Advertisement

Ethics, Self-Study Research Methodology and Teacher Education

  • Robyn BrandenburgEmail author
  • Sharon McDonough
Chapter
Part of the Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices book series (STEP, volume 20)

Abstract

What does it mean to be an ethical self-study researcher? It is well understood that educational research, particularly social research, is fundamentally and inherently underpinned by ethical practices, responsibilities and professional obligations (Ginsberg & Mertens, 2013; Lapadat, 2017; Zeni, 2001). Ethical research practice reflects a researcher’s moral sense (Kitchener & Kitchener, 2013) and includes addressing ethical principles such as justice; gaining informed consent; “do no harm” (Ernst, 2009); respect; beneficence and reciprocity. Regulatory boards, such as Internal Review Boards and Human Research Ethics Committees, provide guidelines and frameworks for ethical research conduct, and these expectations may be culturally driven and context specific. While research ethics and ethical practice have been extensively examined in broader qualitative and quantitative paradigms, this volume specifically examines the role of ethics in self-study research. In many ways, the self-study ethics research presented in this volume reflects what has been described as “metaethics” which is a practice that “asks questions about the meaning of ethical words, the logic of justifying moral decisions and the reality of moral properties” (Ginsberg & Mertens, 2013, p. 2).

References

  1. Berry, A. (2007). Tensions in teaching about teaching: A self-study of the development of myself as a teacher educator. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful Pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandenburg, R., & Gervasoni, A. (2010). Engaging with ethical practice: A study of ethical issues arising from self-study research. In L. B. Erickson, J. R. Young, & S. Pinnegar (Eds.), Conference proceedings at The Eight International Conference on Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices: Navigating the Public and Private: Negotiating the Diverse Landscapes of Teacher Education (pp. 33–36). Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
  4. Brandenburg, R., & Gervasoni, A. (2012). Rattling the Cage: Moving beyond ethical standards to ethical praxis in self-study research. Studying Teacher Education, 8(2), 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, R., teRiele, K., & Maguire, M. (2014). Ethics and education research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bullough, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2004). Thinking about the thinking about self-study: An analysis of eight chapters. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 313–342). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Coia, L. (2016). Trust in diversity: An autobiographic self-study. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Enacting self-study as methodology for professional inquiry (pp. 311–316). Herstmonsceux, UK: Self-study of Teacher Education Practices SIG.Google Scholar
  10. Crowe, A., & Dinkelman, T. (2010). Self-study and social studies: Framing the conversation. In Advancing social studies education through self-study methodology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3943-9_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. East, K., Fitzgerald, L., & Heston, M. (2009). Talking teaching and learning: Using dialogue in self-study. In Research methods for the self-study of practice.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ernst, P. (2009). What is first philosophy in Mathematics Education? In M. Tzekaki, M. Kalrimidou, & H. Saonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33 rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 25–42). Thessalonili, Greece: PME.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1998). The history of sexuality: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Garbett, D., Brandenburg, R., Thomas, L., & Ovens, A. (2018). Shedding light on our practices: Four assumption hunters on a quest. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Pushing boundaries and crossing borders: Self-study as a means for researching pedagogy (pp. 441–448). Auckland, NZ: Self-study of teacher education practices. Available at www.castle-conference.com Google Scholar
  15. Ginsberg, P. & Mertens, D. (2013). Frontiers in social research: Fertile ground for evolution. In D. Mertens & P. Ginsberg, (2012, Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040326366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2000). On the threshold of a new century: Trustworthiness, integrity, and self-study in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2015). Considering the role of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices research in transforming urban classrooms. Studying Teacher Education, 11(2), 180190.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2015.1045775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitchener, K.S., & Kitchener, R.F. (2013). Social science research ethics: Historical and philosophical issues. In D. Mertens & Ginsberg, P. (2013, Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Kosnik, C. (2001). The effects of an inquiry-oriented teacher education program on a faculty member: Some critical incidents and my journey. Journal of Reflective Teaching, 2(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2008). We taught them about literacy but what did they learn? The impact of a preservice teacher education program on the practice of beginning teachers. Studying Teacher Education, 4(2), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2009). Teacher education for literacy teaching: Research at the personal, institutional, and collective levels. In D. Tidwell, M. Heston, & L. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (p. 2009). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Kosnik, C., Freese, A., Samaras, A., & Beck, C. (Eds.). (2006). Making a difference in teacher education through self-study: Studies of personal, professional, and program renewal. Dordetcht, The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lapadat, J. C. (2017). Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8), 589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (Trans. A. Lingis). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (Eds.). (2002). Improving teacher education practice through self-study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Loughran, J. J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Zwart, R. (2010). Learning and working in a research community: A multi-layered self-study. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. LaBoskey & Mitchell, I. (2004). Identifying ethical issues in self-study proposals. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. LaBoskey & T. Russell (Eds.). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 1393–1442). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. McDonough, S. (2015). Using ethical mapping for exploring two professional dilemmas in initial teacher education. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 142–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McDonough, S., & Brandenburg, R. (2012). Examining assumptions about teacher educator identities by self-study of the role of mentor of pre-service teachers. Studying Teacher Education, 8(2), 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mertens, D., & Ginsberg, P. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of social research ethics. Thousand Oaks, PA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell, I. (2004). Identifying ethical issues in self-study proposals. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1393–1442). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. National Health and Medical Research Council/Australian Research Council. The National Statement of Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007). The Australian government.Google Scholar
  35. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Pickering, L., & Kara, H. (2017). Presenting and representing others: Towards an ethics of engagement. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(3), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Redwood, S., & Todres, L. (2006). Exploring the ethical imagination: Conversation as practice versus committee as gatekeeper. Qualitative Social Research, 7(2), 38–45.Google Scholar
  40. Samaras, A. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Schön, D. A. (Ed.). (1991). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(1), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, M., Klein, E. J., & Abrams, L. (2014). Tensions of reimagining our roles as teacher educators in a third space: Revisiting a co/autoethnography through a faculty lens. Studying Teacher Education, 10, 3–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2013.866549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zeni, J. (2001). Ethical issues in teacher research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationFederation University AustraliaBallaratAustralia

Personalised recommendations