Advertisement

The Philosophy of Paradigm Change in the History of Social Evolution

  • John CantwellEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

A technological paradigm identifies the coherent features consistently present in the evolution of an innovation system over time. These shared characteristics refer to a widespread cluster of innovations during a given era that rely on a common set of scientific principles and on similar organizational methods. The idea of an overarching paradigm that depicts commonalities in innovation efforts may be applied at the level of an industry, a technical field, or in society as a whole, as in the case of a techno-socio-economic paradigm. Occasional paradigm shifts entail some change in the framework for innovation, while preserving certain features of the old ways in a new synthesis. Thus, paradigm shift takes the form of an Hegelian evolutionary or dialectical process. The evolution of an innovation system as a whole derives from the interaction or co-evolution of its central elements: knowledge, institutions, and technology in production. While conventional science isolates causal associations between specific parts of a system, Hegelian conceptual reasoning addresses the combined and interconnected movement of a complex relational system with multiple interdependencies. In the light of this contention, I argue that we should move away from age-old debates over whether social evolution or development is driven primarily by knowledge, by institutions or by the forces of production. Our attention should now turn instead to how these parts move together in an evolving system, and how their mutual goodness of fit adjusts during phases of paradigm shift and realignment.

Keywords

Technological paradigm Techno-socio-economic paradigm Paradigm shift Hegelian approach Social evolution Technological evolution 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power prosperity and poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99(1), 106–131.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy, 36(2), 274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies: Engines of growth? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantwell, J. A. (1989). Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, G. A. (1978). Karl Marx’s theory of history: A defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Constant, E. (1980). The origins of the turbojet revolution. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dosi, G. (1984). Technical change and industrial transformation. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2010). Technological change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2013). The evolution of technologies: An assessment of the state-of-the-art. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 3–46.Google Scholar
  13. Edris, S. (2019). Paradigm change in the history of the pharmaceutical industry. In J. A. Cantwell & T. Hayashi (Eds.), Paradigm shift in technologies and innovation systems. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, C., & Louça, F. (2001). As time goes by: From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. L. G. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  18. Granstrand, O. (2018). Evolving properties of intellectual capitalism: Patents and innovations for growth and welfare. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodgson, G. M. (1999). Economics and utopia: Why the learning economy is not the end of history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Kline, G. L. (1988). The myth of Marx’ materialism. In H. Dahm, T. J. Blakeley, & G. L. Kline (Eds.), Philosophical sovietology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  23. Lipsey, R. G., Carlaw, K. I., & Bekar, C. T. (2006). Economic transformations: General purpose technologies and long-term economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Malerba, F. (Ed.). (2004). Sectoral system of innovation: Concepts, issues, and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McCloskey, D. N. (2016). Bourgeois equality: How ideas, not capital or institutions. Enriched the World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Nelson, R. R. (1989). What is private and what is public about technology? Science, Technology and Human Values, 14(3), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nelson, R. R. (2018). Economics from an evolutionary perspective. In R. R. Nelson, G. Dosi, C. E. Helfat, A. Pyka, P. P. Saviotti, K. Lee, K. Dopfer, F. Malerba, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), Modern evolutionary economics: An overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6(1), 36–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pavitt, K. L. R. (1987). The objectives of technology policy. Science and Public Policy, 14(4), 182–188.Google Scholar
  33. Perez, C. (1983). Structural change and the assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. Futures, 15(5), 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perez, C. (2009). The double bubble at the turn of the century: Technological roots and structural implications. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4), 779–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pinkard, T. (1994). Hegel’s phenomenology: The sociality of reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinkard, T. (2017). Does history make sense: Hegel on the historical shapes of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pippin, R. B. (2008). Hegel’s practical philosophy: Rational agency as ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. von Tunzelmann, G. N. (1995). Technology and industrial progress: The foundations of economic growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  42. von Tunzelmann, G. N. (2003). Historical coevolution of governance and technology in the industrial revolutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(4), 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Westphal, K. R. (2003). Hegel’s epistemology: A philosophical introduction to the phenomenology of spirit. Indiannapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  44. Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations