Nanofinishing of External Cylindrical Surface of C60 Steel Using Rotating Core-Based Magnetorheological Finishing Process

  • Manpreet Singh
  • Ashpreet SinghEmail author
  • Anant Kumar Singh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)


A rotating core-based magnetorheological finishing process has been developed for nanofinishing of external cylindrical surfaces. Shaft made of steel grade C60 is taken as workpiece, which finds its application in manufacturing of various automotive products such as crankshafts, rocker arm shafts, and steering tie rods. The present work involved the parametric studying the developed magnetorheological finishing process. To plan and examine the effect of process parameters, namely, current, tool core’s rotation, workpiece rotation and abrasives concentration on the percentage change in surface roughness, the response surface methodology has been employed. Examination of the experimental data depicted that the large contribution to response variable is made by the current and tool speed, which is followed by the rotational speed of cylindrical workpiece and abrasives concentration. The initial surface roughness value of 320 nm reduced to a final value of 52 nm in finishing time of 90 min with optimized parameters.


Cylindrical external surfaces Magnetorheological finishing Response surface methodology Surface roughness 


  1. 1.
    Jain, V.K., Jayswal, S.C., Dixit, P.M.: Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetic abrasive finishing using non-uniform surface profiles. Mater. Manuf. Process. 22(2), 256–270 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barman, A., Das, M.: Design and fabrication of a novel polishing tool for finishing freeform surfaces in magnetic field assisted finishing (MFAF) process. Precis. Eng. 49, 61–68 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hashimoto, F., Yamaguchi, H., Krajnik, P., Wegener, K.: Abrasive fine-finishing technology. CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol. 65(2), 597–620 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bedi, T.S., Singh, A.K.: Magnetorheological methods for nanofinishing—a review. Part. Sci. Technol. 34(4), 412–422 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jain, V.K.: Magnetic field assisted abrasive based micro-nano-finishing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(20), 6022–6038 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh, A.K., Jha, S., Pandey, P.M.: Parametric analysis of an improved ball end magnetorheological finishing process. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 226(9), 1550–1563 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, G., Singh, A.K., Garg, P.: Development of magnetorheological finishing process for external cylindrical surfaces. Mater. Manuf. Process. 32(5), 581–588 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maan, S., Singh, G., Singh, A.K.: Nano-surface-finishing of permanent mold punch using magnetorheological fluid-based finishing processes. Mater. Manuf. Process. 32(9), 1004–1010 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThapar Institute of Engineering and TechnologyPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations