Advertisement

Sounding Between Bodies

  • Mickey Vallee
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Sound book series (PASTS)

Abstract

This chapter explores an ecology of voice relations—it also proceeds by way of a metamorphosis. Instead of concentrating on a case study, it places a variation of vocal utterances and bodies in science, art, and nature alongside one another in an attempt to capture the spirit of a metamorphosis. This is done in order to capture and to capitulate what Deleuze and Guattari in A Thousand Plateaus describe as the becoming-animal in voice. The intention is to expand the infrastructure of audibility so we can hear how it touches simultaneously on multiple scales of sounding in science, art, and philosophy; it simultaneously produces the voice as an imaginary organ of openness and connection, a touching between multiple surfaces, utterances, and iterations, from screams to grunts to rasps to howls. It introduces the concept of a voicescape to capture how voices are relational and ethical, and produce more-than-human communities between animals, humans, and technologies.

References

  1. Andersen, J. (2015). Now you’ve got the shiveries: Affect, intimacy, and the ASMR whisper community. Television & New Media, 16(8), 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, M. H. (1998). On moral considerability: An essay on who morally matters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bolhuis, J. J., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2009). Can evolution explain how minds work? Nature, 458, 832–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cage, J. (2016). To Mario Cavista. In L. Kuhn (Ed.), The selected letters of John Cage (p. 477). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clough, P. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clough, P. (2010). Afterword: The future of affect studies. Body & Society, 16(1), 222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crespi, P. (2014). Rhythmanalysis in gymnastics and dance: Rudolf Bode and Rudolf Laban. Body & Society, 20(3&4), 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eidsheim, N. S. (2015). Sensing sound: Singing and listening as vibrational practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitch, W. T. (2000). The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(7), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gagliano, M., Mancuso, S., & Robert, D. (2012). Towards understanding plant bioacoustics. Trends in Plant Science, 17(6), 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher, M. (2015). Field recording and the sounding of spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(3), 560–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glass, K. (2017). Politics and affect in black women’s fiction. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. Haggard, P. (2008). Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 934–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen, M. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of twenty-first media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Henriques, J. (2010). The vibrations of affect and their propagation on a night out on Kingston’s dancehall scene. Body & Society, 16(1), 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herbst, C. T., Stoeger, A. S., Frey, R., Lohscheller, J., Titze, I. R., Gumpenberger, M., & Fitch, W. T. (2012). How low can you go? Physical production mechanism of elephant infrasonic vocalizations. Science, 337(6094), 595–599.Google Scholar
  19. Hossain, M. S., Muhammad, G., & Alamri, A. (2017). Smart healthcare monitoring: A voice pathology detection paradigm for smart cities. Multimedia Systems. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-017-0561-x.
  20. Ikoniadou, E. (2014). Abstract time and affective perception in the sonic work of art. Body & Society, 20(3&4), 140–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2011). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahn, D. (1999). Noise, water, meat: A history of sound in the arts. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kircher, A. (1650/1970). Musurgia universalis. Hildesheim and New York: G. Olms (Reprint of the Rome, 1650 edition).Google Scholar
  24. La Barbara, J. (2002). Voice is the original instrument. Contemporary Music Review, 21(1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. LaBelle, B. (2014). Lexicon of the mouth: Poetics and politics of voice and the oral imaginary. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  26. Lameira, A. R., Hardus, M. E., Mielke, A., Wich, S. A., & Shumaker, R. W. (2016). Vocal fold control beyond the species-specific repertoire in an orangutan. Scientific Reports, 6. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30315.
  27. Ling, C., Li, Q., Brown, M. E., Kishimoto, Y., Toya, Y., Devine, E. E., & Welman, N. V. (2015). Bioengineered vocal fold mucosa for voice restoration. Science Translational Medicine, 7(314). Retrieved from https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/7/314/314ra187.
  28. Malloch, S. E., & Trevarthen, C. E. (Eds.). (2009). Communicative musicality: Exploring the basis of human companionship. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Malone, N., Wade, A. H., Fuentes, A., Riley, E. P., Remis, M., & Robinson, C. J. (2014). Ethnoprimatology: Critical interdisciplinarity and multispecies approaches in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 34(1), 8–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manning, E. (2014). Wondering the world directly—Or, how movement outruns the subject. Body & Society, 20(3–4), 162–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLean, E. (2016). Exploring parents’ experiences and perceptions of singing and using their voice with their baby in a neonatal unit: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Article in Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 11, 1–42.Google Scholar
  33. Meloni, M. (2014). How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review, 62, 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible: Followed by working notes. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Oliveros, P. (2011). Auralizing in the sonosphere: A vocabulary for inner sound and sounding. Journal of Visual Culture, 10(2), 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pedwell, C. (2014). Affective relations: The transnational politics of empathy. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Portfors, C. V. (2007). Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 46(1), 28–34.Google Scholar
  38. Rancière, J. (2004). Introducing disagreement. Angelaki, 9(3), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sha, X. W. (2013). Poiesis and enchantment in topological matter. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shadlen, M. N., & Gold, J. L. (2004). The neurophysiology of decision making as a window on cognition. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences III (pp. 1229–1243). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Shepherd, J. (1991). Music as social text. London, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  42. Shepherd, J. (2015). Music, the body, and signifying practices. In K. Devine & J. Shepherd (Eds.), The Routledge reader on the sociology of music (pp. 87–96). London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spencer, H. (1891). The origin and function of music. In Essays: Scientific, political, and speculative, 2. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  44. Thomaidis, K., & Macpherson, B. (Eds.). (2015). Voice studies: Critical approaches to process, performance and experience. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Towsey, M., Wimmer, J., Williamson, I., & Roe, P. (2014). The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecological Informatics, 21, 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Upton, B. (2015). The aesthetic of play. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mickey Vallee
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Interdisciplinary StudiesAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada

Personalised recommendations