Advertisement

Double-Shouldered Barkcloth Beaters and Prehistoric Seafaring in South China and Southeast Asia

  • Maya Hayashi TangEmail author
  • Kim Dung Nguyen
  • Mana Hayashi Tang
  • Chung Tang
Chapter
Part of the The Archaeology of Asia-Pacific Navigation book series (AAPN, volume 1)

Abstract

Barkcloth, also known as tapa, is a non-woven fabric that took on great importance in cultures of the Pacific Islands. Archaeological evidence traces the origins of barkcloth culture to East Asia. Stone beaters are the major tools associated with barkcloth production. The double-shouldered barkcloth beater (Hainan-type beater) is the only club beater found on both the East Asian mainland, as well as in Hainan Island, Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia. It is an important archaeological indicator of Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age seafaring between South China and the neighboring regions. Double-shouldered stone beaters first appeared in mainland South China during the Late Neolithic. They began to spread across the ocean by 4,000 BP and by 3,500 BP they existed on both the mainland and in Island Southeast Asia. Thus evidence suggests that ancient seafarers carried their barkcloth culture across the ocean as early as the Late Neolithic. The distribution of double-shouldered stone beaters allows the identification of three oceanic interaction spheres. One reached from the Vietnam coast of the Gulf of Tonkin to Hainan and the Leizhou Peninsula. The second interaction sphere extended across the South China Sea, from Hainan and the mainland to northern Luzon in the Philippines. This likely marks the beginning of systematic seafaring across distances of over one thousand kilometers. The third interaction sphere, occurred in the islands of western Pacific, may have reached northward from Luzon to the northeast coast of Taiwan and possibly the Ryukyu Islands. The abundant archaeological data on barkcloth stone tools have created a new foundation for the studies of prehistoric maritime link of the region.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council’s General Research Fund Project Nos. CUHK431000 and 450413. The authors thank Professor Tang Lingling, Professor Zhou Weimin, Deputy Director Iksam Djahidin Djorimi, Research Fellow Kuo Su-chiu, and the Vietnam Institute of Archaeology, Hainan Museum, and Hainan Baisha Museum for providing important archaeological data regarding barkcloth beaters in these regions. We would also like to thank Professor Wu Chunming for the opportunity to publish here and for his kind patience during this entire process.

References

  1. Anderson, A. (2005). Crossing the Luzon Strait: Archaeological chronology in the Batanes Islands, Philippines and the regional sequence of Neolithic dispersal. Journal of Austronesian Studies, 1(2), 27–48.Google Scholar
  2. Bellwood, P. (1979). Neolithic and early metal age cultures on the Southeast Asian Mainland. Man’s conquest of the pacific: The prehistory of Southeast Asia and Oceania (pp. 153–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bellwood, P. (1991). The Austronesian dispersal and the origin of languages. Scientific American, 265, 88–93.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0791-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellwood, P. (1995). Austronesian prehistory in Southeast Asia: Homeland, expansion and transformation. In P. Bellwood, J. J. Fox, & D. Tryon (Eds.), The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 103–118). Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bellwood, P. (1997). Ancient Seafarers: New evidence of early Southeast Asian Sea Voyages. Archaeology, 50(2), 20–22.Google Scholar
  6. Bellwood, P., Fox, J. J., & Tryon, D. (1995). The austronesians in history: Common origins and diverse transformations. In P. Bellwood, J. J. Fox, & D. Tryon (Eds.), The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 1–16). Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beyer, H. O. (1948). Philippine and East Asian archaeology, and its relation to the origin of the Pacific islands population. National Research Council Bulletin, 29. Quezon City: National Research Council of the Philippines.Google Scholar
  8. Blust, R. (1985). The Austronesian Homeland: A linguistic perspective. Asian Perspective, 26(1), 45–67.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, C. S., Liu, H. L., Moncada, X., Seelenfreund, A., Seelenfreund, D., & Chung, K. F. (2015). A holistic picture of Austronesian migrations revealed by phylogeography of Pacific paper mulberry. In P. V. Kirch (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(44), 13537–13542. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503205112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, C. S. (2011). Austronesian and tapa culture. In Chang, C. S. (Ed.), Felting bark to make cloth: Catalogue of the tapa collections of the national Museum of Prehistory, Taiwan (pp. 9-15). Taitung: Taiwan National Museum of Prehistory (南島語族與樹皮布文化, 《打樹成衣: 南島語族的樹皮布及其文化》,臺東:國立臺灣史前文化博物館,2011年).Google Scholar
  11. Colani, M. (1933). Céramique, procédésanciens de décoration. Bulletin de l’Ecolefrançaised’Extrême-Orient, 33, 349–355.Google Scholar
  12. Deng, X. (1994). The Ancient Austronesian languages in the Dialect of Southern Chinese. Minority Languages of China, 3, 36–40 (Nanfang Hanyuzhong de Gu Nandaoyu Chengfen, 南方漢語中的古南島語成分,《民族語文》,第三期,1994年, 頁36-40).Google Scholar
  13. Ewins, R. (1982). Fijian Artefacts. Hobart: Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Collection.Google Scholar
  14. Glover, I., & Bellwood, P. (Eds.). (2004). Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to history. Oxford: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, M. C. (Ed.). (2006). Bark-Cloth in Southeast Asia. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  16. Hung, H. C., Yang S. L., Nguyen K. D., Iizuka Y., & Bellwood P. (2012). Jade objects of Taiwan in Oversea and Cultural Elements of Beinan. Field Archaeology of Taiwan, 15(1), 19–40 (Haiwaichutu de Taiwan yujiqi beinanwenhuayaosu海外出土的台灣玉及其卑南文化要素,《田野考古》,第十五卷第一期,2012年,頁19-40).Google Scholar
  17. Jiang, Y., & Peng, S. (1992). Guinan large stone spade. Cultural Relics in Southern China, 1, 19–24 (Guinan DashichanYanjiu桂南大石鏟研究,《南方文物》,第一期,1992年,頁19-24).Google Scholar
  18. Jiao, T. L. (2010). Prehistoric China and Polynesia: An Austronesian link. In Zhiyue Wu (Ed.), Splendor of Hawaii and Polynesia (pp. 3–18). Fuzhou: Fujian Education Press (史前中國與波利尼西亞:南島語族的聯繫, 《尋找夏威夷》,福州:福建教育出版社,2010年).Google Scholar
  19. Kirch, P. V. (2002). On the road of the winds: An Archaeological history of the Pacific Islands before European contact. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kooijman, S. (1972). Tapa in Polynesia. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 234. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, D. (1988). Science and Civilization in China. Volume 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology; part 9, Textile Technology: Spinning and Reeling. In J. Needham (Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kuo, S. (2015). A Discussion on the contents of the Shuntanpu culture in Northern Taiwan. In L. Yichang (Ed.), Monograph on Taiwan’s Prehistory (pp. 185–246). Taipei: Academia Sinica, Linking Publishing (Taiwan Beibu Xuntangpu Wenhua de Neihan Tantao臺灣北部訊塘埔文化的內涵探討, Taiwan Shiqianshi Zhuanlun《台灣史前史專論》,台北:中央研究院、聯經出版公司,2015年).Google Scholar
  23. Li, Z. (2011). Shell Mound, Large Stone Spade, and Burial Cave: The evolution of prehistoric cultures in the Nanning Region. Journal of National Museum of China, 7, 58–68 (貝丘、大石鏟、岩洞葬——南寧及其附近地區史前文化的發展與演變,《中國國家博物館館刊》,2011年).Google Scholar
  24. Lien, C. M. (1979). Grooved beaters of Taiwan. The Continent Magazine, 58(4) (pp. 164–178). (Taiwan de youcaoshibang台灣的有槽石棒,《大陸雜誌》,臺北市:大陸雜誌社,1979年).Google Scholar
  25. Liu, I. C., Chung, I. H., & Yan, Y. C. (2008). Rescue excavation and data analyses of Xuntangpu site due to the construction of Xindian line of the Taipei Metro. Taipei: NEWASIA Ltd (Dongxixiang Kuaisu Gonglu Bali Xindianxian Bali Wuguduan Gongcheng Yingxiang Xuntangpu Yizhi Jinji Kaogu Fajue yu Ziliao Zhengli Fenxi Jihua《東西向快速公路八里新店線八里五股段工程影響訊塘埔遺址緊急考古發掘與資料整理分析計畫》新亞建設開發股份有限公司).Google Scholar
  26. Liu, I. C., Chiu, S. C., Tai, J. C., Wang, M. Y., & Li, Y. Y. (2001). Report on rescue excavation of the Dazhuwei site in Yilan County due to construction of the Chiang Wei-shui Memorial Freeway. Yilan: Yilan County Government (Yilanyxian Dazhuwei Yizhi Shou Beiyi Gaosu Gonglu Toucheng Jiaoliudao Zadao Yingxiang Bufen Fajue Yanjiu Baogao《宜蘭縣大竹圍遺址受北宜高速公路頭城交流道匝道影響部分發掘研究報告》,宜蘭:宜蘭縣政府,2001年).Google Scholar
  27. Lynch, F. X., & Ewing, J. F. (1968). Twelve Ground-stone Implements from Mindanao, Philippine Island. In W. G. So lheim II (Ed.), Anthropology at the Eighth Pacific Science Congress of the Pacific Science Association and the Fourth Far Eastern Prehistory Congress (pp. 7–17). Honolulu: Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  28. Neich, R., & Pendergrast, M. (1997). Traditional tapa textiles of the Pacific. New York: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  29. Nguyễn, C. (2002). The Mai Pha culture. Lang Son: Lang Son Bureau of Culture and Communication (VănHóa Mai Pha. LạngSơn: Sở VănHóaThông Tin LạngSơnXuấtBản).Google Scholar
  30. Nguyễn, K. S., Pham, M. H., & Tong, T. T. (Eds.). (2004). Northern Vietnam from the Neolithic to the Han Period. In I. Glover & P. Bellwood (Eds.), Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to history (pp. 177–209). Oxford: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
  31. Roth, I., & Lindorf, H. (2002). South American medicinal plants: botany, remedial properties and general use. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaw, P. T., & Chao, S. Y. (1994). Surface circulation in the South China Sea. Deep-Sea Research I, 41(11/12), (pp. 1663–1683). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Soares P. A., Trejaut, J. A., Rito, T., Cavadas, B., Hill, C., & Eng, K. K., et al. (2016). Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations. Human Genetics, 135(3), 309–326. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-015-1620-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tang, C. (2002). Questions regarding Hainan barkcloth. In W. Zhou (Ed.), Conference Proceedings of the International Conference on the History of Hainan and Guangdong Provinces (pp. 288–303). Haikou: Hainan Publishing House (Hainandaoshupibu de jigewenti海南島樹皮布的幾個問題, Qiongyue Difang Wenxian Guoji Xueshu Yantaohui Lunwenji,《瓊粵地方文獻國際學術研討會論文集》,海口:海南出版社,2002年).Google Scholar
  35. Tang, C. (2003). Deciphering the Functionality of Prehistoric Stone Beaters Using Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives. Studies on Southeast China Archaeology, 3, 133–154. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press (Cong erchongzhengjufalunshiqianshipai de gongneng從二重證據法論史前石拍的功能,《東南考古研究》,第三輯,廈門:廈門大學出版社,2003年).Google Scholar
  36. Tang, C. (2012). Origins of clothes: Barkcloth exhibition catalogue. Hong Kong: Centre for Chinese Archaeology and Art, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  37. Tang, C. (2013). Technological structures of barkcloth stone beaters of Xiantouling, Shenzhen. In Shenzhen Municipal Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology (Ed.), 2006’s Excavation report from Xiantouling, Shenzhen (pp. 407–421). Beijing: Cultural Relics Publishing House (Shenzhen Xiantouling Chutu Shupibu Shipai Jishu Jiegou深圳咸頭嶺出土樹皮布石拍技術結構, Shenzhen Xiantouling 2006 nianfajuebaogao,《深圳咸頭嶺2006年發掘報告》,北京:文物出版社,2013年).Google Scholar
  38. Tang, C., & Tang Hayashi, M. (2017). Origins of Barkcloth: A techno-typological analysis of beaters in South China and Southeast Asia. In M. Charleux (Ed.), TAPA: from tree bark to cloth, an ancient art of Oceania. From Southeast Asia to Eastern Polynesia (pp. 59–67). Paris: Somogy.Google Scholar
  39. The First South China Archaeology Team, CASS and Hainan Museum. (2016). Neolithic cultural remains in the coastal area of southeastern Hainan Province. Chinese Archaeology, 17, 3–18 (海南東南部沿海地區新石器時代遺存,《考古》,第七期,2016年,頁3-18). http://doi.org/10.1515/char-2017-0001.
  40. Thiel, B. (1986). Excavations at Arku Cave, Northeast Luzon, Philippines. Asian Perspectives, 27(2), 229–264.Google Scholar
  41. Tolstoy, P. (1963). Division of Anthropology: Cultural parallels between Southeast Asia and Mesoamerica in the Manufacture of barkcloth. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 25, 646–662.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1963.tb01485.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tolstoy, P. (1991). Paper Route: Were the manufacture and use of bark paper introduced into Mesoamerica from Asia? Natural History, 6, 6–14.Google Scholar
  43. Tree Valley Foundation. (2010). Preliminary report on the rescue excavation and construction monitoring of the Dalongdong site. Taipei: Department of Cultural Affairs, Taipei City Government (Dalongdong Yizhi Qiangjiu Fajue Ji Shigong Jiankan Jihua Qichu Baogao《大龍洞遺址搶救發掘及施工監看計畫期初報告》,臺灣市政府文化局委託財團法人樹谷文化基金會執行之報告,2010年).Google Scholar
  44. Tree Valley Foundation. (2012). Report on the rescue excavation and construction monitoring of the Dalongdong site. Taipei: Department of Cultural Affairs, Taipei City Government (Dalongdong Yizhi Qiangjiu Fajue Ji Shigong Jiankan Jihua Chengguo Baogao《大龍洞遺址搶救發掘及施工監看計畫成果中報告》,臺灣市政府文化局委託財團法人樹谷文化基金會執行之報告,2012年).Google Scholar
  45. Tryon, D. (1995). Proto-Austronesian and the major Austronesian Subgroups. In P. Bellwood, J. J. Fox, & D. Tryon (Eds.), The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 19–41). Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  46. Yamagata, M., & Matsumura, H. (2017). Austronesian migration to central Vietnam: Crossing over the Iron Age Southeast Asian Sea. In P. J. Piper, H. Matsumura, & D. Bulbeck (Eds.), New perspectives in Southeast Asian and Pacific Prehistory (pp. 333–356). Canberra: ANU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Yuxi City Department of Relics Preservation, and Tonghai County Culture Bureau. (1999). Excavation Report on TonghaiHaidong Shell Midden Site. Cultural Relics of Yunnan, 2, 11–27 (Tonghai Haidong Beiqiu Yizhi Fajue Bagao 通海海東貝丘遺址發掘報告,《雲南文物》,第二期,1999年,頁11-27).Google Scholar
  48. Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Wenshan Zhuang and Miao and Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture Departments of Relics Preservation. (2008). Archaeological report of the border region of Yunnan province. Kunming: Yunnan Technology Publishing House (Yunnan Bianjing Diqu Kaogu Diaocha Baogao《雲南邊境地區(文山州和紅河州)考古調查報告》, 昆明:雲南科技出版社,2008年).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maya Hayashi Tang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kim Dung Nguyen
    • 2
  • Mana Hayashi Tang
    • 3
  • Chung Tang
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of HistoryThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.Vietnam Institute of ArchaeologyHanoiVietnam
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Cultural HeritageShandong UniversityQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations