Effect of Machining Parameters on Surface Integrity in End Milling of Inconel 625

  • Ramesh RajguruEmail author
  • Hari Vasudevan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)


This study exclusively deals with surface integrity aspects, such as residual stresses, surface roughness, and micro-hardness, in the end milling of Inconel 625 using TiAlSiN-coated carbide-cutting tools distinctively developed for dry machining of the nickel-based superalloy. The aim of this research was to build up a set of guiding principles, which would help out the selection of the proper cutting conditions and tool geometry to enhance surface integrity of nickel-based superalloy Inconel 625. As part of the study, the effect of cutting speed, feed per tooth, radial depth of cut and radial rake angle on surface roughness, residual stresses and micro-hardness was studied. It was observed from results of analysis of variance that the surface roughness is significantly influenced by feed per tooth, followed by cutting speed, while radial depths of cut and radial rake angle have a small influence. The experimental results revealed that the minimum surface roughness (0.084 µm), residual stress (123.2 Mpa) and maximum micro-hardness (344) were observed at higher cutting speed (90 m/min), positive radial rake angle (13°), lower feed per tooth (0.05 mm/tooth), and lower radial depth of cut (0.2 mm). Based on the experimental analysis, it was observed that the higher cutting speed, the lowest feed per tooth, and lower radial depth of cut coupled with the use of positive radial rake angle can ensure induction of superior surface integrity in the machined surfaces.


Inconel 625 Difficult to cut material End milling Surface integrity Residual stresses and micro-hardness 



This study would not have been completed without the immense cooperation and help given by National Facility of texture and OIM IIT Bombay, Advance machining centre Walchand College of Engineering Sangli, and Salbro engineers, Andheri, Mumbai, and the authors thank them for their support and gesture.


  1. 1.
    Hanasaki, S., Fajiwara, J., Touse, M.: Tool wear of coated tools when machining and high nickel alloy. Annu. CIRP 39(1), 77–80 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davim, J.P.: Surface Integrity in Machining. Springer-Verlag, London (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ren, X.D., Zhan, Q.B., Yang, H.M., Dai, F.Z., Cui, C.Y., Sun, G.F., Ruan, L.: The effects of residual stress on fatigue behavior and crack propagation from laser shock processing-worked hole. Mater. Des. 44, 149–154 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henriksen, E.K.: Residual stresses in machined surfaces. Trans. ASME 73, 69–74 (1951)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ee, K.C., Dillon, O.W., Jawahir, I.S.: Int. J. Mech. Sci. 47(2005) 1611Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo, Y.B., Li, W., Jawahir, I.S.: Surface integrity characterization and prediction in machining of hardened and difficult-to-machine alloys: a state-of-art research review and analysis. Mach. Sci. Technol. 13, 437–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ulutan, D., Ozel, T.: Int. J. Mech. Tools Manuf. 51(2011), 250Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kundrák, J., Mamalis, A.G., Gyani, K., Bana, V.: Surface layer microhardness changes with highspeed turning of hardened steels. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. 53, 105–112 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thakur, D.G., Ramamoorthy, B., Vijayaraghavan, L.: Effect of cutting parameters on the degree of work hardening and tool life during high-speed machining of Inconel 718. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. 59, 483–489 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krolczyk, G., Nieslony, P., Legutko, S.: Microhardness and Surface Integrity in turning process of duplex stainless steel (DSS) for different cutting conditions. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23, 859–866 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiang, W., More, A.S, Brown, W.D., Malshe, A.P.: A cBN-TiN composite coating for carbide inserts: Coating characterization and its applications for finish hard turning. Surf. Coat. Tech. 201(2006), 2443–2449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dogra, M., Sharma, V.S., Sachdeva, A., Suri, N.M., Dureja, J.S.: Tool wear, chip formation and workpiece surface issues in CBN hard turning: a review. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Man. 11, 341–358 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Groover, M.P.: Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, 4th edn, pp. 585. Wiley, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Production Technology HMT, Ch. 3 Machinability Aspects in Machining, pp. 53–68. Tata McGraw Hill, Bangalore, India (1980)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ezugwu, E.O.: Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 45, 1353–1367 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dry Machining’s Double Benefit, Machinery and Production Engineering, pp. 14–20 (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ezugwu, E.O., Wang, Z.M., Machado, A.R.: The machinability of nickel-based alloys: a review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86, 1–16 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaya, Eren, Akyuz, Birol: Effects of cutting parameters on machinability characteristics of Ni-based super alloys: a review, published by De Gruyter Open. Open Eng. 7, 330–342 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pawade, R.S., Joshi, S.S., Brahmankar, P.K.: Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 48, 15–28 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhopale, Nandkumar N., Joshi, Suhas S., Pawade, Raju S.: Experimental investigation into the effect of ball end milling parameters on surface integrity of Inconel 718. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 24, 986–998 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moufki, A., Le Coz, G., Dudzinski, D.: End milling of Inconel 718 super alloy—an analytical modelingGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singaravel, B., Selvaraj, T.: A review of micro hardness measurement in turning operation, applied mechanics and materials. ISSN: 1662–7482, Vols. 813–814, pp. 274–278. Scholar
  23. 23.
    El-Wardany, T.I., Kishawy, H.A., Elbestawi, M.A.: Surface integrity of die material in high speed hard machining, part 2: microhardness variations and residual stresses. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 122/633 (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ezugwu, E.O., Pashby, I.R.: High speed milling of nickel-based superalloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 33, 429–437 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Phadke, M.S.: Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDwarkadas J. Sanghvi College of EngineeringMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Dwarkadas J. Sanghvi College of EngineeringMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations