Advertisement

Comparative Study on the Performance of Different Drill Bits for Drilling CFRP

  • N. S. SowjanyaEmail author
  • V. G. Ladeesh
  • R. Manu
  • Jose Mathew
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

In this work, experimental study was carried out to compare the machining performances of the three types of drills: (1) solid carbide drill, (2) diamond core drill, and (3) brad point bit for drilling CFRP. Comparative study of the performance of the tools was carried out in terms of delamination at hole entry and exit side. Experiment was conducted based on Taguchi’s orthogonal array technique. From the analysis of results, it is found that the performance of diamond core drill was better and resulted in lesser damages of holes. The lowest value for the delamination factor at entrance (1.093) and exit (1.101) was obtained at a spindle speed of 500 rpm, feed rate of 3 mm/min with the thrust force of 78 N. The use of diamond core drill is recommended for drilling CFRP in terms of economy and drilled hole quality.

Keywords

CFRP Drilling Delamination factor Fiber pull-out Cutting force 

References

  1. 1.
    Melentiev, R., Priarone, P.C., Robiglio, M., Settineri, L.: Effects of tool geometry and process parameters on delamination in CFRP drilling: an overview. In: 3rd CIRP Conference on Surface Integrity (CIRP CSI), pp. 31–34. North Carolina, USA (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Das, G., Das, P.: Cutting forces in drilling operation: measurement and modeling for medium-scale manufacturing firms. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 121(8), 12–17 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.5120/21559-4592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsao, C.C.: Thrust force and delamination of core-saw drill during drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 37, 23–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0963-6 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinho, L.V., Carou, D., Davim, J.P.: Comparative study of the performance of diamond-coated drills on the delamination in drilling of carbon fiber feinforced plastics: assessing the influence of the temperature of the drill. J. Compos. Mater. 50(2), 179–189.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998315571973 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsao, C.C.: Experimental study of drilling composite materials with step-core drill. J. Mater. Des. 29, 1740–1744.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.022 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Priarone, P.C., Robiglio, M., Melentiev, R., Settineri, L.: Diamond drilling of carbon fiber reinforced polymers: influence of tool grit size and process parameters on workpiece delamination. In: 1st CIRP Conference on Composite Materials Parts Manufacturing, pp. 181–186. Karlsuhe, Germany (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konneh, M., Sudin, I., Abdullah Sidek, A.: Surface roughness in drilled carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite using diamond coated ball- nose drills. J. Adv. Mater. Res. 1115, 90–95. www.scientific.net/AMR.1115.90 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robert, V., Henerichs, M., Kuster, F.: Comparison of conventional drilling and orbital drilling in machining carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP). CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 65, 137–140 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robert, V.: Fundamentals of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) machining. Ph.D. thesis, Eth Zurich (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eneyew, E.D., Ramulu, M.: Experimental study of surface quality and damage when drilling unidirectional CFRP composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 3(4), 354–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2014.10.003 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koenig, W., Wulf, C., Grass, P., Willerscheid, H.: Machining of fiber reinforced plastics. Ann. CIRP Manuf. Technol. 34(2), 537–548 (1985).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60186-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krishnamoorthy, A., Rajendra Boopathy, S.: Delamination analysis in drilling of CFRP composites using response surface methodology. J. Compos. Mater. 43, 2885–2902.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998309345309 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babu, J., Sunny, T., Alex Paul, N., Mohan, K.P., Philip, J., Davim, J.P.: Assessment of delamination in composite materials: a review. J. Eng. Manuf. 230(11), 1990–2003.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415619343 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology CalicutCalicutIndia

Personalised recommendations