Advertisement

Cryogenic Machining of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy for Bio-implant Applications

  • Vaibhav Tibrewal
  • Kalpit Dak
  • Aundhe Himanshu
  • Hema Kumar
  • P. Kuppan
  • A. S. S. BalanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

Magnesium and its alloys are slowly entering into the field of bio-implants as a substitute to currently used materials because of their mechanical properties and physiological benefits. However, the magnesium alloys corrode much before than the bone is fully healed because of their high corrosion rate in physiological environment of body. In this experiment, AZ31B magnesium alloy has been subjected to turning operation under dry and cryogenic environment. This research is an attempt to study the effects of cutting speed and feed rate on forces, surface roughness, temperature and microstructure. Furthermore, a comparative study is done on the effects of machining environment on these factors. The results show that a combination of high cutting speed and low feed rate with cryogenic environment gives the best surface finish.

Keywords

Bio-implants Surface roughness Turning Cryogenic environment Chip morphology 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, Q., Shu, D., Hu, C., Zhao, Z., Yuan, B.: Grain refinement in an as-cast AZ61 magnesium alloy processed by multi-axial forging under the multitemperature processing procedure. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 541, 98–104 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poinern, G.E.J., Brundavanam, S., Fawcett, D.: Biomedical magnesium alloys: a review of material properties, surface modifications and potential as a biodegradable orthopaedic implant. Am. J. Biomed. Eng. 2(6), 218–240 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajbe.20120206.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Radha, R., Sreekanth, D.: Insight of magnesium alloys and composites for orthopaedic implant applications—a review. J. Magnes. Alloys 5, 286–312 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2017.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song, G.L.: Corrosion behavior and prevention strategies for magnesium (Mg) alloys. General Motors Corporation, USA.  https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098962.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, E., Yang, L., Xu, J., Chen, H.: Microstructure, mechanical properties and bio-corrosion properties of Mg-Si(-Ca,Zn) alloy for biomedical application. Acta Biomater. 6, 1756–1762 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, Y., Xu, Z., Smith, C., Sankar, J.: Recent advances on the development of magnesium alloys for biodegradable implants. Acta Biomater. 10, 4561–4573 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uddin, M.S., Rosman, H., Hall, C., Murphy, P.: Enhancing the corrosion resistance of biodegradable Mg-based alloy by machining-induced surface integrity: influence of machining parameters on surface roughness and hardness. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90, 2095–2108 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9536-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nasr, M.N.A., Outeiro, J.C.: Sensitivity analysis of cryogenic cooling on machining of magnesium alloy AZ31B-O. Procedia CIRP 31, 264–269 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pu, Z.: Cryogenic machining and burnishing of AZ31B magnesium alloy for enhanced surface integrity and functional performance. Thesis and dissertations—Mechanical engineering. 5 (2012). http://uknowledge.uky.edu/me_etds/5
  10. 10.
    Yildiz, Y., Nalbant, M.: A review of cryogenic cooling in machining processes. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 48, 947–964 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dinesh, S., Senthilkumar, V., Asokan, P., Arulkirubakaran, D.: Effect of cryogenic cooling on machinability and surface quality of bio-degradable ZK60 Mg alloy. Mater. Des. 87, 1030–1036 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pu, Z., Outeiro, J.C., Batista, A.C., Dillon Jr., O.W., Puleo, D.A., Jawahir, I.S.: Surface integrity in dry and cryogenic machining of AZ31B Mg alloy with varying cutting edge radius tools. Procedia Eng. 19, 282–287 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shi, K., Zhang, D., Ren, J., Yao, C., Huang, X.: Effect of cutting parameters on machinability characteristics in milling of magnesium alloy with carbide tool. Adv. Mech. Eng. 8(1), 1–9 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016628392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Magadum, S., Arun Kumar, S., Yoganath, V.G., Srinivasa, C.K., GuruMurthy, T.: Evaluation of tool life and cutting forces in cryogenic machining of hardened steel. Procedia Mater. Sci. 5, 2542–2549 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dilip Jerold, B., Pradeep Kumar, M.: Experimental comparison of carbon-dioxide and liquid nitrogen cryogenic coolants in turning of AISI 1045 steel. Cryogenics 52, 569–574 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2012.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malleswara Rao, J.N., Sumalatha, M., Kesava Rao, V.V.S., Anurupa, V., Srivalli, G.: Variation of surface roughness with feed rate on mild steel components produced by CNC lathe. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 3(06) (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Danish, M., Ginta, T. L., Habib, K., Carou, D., Rani, A. M. A., Saha, B. B.: Thermal analysis during turning of AZ31 magnesium alloy under dry and cryogenic conditions. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 91, 2855–2868 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9893-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pu, Z., Song, G.-L., Yang, S., Outeiro, J.C., Dillon Jr., O.W., Puleo, D.A., Jawahir, I.S.: Grain refined and basal textured surface produced by burnishing for improved corrosion performance of AZ31B Mg alloy. Corros. Sci. 57, 192–201 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Al-Dolaimy, K.A.: Effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness in turning operations. Al-Qadisiyah J. Eng. Sci. 9(4) (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paul, S., Dhar, N.R., Chattopadhyay, A.B.: Beneficial effects of cryogenic cooling over dry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning AISI 1060 steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 116, 44–48 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00839-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Viswanathan, R., Ramesh, S., Subburam, V.: Measurement and optimization of performance characteristics in turning of Mg alloy under dry and MQL conditions. Measurement (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pu, Z., Dillon Jr., O.W., Jawahir, I.S., Puleo, D.A.: Microstructural changes of AZ31 magnesium alloys induced by cryogenic machining and its influence on corrosion resistance in simulated body fluid for biomedical applications. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference MSEC2010, October 12–15, 2010, Erie, Pennsylvania, USA.  https://doi.org/10.1115/msec2010-34234
  23. 23.
    Rotella, G., Umbrello, D.: Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in dry and cryogenic cutting of Ti6Al4V alloy. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Swaminathan, S., Shankar, M.R., Lee, S., Hwang, J., King, A.H., Kezar, R.F., Rao, B.C., Brown, T.L., Chandrasekar, S., Compton, W.D., Trumble, K.P.: Large strain deformation and ultra-fine grained materials by machining. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 410411, 358–363 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aramcharoen, A.: Influence of cryogenic cooling on tool wear and chip formation in turning of titanium alloy. Preocedia CIRP 46, 83–86 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bermingham, M.J., Palanisamy, S., Kent, D., Dargusch, M.S.: A comparison of cryogenic and high pressure emulsion cooling technologies on tool life and chip morphology in Ti-6Al-4V cutting. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212, 752–765 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vaibhav Tibrewal
    • 1
  • Kalpit Dak
    • 1
  • Aundhe Himanshu
    • 1
  • Hema Kumar
    • 1
  • P. Kuppan
    • 1
  • A. S. S. Balan
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringVellore Institute of TechnologyVelloreIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Innovative Manufacturing ResearchVellore Institute of TechnologyVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations