Advertisement

Marx and the Enigma of Commodity

  • Pranab Kanti BasuEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

We take off from Althusser’s contrast between the idealist/mechanical materialist method of abstraction, which, Althusser argues are different forms of essentialism and Marx’s materialism grounded in overdetermination–contradiction. Our central proposition is that the mode of analysis of commodity employed by Hegel and the neoclassical is based on essentialist modes of reasoning while that used by Marx is based on overdetermination–contradiction. The paper tries to establish this through the elaboration of Marx’s critique of commodity fetishism. The relation between Marx’s idea of fetishism, in general, and commodity fetishism is explored through the twin concepts of alienation and reification, which are argued to be the two pillars of fetishism. The critical role of interpellation is brought to the fore in the course of this exploration. The article then moves on to examine how the analyses of commodities in Hegel and in neoclassical economics are both governed by the figure of commodity fetishism.

Keywords

Fetishism Alienation Reification Commodity Interpellation 

References

  1. Althusser, L. 1969. Contradiction and Overdetermination. In For Marx, (tr. Brewster). London: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amariglio, J., and A. Callari. 1989. Marxian Value Theory and the Problem of the Subject: The Role of Commodity Fetishism. Rethinking Marxism 2(3): 31–60.Google Scholar
  3. Basu, P. K. 2012. Rethinking the values of the left. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society 24(2): 221–239.Google Scholar
  4. Basu, P.K. 2018. Financialisation and Financial Crisis: Looking through the lens of Commodity Fetishism. In: International Critical Thought, Routledge, November 2018.Google Scholar
  5. Gibson-Graham. 2000. Introduction. In: Class and its Other, ed. Gibson-Graham, et al. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hegel, G.F.W. 2001. Philosophy of Right, trans. Dyde. Kitchener, Canada: Batoche Books Limited.Google Scholar
  7. Hilferding, R. Finance Capital. A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development, ed. Tom Bottomore (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1981) downloaded from https://www.marxists.org/archive/hilferding/1910/finkap/.
  8. Marx, K. 1875. The Critique of the Gotha Program. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1870/gotha/index.htm.
  9. Marx, K., and F. Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Copyleft: Marxists Internet Archive (marxists.org).Google Scholar
  10. Rubin, I.I. 2008. Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value, trans. M. Samardzija, and F. Perlman. Delhi: Aakar Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Visva-Bharati UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations