Advertisement

Establishing EDM as a Method for Inducing Hydrophobicity on SS 304 Surfaces

  • S. Jithin
  • Upendra V. Bhandarkar
  • Suhas S. JoshiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

Different methods have been adopted by researchers to induce hydrophobicity on metallic surfaces which are inherently hydrophilic in nature. In this work, the authors are analysing the effect of different operating parameters, such as pulse on-time, discharge current and gap voltage, on the measured contact angle (MCA) obtained on stainless steel 304 after processing with EDM. It is also attempted to correlate different surface roughness parameters measured on the surfaces with MCA values. MCA values were obtained in the range 101.9° to 127.45° which shows the hydrophobic nature of SS 304 after EDM. MCA showed to increase with an increase in both pulse on-time and discharge current. MCA showed a maximum value at a gap voltage value of 50 V. Surface parameters such as \(S_{sk}\), \(S_{mr1}\), \(S_{mr2}\), \(V_{vc} /V_{mc}\) and \(S_{al}\) showed good positive linear correlation with MCA. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first one introducing EDM as a method for wetting property change in metals.

Keywords

EDM EDT Contact angle Hydrophobic Surface roughness SS 304 

References

  1. 1.
    Patel, D.S., Singh, A., Balani, K., Ramkumar, J.: Topographical effects of laser surface texturing on various time-dependent wetting regimes in Ti6Al4V. Surf. Coat. Technol. 349, 816–829 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singh, A., Patel, D.S., Ramkumar, J., Balani, K.: Single step laser surface texturing for enhancing contact angle and tribological properties. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 100, 1253 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun, J., Zhang, F., Song, J., Wang, L., Qu, Q., Lu, Y., Parkin, I.: Electrochemical fabrication of superhydrophobic Zn surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 315, 346–352 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song, J., Xu, W., Lu, Y., Fan, X.: Rapid fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces on copper substrates by electrochemical machining. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 10910–10916 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Panjwani, B., Satyanarayana, N., Sinha, S.K.: Tribological characterization of a biocompatible thin film of UHMWPE on Ti6Al4V and the effects of PFPE as top lubricating layer. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 4, 953–960 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kyzioł, K., Kaczmarek, Ł., Brzezinka, G., Kyzioł, A.: Structure, characterization and cytotoxicity study on plasma surface modified Ti-6Al-4V and γ-TiAl alloys. Chem. Eng. J. 240, 516–526 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prajitno, D.H., Maulana, A., Syarif, D.G.: Effect of surface roughness on contact angle measurement of nanofluid on surface of stainless steel 304 by sessile drop method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 739, 012029 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurtuldu, F., Altuncu, E.: Surface wettability properties of 304 stainless steel treated by atmospheric-pressure plasma system. In: 4th International Symposium on Innovative Technologies in Engineering and Science, pp. 1350–1357 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yuan, Y., Lee, T.R.: Surface science techniques. In: Contact Angle and Wetting Properties. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beins, B.C., McCarthy, M.A.: Research Methods and Statistics. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations