Fundamentals of Crop Rotation in Agronomic Management

  • Muhammad Tariq
  • Hakoomat Ali
  • Nazim Hussain
  • Wajid Nasim
  • Muhammad Mubeen
  • Shakeel AhmadEmail author
  • Mirza Hasanuzzaman


Crop rotation has been used as an effective tool of pest, disease, and weed management since distant past which dates back to the Roman and Greek times. The magnitude of yield improvement and other associated benefits of crop rotation may vary with crops because some crops are quite responsive, while others showed a bit yield improvement. However, the management of these issues from crop rotation disappeared during the twentieth century due to easy access to synthetic inputs. No doubt it is also equally effective in the current scenario to solve problems like stagnant yield, resource depletion, and reduced reliance on synthetic inputs. The write-up of the chapter was based on assessing the benefits of crop rotation and highlighting its significance for successful management of issues related to continuous cropping. The cropping practices remain uniform and invariable if the same crop is grown on a long-term basis. It promotes the pest pressure buildup and reduces the resource-use efficiency. Crop rotation improves farm productivity, but adaptation by growers is limited because small piece of land required independent management which is quite difficult and hinders mechanization. Certain principles have been laid to improve the effectiveness of crop rotation to meet specific objective. The importance of crop rotation was realized again, and now it has become an important agenda among agriculture experts for the management of issues related to present agriculture.


Rotation Principles History Constrains 


  1. Angus JF, Desmarchelier JM, Gardner PA, Green A, Hocking PJ, Howe GN, Kirkegaard JA, Marcroft S, Mead AJ, Pitson GD, Potter TD, Ryan MH, Sarwar M, van Herwaarden AF, and Wong PTW (1999) Canola and Indian mustard as break crops for wheat. Proceedings of International Rapeseed Conference, Canberra, September 1999Google Scholar
  2. Ashton TS (1948) The industrial revolution (3rd printing 1965 ed.) Oxford University Press, New York, p 21Google Scholar
  3. Burmester CH, Reeves DW, Motta ACV (2002) Effect of crop rotation/tillage systems on cotton yield in the Tennessee valley area of Alabama, 1980–2001. Proceedings of 25th Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference Sustain Agriculture Auburn, 24–26 June 2002Google Scholar
  4. Carpentier A, Gohin A (2015) On the economic theory of crop rotations: value of the crop rotation effects and implications on acreage choice modeling. Working Paper SMART – LERECO N°15–04Google Scholar
  5. Castellazzi MS, Wood GA, Burgess PJ, Morris J, Conrad KF, Perry JN (2008) A systematic representation of crop rotations. Agric Syst 97:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. David FB, Granatstein D (1989) Crop rotation efficiencies and biological diversity in farming systems. Americ J Alternative Agric 4:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dogliotti S, Rossing WAH, Vanittersum MK (2003) ROTAT, a tool for systematically generating crop rotations. Eur J Agron 9(2):239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elkins CB (1985) Plant roots as tillage tools. Proceedings of International Conference Soil Dynamics, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama pp. 519–523Google Scholar
  9. El-Nazer T, McCarl BA (1986) The choice of crop rotation: a modeling approach and case study. Amer J Agric Econ 68(1):127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO (2002) Conservation agriculture: case studies in Latin America and Africa. FAO soils bulletin. FAO: Rome 78Google Scholar
  11. Gaudin ACM, Tolhurst TN, Ker AP, Janovicek K, Tortora C, Martin RC et al (2015) Increasing crop diversity mitigates weather variations and improves yield stability. PLoS One 10(2):e0113261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerowitt B, Isselstein J, Marggraf R (2003) Rewards for ecological goods—requirements and perspectives for agricultural land-use. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Government of Prince Edward Island (1996) Cultivating island solutions. Interim report of the round table on resource land use and stewardship, Department of Agriculture and Forestry, Charlottetown, PEIGoogle Scholar
  14. Helmers GA, Yamoah C, Varvel GE (2001) Separating the impacts of crop diversification and rotations on risk. Agron J 93:1337–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hennessy DA (2006) On monoculture and the structure of crop rotations. Am J Agric Econ 88:900–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson TC (1927) Crop rotation in relation to soil productivity. J Am Soc Agron 19:518–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karlen DL, Varvel GE, Bullock DG, Cruse RM (1994) Crop rotations for the 21st century. Adv Agron 53:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katsvairo C (2000) Economics of cropping systems featuring different tillage, rotation and management systems. Agron J 92:485–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleczewski N (2013) Basics to soybean disease management. University of Delaware Cooperative Extension.
  20. Leteinturier B, Herman JL, de Longueville F, Quintin L, Oger R (2006) Adaptation of a crop sequence indicator based on a land parcel management system. Agric Ecosys Environ 112:324–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lopez-Bellido L, Fuentes M, Castillo IE, Lopez-Garrido FJ, Fernando EJ (1996) Long-term tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilizer effects on wheat yield under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Agron J 88:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacRae RJ, Mehuys GR (1985) The effect of green manuring on the physical properties of temperate-area soils. Adv Soil Sci 3:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin JH, Leonard WH, Stamp DL (1976) Fertilizer, green manuring, and rotation practices. In principles of field crop production, 3rd edn. The Macmillan Co, New York, p 166Google Scholar
  24. Meisner MH, Rosenheim JA (2014) Eco informatics reveals effects of crop rotational histories on cotton yield. PLoS One 9(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohler CL, Johnson SE (2009) Crop rotation on organic farms: a planning manual, published by Nraes, july 2009Google Scholar
  26. Parker CP (1915) Field management and crop rotation. Webb St Paul MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  27. Piorr HP (2003) Environmental policy. Agri-environmental indicators and landscape indicators. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Praveen-Kumar, Aggarwal RK, Power JF (1997) Cropping systems: effects on soil quality indicators and yield of pearl millet in an and region. Am J Altern Agric 12:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Remet L (2004) Fiche MEMO: La formationdes Etatse urope’ens,11e–13e. sie’cles, Hachette. Consultation date: 30/09/2004,
  30. Rotem G, Ziv Y (2016) Crop diversity and rotation may increase dispersal opportunities of reptiles in a heterogeneous agroecosystem. Agric Ecosys Environ 235:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rusinamhodzi L (2015) Crop rotations and residue management in conservation agriculture. In: Farooq M, Siddique KHM (eds) Conservation agriculture. Springer, Cham. Scholar
  32. Schönharta M, Schmida E, Schneiderb UA (2011) CropRota–A crop rotation model to support integrated land use assessments. Europ J Agronomy 34:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steinmann HH, Dobers ES (2013) Spatio-temporal analysis of crop rotations and crop sequence patterns in northern Germany: potential implications on plant health and crop protection. J Plant Dis Protection 120(2):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stetina SR, Young LD, Pettigrew WT, Bruns HA (2007) Impact of corn-cotton rotations on reniform nematode populations and crop yield. J Nematropica 37:237–248Google Scholar
  35. Stöckle CO, Donatelli M, Nelson R (2003) Crop Syst, a cropping systems simulation model. Europ J Agron 18:289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stone RP, Moore N (1996) Lamaîtrise de l’e’rosion du sol. Fiche technique. Ministe’re de l’agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario (Canada). Consultation date: 09/02/2004,
  37. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vyn T (2006) Meeting the ethanol demand: consequences and compromises associated with more corn on corn in Indiana. Purdue Ext Bull ID, p 336Google Scholar
  39. White KD (1970) Fallowing, crop rotation, and crop yields in Roman times. Agric Hist 44:281–290Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Tariq
    • 1
  • Hakoomat Ali
    • 2
  • Nazim Hussain
    • 2
  • Wajid Nasim
    • 3
  • Muhammad Mubeen
    • 3
  • Shakeel Ahmad
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mirza Hasanuzzaman
    • 4
  1. 1.Central Cotton Research InstituteMultanPakistan
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyBahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan
  3. 3.COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyVehariPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Agronomy, Faculty of AgricultureSher-e-Bangla Agricultural UniversityDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations