banburry machine is presented in this paper. As the carbon is one of the essential raw agents used in process of tire manufacturing. The carbon handling and transporting system used in banburry machine mixing process is one of the critical processes. Carbon weighing compliance is also known as efficiency of carbon usage. Plant optimization pillars are used for process improvements, new product developments, reducing breakdowns and improving product quality. This research work is mainly focused on the application of DMAIC phases (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) along with terotechnology to improve the value of carbon weighing compliance of mixing system by reducing the carbon breakdowns which occur repetitively. The top five carbon breakdowns were identified by analyzing the data of carbon breakdowns of year 2017 thoroughly. Application of DMAIC phases helped in creating new inspection checklists for the effective preventive maintenance of the carbon handling and transporting system of banburry machine. The average value of carbon weighing compliance is increased by 7.5542% (from 89.35 to 96.91%) and the reduction in average downtime is 16.92% (from 490.33 to 407.33 min).


Carbon weighing compliance Plant optimization Machine breakdowns DMAIC phases Preventive maintenance 



Hereby I would like to thank the Goodyear South Asia Tyres Private limited, Aurangabad for giving me the opportunity for completing my M-Tech Dissertation Project. I am very thankful to my industrial guide Mr. Anish Kumar, Manager, Goodyear South Asia Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad for guiding me throughout the completion of my dissertation work at industry.


  1. 1.
    Azizi, A.: Evaluation improvement of production productivity performance using statistical process control, overall equipment efficiency, and autonomous maintenance. Proced. Manuf. 2, 186–190 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Savsar, M.: Performance analysis of an FMS operating under different failure rates and maintenance policies. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 16(3), 229–249 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Plant Optimization. Milliken Institute, Shanghai (Good Year South Asia Tyres Pvt. Ltd.)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lomtea, R.U., Bhosleb, S.P., Ambadc, P.M., Gaikwadd, R.A.: Reliability improvement for TSR machine of Banburry mixer using plant optimization process. Des. Eng. 2351, 9789 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bengtsson, M., Kurdve, M.: Machining equipment life cycle costing model with dynamic maintenance cost. Proced. CIRP 48, 102–107 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbosa, B., Pereira, M.T., Silva, F.J.G., Campilho, R.D.S.G.: Solving quality problems in tyre production preparation process: a practical approach. Proced. Manuf. 11, 1239–1246 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jayswal, A., Li, X., Zanwar, A., Lou, H.H., Huang, Y.: A sustainability root cause analysis methodology and its application. Comput. Chem. Eng. 35(12), 2786–2798 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srinivasan, K., Muthu, S., Devadasan, S.R., Sugumaran, C.: Enhancing effectiveness of shell and tube heat exchanger through six sigma DMAIC phases. Proced. Eng. 97, 2064–2071 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Youssouf, A., Rachid, C., Ion, V.: Contribution to the optimization of strategy of maintenance by lean six sigma. Phys. Proced. 55, 512–518 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumaravadivel, A., Natarajan, U.: application of six-sigma DMAIC methodology to sand-casting process with response surface methodology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 69(5–8), 1403–1420 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garg, A., Deshmukh, S.G.: Flexibility in maintenance: a framework. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 10(2), 21–33 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tong, J.P.C., Tsung, F., Yen, B.P.C.: A DMAIC approach to printed circuit board quality improvement. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 23(7–8), 523–531 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Das, P., Nath, T.: Root cause analysis of the major equipment breakdown problems of the tube section of a FMCG company as an approach to improve OEE. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. (IJETT) 27(4), 207–213 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carlson, J.S., Söderberg, R.: Assembly root cause analysis: a way to reduce dimensional variation in assembled products. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 15(2), 113–150 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gejdoš, P.: Continuous quality improvement by statistical process control. Proced. Econ. Finance 34, 565–572 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, M.H.C., Al-Refaie, A., Yang, C.Y.: DMAIC approach to improve the capability of SMT solder printing process. IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manuf. 31(2), 126–133 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mehrabi, J.: Application of Six-Sigma in educational quality management. Proced. Soc. Behav. Sci. 47, 1358–1362 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Costa, T., Silva, F.J.G., Ferreira, L.P.: Improve the extrusion process in tire production using Six Sigma methodology. Proced. Manuf. 13, 1104–1111 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saurabh Vaidya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Santosh Bhosle
    • 1
  • Prashant Ambad
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentMaharashtra Institute TechnologyAurangabadIndia

Personalised recommendations