Chapter Six: Gatekeepers in a Mixed Private/Public System

  • Fran CollyerEmail author


The recent dramatic growth in private healthcare in Australia’s mixed public/private healthcare system has brought a new imperative to the investigation of decision-making and choice. This chapter draws on a study of key players in the healthcare system, the ‘gatekeepers’ who control access to resources and services and shape patients’ experiences of healthcare. The analysis draws on in-depth interviews with 43 gatekeepers (general practitioners [GPs], specialists, nurses, hospital administrators and policy-makers) in the private, public and not-for-profit sectors. Employing Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus, field, market and state, the study explores the impact of neoliberalism on the gatekeepers, finding connections between their perspectives on the state, the market and social justice, and their locations within the field. The analysis provides insight into differing perceptions of ‘public’, ‘private’, the role of the state and social justice across this key group of actors, and suggests neoliberalism has had both direct and indirect effects on their understandings and practices.



I would like to acknowledge the participants of the gatekeeper study for their time and thoughtful contribution to this project; the Australian Research Council and the University of Sydney for funding the field work; and colleagues, including Karen Willis and Sophie Lewis, without whom the project would not have been either successful or enjoyable; and Jon Gabe of Royal Holloway, University of London, for his thoughtful comments on the manuscript.

Note: Approval for the gatekeeper study was sought from a plethora of ethics committees at a variety of institutions. Primarily this was the Human Ethics Committee (HEC) at the University of Sydney, as well as the various authorities with responsibility for ethical conduct in the public hospital system in each state.


  1. Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the State: Lectures at the College de France 1989–1992 (edited by Champage et al., translated by David Fernbach). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in Question (translated by R. Nice). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), pp. 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. In: R.E. Collins, J. Curran, N. Garnham, P. Scannell, P. Schlesinger and C. Sparks (eds.) Media Culture and Society: A Critical Reader. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (eds.) (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, J. (2004). Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neo-liberalism. International Social Policy, 33(1), pp. 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collyer, F.M. (2018). Envisaging the healthcare sector as a field? Social Theory and Health, 16(2), pp. 111–126.Google Scholar
  9. Collyer, F.M., Harley, K. and Short, S.D. (2015). Money and markets in Australia’s healthcare system. In: G. Meagher and S. Goodwin (eds.) Markets, Rights and Power in Australian Social Policy. Sydney: Sydney University Press. pp. 257–291.Google Scholar
  10. Collyer, F.M. and White, K.N. (2011). The privatisation of medicare and the national health service, and the global marketisation of healthcare systems. Health Sociology Review, 20(3), pp. 238–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collyer, F.M., Willis, K. and Lewis, S. (2017). Gatekeepers in the healthcare sector: knowledge and Bourdieu’s concept of field. Social Science and Medicine, 186, pp. 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Correia, T. (2013). The interplay between managerialism and medical professionalism in hospital organisations from the doctors’ perspective. Health Sociology Review, 22(3), pp. 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dent, M. (1991). Autonomy and the medical profession. In: C. Smith, D. Knights and H. Willmott (eds.) White-Collar Work. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Doggett, J. and McAuley, I. (2013). A new approach to health funding. D!ssent, 42(Spring 2013). Available at: [Accessed 28 Feb. 2015].
  15. Ebbinghaus, B. and Naumann, E. (2018). The popularity of pension and unemployment policies revisited. In: B. Ebbinghaus and E. Naumann (eds.) Welfare State Reforms Seen From Below: Comparing Public Attitudes and Organized Interests in Britain and Germany. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 155–186.Google Scholar
  16. Freidson, E. (1985). The reorganisation of the medical profession. Medical Care Review, 42, pp. 11–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heaton, T.B. (1987). Objective status and class consciousness. Social Science Quarterly, 68(3), pp. 611–620.Google Scholar
  18. Humphrey, C. and Russell, J. (2004). Motivation and values of hospital consultants in south-east England who work in the national health service and do private practice. Social Science and Medicine, 59, pp. 1241–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Humphrys, E. (2018). How Labour Built Neoliberalism. Brill.Google Scholar
  20. Jacobs, K. (1995). Budgets: a medium of organizational transformation. Management Accounting Research, 6, pp. 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelley, J. and Sikora, J. (2002). Australian public opinion on privatisation, 1986–2002. Growth, 50(December 2002), pp. 54–59.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, S., Willis, K. and Collyer, F.M. (2018). Navigating and making choices about healthcare: the role of place. Health and Place, 52, pp. 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinussen, P.E. and Magnussen, J. (2011). Resisting market-inspired reform in healthcare: the role of professional subcultures in medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 73, pp. 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meagher, G. and Goodwin, S. (eds.) (2015). Markets, Rights and Power in Australian Social Policy. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Meagher, G. and Wilson, S. (2015). The politics of market encroachment. In: G. Meagher and S. Goodwin (eds.) Markets, Rights and Power in Australian Social Policy. Sydney: Sydney University Press. pp. 29–96.Google Scholar
  26. Mills, C.W. (1957). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Neumann, E. (2018). Increasing conflict in times of retrenchment? attitudes towards healthcare provision in Europe between 1996 and 2002. In: B. Ebbinghaus and E. Naumann (eds.) Welfare State Reforms Seen From Below. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 245–271.Google Scholar
  28. Productivity Commission. (2005). Australia’s Health Workforce. Research Report, Canberra.Google Scholar
  29. Scott, W.R. (1982). Managing professional work. Health Services Research, 17(Fall), pp. 213–240.Google Scholar
  30. Tousijn, W. (2006). Beyond decline: consumerism, managerialism and the need for a new medical professionalism. Health Sociology Review, 15(5), pp. 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waitzkin, H., Yager, J. and Santos, R. (2012). Advancing the business creed? The framing of decisions about public sector managed care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 34(1), pp. 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wendt, C. and Naumann, E. (2018). Demand for healthcare reform by public opinion and medical professionals. In: B. Ebbinghaus and E. Naumann (eds.) Welfare State Reforms Seen From Below. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 129–152.Google Scholar
  33. Wilkes, M., Coulter, I. and Hurwitz, E. (1998). Medical, law and business students: perceptions of the changing health care system. Social Science and Medicine, 47(8), pp. 1043–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Willis, K., Collyer, F.M., Lewis, S., Gabe, J., Flaherty, I. and Calnan, M. (2016). Knowledge matters: producing and using knowledge to navigate healthcare systems. Health Sociology Review, 25(2), pp. 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilson, S., Meagher, G. and Breusch, T. (2005). Where to for the welfare state? In: S. Wilson (ed.) Australian Social Attitudes: The First Report. Sydney: UNSW Press. pp. 101–121.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, S., Meagher, G. and Hermes, K. (2012). A new role for government? Trends in social policy preferences since the mid-1980s,. In: J. Pietsch and H. Aarons (eds.) Australia: Identity, Fear, and Governance in the 21st Century. Canberra: Australian National University, ePress. pp. 107–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology and Social PolicyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations