Advertisement

Knowledge Transfer and Creation Systems: Perspectives on Corporate Socialization Mechanisms and Human Resource Management

  • Tamiko KasaharaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This study explores the role played by corporate socialization mechanisms (CSMs) and human resource management (HRM) practices in inter- and intra-unit knowledge flows and creation systems in multinational corporations (MNCs), especially focusing on professional service firms (PSFs). Drawing on a longitudinal case study of Cambridge Technology Partners (CTP), which was established during a paradigm shift in the consulting industry arising from the advancement of information technology (IT), the findings of this study suggest that CSMs are incorporated into HRM practices. When CTP was a global consulting company, CSMs worked as an infrastructure for transferring knowledge from the headquarters (HQs) to a focal subsidiary. HRM practices were designed to enhance and practice the HQs’ goals of achieving global competitiveness. Specifically, training and development practices played a role in transferring knowledge from the HQs to a focal subsidiary at the corporate level, while tacit and explicit knowledge were transferred from senior to junior consultants at the individual level. At present, sharing the corporate philosophy within CTP has generated a high project success rate in Japan and laid the foundation for further knowledge creation for CTP. HRM practices are designed to enhance CTP’s business model, methodology, and corporate culture and to create new knowledge. Training and development practices enhance the creation of new knowledge within the company. Additionally, performance appraisals and incentive practices are designed to encourage consultants to create new knowledge.

Keywords

Corporate socialization mechanism Human resource management Knowledge transfer Knowledge creation system Cambridge Technology Partners 

References

  1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ambile, T. M., Baker, G. P., & Beer, M. (1995) Cambridge technology partners (A), HBS case 9-496-005 (Rev. April 11, 1996). Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  4. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  6. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and character change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Björkman, I., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Li, L. (2004). Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: The impact of headquarters control mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boxall, P. (1996). The strategic HRM debate and the resource-based view of the firm. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(3), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination; The role of human resource practices in the performance of high technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1988). Creation, adoption, and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management, 15(4), 603–625.Google Scholar
  17. Gompers, P., & Catherine, C. (1997a). Cambridge technology partners: 1991 start up. HBS case9-298-044 (Rev. November 23, 1998). Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  18. Gompers, P., & Catherine, C. (1997b). Cambridge technology partners: Corporate venturing. HBS case9-297-033 (Rev. January 8, 1999). Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Issue S2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta, A. K., & Singhal, A. (1993). Managing human resources for innovation and creativity. Research Technology Management, 36(3), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for making knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 106–116.Google Scholar
  23. Hatch, N. W., & Dyer, J. H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1155–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hedlund, G. (1986). The hypermodern MNC: A heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1), 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang, S.-C., Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 236–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaše, R., Paauwe, J., & Zupan, N. (2009). HR practices, interpersonal relations, and intrafirm knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: A social network perspective. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 615–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kostova, T., & Ross, K. (2003). Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kubr, M. (2002). Management consulting: A guide to the profession (4th ed.). Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  29. Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 699–727.Google Scholar
  30. Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (2003). HR’s role in building relationship networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 53–63.Google Scholar
  31. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the human resource architecture: The relationship among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of Management, 28(4), 517–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lødendahl, B. R. (2005). Strategic management of professional service firms (3rd ed.). Copenhagen, DK: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  34. Maister, D. H. (2003). Managing the professional service firm. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mäkelä, K., & Brewster, C. (2009). Interunit interaction contexts, interpersonal social capital, and the differing levels of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, J. (1991). Rapid application development. New York: Mcmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C., & Park, H. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 586–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Minvaeba, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2014). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Minvaeba, D. B. (2005). HRM practices and MNC knowledge transfer. Personnel Review, 34(1), 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nishii, S. (2013). Chishiki shuuyaku gata kigyo no global senryaku to business model (Global strategy and business model in KIFs: The generation, development, and evolution in the management consulting firms). Doyukan Publishing Company (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  42. Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. (1994). Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Peltokorpi, V., & Vaara, E. (2014). Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: Productive and counterproductive effects of language-sensitive recruitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 600–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Reed, K. K., Lubatkin, M., & Srinivasa, N. (2006). Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 867–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.Google Scholar
  50. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.Google Scholar
  53. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(Issue 4), 464–476.Google Scholar
  54. Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  56. Yamao, S., De Cieri, H., & Hutchings, K. (2009). Transferring subsidiary knowledge to global headquarters: Subsidiary senior executives’ perceptions of the role of HR configurations in the development of knowledge stocks. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Youndt, M. A., Subrammaniam, M., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 335–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  59. Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information and ManagementUniversity of ShizuokaShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations