Advertisement

Teleology in History and Intellectual Responsibility

  • Kenneth E. BauzonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This concluding chapter assesses the divergent notions of teleology—that of empire, representing the accumulation of value for private gain, on the one hand, and that of the anti-imperialist emancipatory movement, representing community and solidarity, on the other, but both representing contradictory interpretations of the Enlightenment’s legacy. This assessment demonstrates the empire’s logic of growth and expansion, conditioned by a supremacist ideology couched in liberal terms conflating democracy with accumulation of value, individual freedom with social justice, and human progress with conquest and domination. Legitimated by the rules of neoliberal globalization, this imperial logic has, in reality, meant no less than the subjugation and subordination of others, the exploitation and ravaging of the environment, and the holding of mankind’s future hostage to a nuclear holocaust in a bid to maintain US imperial hegemony. A final note from San Juan affirms the verity of historical materialism and upholds the anti-imperialist ethos of emancipatory movements in the Third World and elsewhere.

References

  1. Bauzon, Kenneth E., “Political Forecasting and the Third World Economies: A Critical Assessment”, Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 15, 1 (2000): 23–64. In: https://www.academia.edu/3382032/Political_forecasting_and_the_Third_World_economies_a_critical_assessment.
  2. Klein, Naomi, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014), 576pp.Google Scholar
  3. OXFAM International, Even It Up: Time to End Extreme Inequality, Report (Oxford, UK: Oxfam GB, October 2014), 136pp. In: https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/cr-even-it-up-extreme-inequality-291014-en.pdf.
  4. ———, Public Good or Private Wealth? OXFAM Briefing Paper (London, UK: Oxfam GB, January 2019), 106pp. In: https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/620599/bp-public-good-or-private-wealth-210119-en.pdf?utm_source=indepth.
  5. San Juan, E., Jr., After Postcolonialism: Remapping Philippines-United States Confrontations (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000), 272pp. Recipient, The Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Human Rights in the United States Outstanding Book on Human Rights for 2001. Recipient, The Association of Asian American Studies Book Award for 2001.Google Scholar
  6. ———, In the Wake of Terror; Class, Race, Nation, Ethnicity in the Postmodern World (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007a), 232pp.Google Scholar
  7. ———, “Jose Rizal: Re-discovering the Revolutionary Filipino Hero in the Age of Terrorism”, Afterword (Modified, 2011d) to Rizal in Our Time: Essays in Interpretation (Pasig City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing, 1997), 144pp. In: https://www.univie.ac.at/ksa/apsis/aufi/rizal/RediscoveringRIZAL.pdf.
  8. ———, U.S. Imperialism and Revolution in the Philippines (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007b), 265pp. Print.Google Scholar
  9. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Humanity Divided; Confronting Inequality in Developing Countries (New York: November 2013). In: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Poverty%20Reduction/Inclusive%20development/Humanity%20Divided/HumanityDivided_Full-Report.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Joseph’s College—New YorkBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations