Advertisement

A Novel Magnetorheological Grinding Process for Finishing the Internal Cylindrical Surfaces

  • Ankit Aggarwal
  • Anant Kumar SinghEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

A novel magnetorheological grinding process is introduced to finish the inner cylindrical surface of the workpiece. In this approach, magnetorheological polishing fluid is used as a medium for the finishing of the inner cylindrical surface. The magnetorheological grinding tool helps to slash away the roughness peaks present on the workpiece surface. The simulation along with experimentation is performed to validate the effectiveness of the process. The input parameters such as current, tool reciprocation speed, tool, and workpiece rotation speed are considered for experimentation. The output parameter is observed in terms of change in surface roughness value from 250 to 110 nm in 60 min of finishing time. The roughness profiles and scanning electron microscope images proved the efficacy of the developed magnetorheological grinding process. This process can finish the internal cylindrical surfaces for industrial applications such as cylindrical molds, dies, hydraulic cylinders, etc.

Keywords

Magnetorheological fluid Magnetorheological grinding tool Magnetic flux density Surface roughness 

References

  1. 1.
    Baron, Y.M.: Technology of Abrasive Finishing in the Magnetic Field. Masino-strojenije, Leningrad (1975)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jain, V.K.: Magnetic field assisted abrasive based micro-nano-finishing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(20), 6022–6038 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shinmura, T., Yamaguchi, H.: Study on a new internal finishing process by the application of magnetic abrasive machining: internal finishing of stainless-steel tube and clean gas bomb. JSME Int. J. Ser. C Dyn. Control Robot. Des. Manuf. 38(4), 795–804 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang, Y.P., Hashimura, M., Dornfeld, D.A.: An investigation of material removal mechanism in lapping with grain size transition. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 122(3), 413–419 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, C.H., Cai, G.Q., Xiu, S.C., Li, Q.: Material removal model and experimental verification for abrasive jet precision finishing with wheel as restraint. Key Eng. Mater. 304, 555–559 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gorana, V.K., Jain, V.K., Lal, G.K.: Experimental investigation into cutting forces and active grain density during abrasive flow machining. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44(2–3), 201–211 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bedi, T.S., Singh, A.K.: A new magnetorheological finishing process for ferromagnetic cylindrical honing surfaces. Mater. Manuf. Process. 33(11), 1141–1149 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barletta, M., Tagliaferri, V.: Development of an abrasive jet machining system assisted by two fluidized beds for internal polishing of circular tubes. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 46(3–4), 271–283 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, J.D., Kang, Y.H., Bae, Y.H., Lee, S.W.: Development of a magnetic abrasive jet machining system precision internal precision of circular tubes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 71(3), 384–393 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jha, S., Jain, V.K.: Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44(10), 1019–1029 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Das, M., Jain, V.K., Ghoshdastidar, P.S.: Nanofinishing of flat workpiece using rotational magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (R-MRAFF) process. Int. J. Abras. Manuf. Technol. 62(1–4), 405–420 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paswan, S.K., Bedi, T.S., Singh, A.K.: Modelling of simulation of surface roughness in magnetorheological fluid based honing process. Wear 376, 1207–1221 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grover, V., Singh, A.K.: Improved magnetorheological honing process for nanofinishing of various cylindrical internal surface. Mater. Manuf. Process. 33(11), 1177–1187 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThapar Institute of Engineering and TechnologyPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations