Advertisement

Toward Modeling a Global Social Contract

  • Takashi Inoguchi
  • Lien Thi Quynh Le
Chapter
Part of the Trust book series (TRUST, volume 3)

Abstract

The task of linking global citizens’ preferences in value orientation and sovereign states’ preferences in treaty orientation is carried out in this chapter. The key two dimensions (protective vs emancipative and secular vs sacred) of the World Value Survey data and the key three dimensions (agile vs cautious, global commons vs individual citizens’ interests, and aspirational bonding vs mutual binding) of the Multilateral Treaties Survey data are correlated to show that their links are fairly robust, indicating that our initial hunch-cum-hypothesis is basically correct.

References

  1. Basanez, M. (2015). A world of three cultures: How values impact development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, M. (1981/2009). Nuclear power and non-proliferation: The remaking of US policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Inoguchi, T. (2008). Political theory. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science (Vol. 6, pp. 2050–2063). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  5. Inoguchi, T. (2015). War occurrence: Hyper-insecurity and multilateral institutions. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 388–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Inoguchi, T. (2018). Theoretical underpinnings of global social contract. In W. Thompson (Ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of empirical international relations theory (Vol. 4, pp. 209–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Inoguchi, T., & Le, L. T. Q. (2016). Toward modelling a global social contract: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 17(3), 489–522.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, K. (2015). Reconstructing the World Trade Organization for the 21st century: An institutional approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Joyner, D. H. (2013). Interpreting the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Krasner, S. (Ed.). (1983). International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kutney, G. (2013). Carbon politics and the failure of the Kyoto protocol. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Le, T. Q. L., Mikami, Y., & Inoguchi, T. (2014). Global leadership and international regime: Empirical testing of cooperation without hegemony paradigm on the basis of 120 multilateral conventions data deposited to the United Nations system. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 15(4), 523–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Popovski, V., & Fraser, T. (2014). The security council as global legislator (global institutions). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Solingen, E. (2013). Regional orders at century’s dawn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2014). Global energy justice: Problems, principles, and practices. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Volgy, T. (1973). The role of the ‘outsider’ in quasi-legislative systems: The potential utility of a legislative model. International Organization, 27(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Woodside, A. (2006). Lost modernities: China, Vietnam, Korea and the hazards of world history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yamamoto, Y. (2008). Kokusai regime to governance (International regimes and governance). Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
  20. Young, M. (2011). The rise of the meritocracy. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Inoguchi
    • 1
  • Lien Thi Quynh Le
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Asian CulturesJ.F. Oberlin UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.College of EconomicsHue UniversityHueVietnam

Personalised recommendations