Advertisement

The World-Class University Discourse: Disentangling the Conflict Between Efficiency and World Class-Ness

  • Aishna Sharma
Chapter

Abstract

The discourse of world class universities has very recently swept the Indian higher education policy, a concept which has been burgeoning globally for quite some time now. A world-class university is the one which is held to be amongst the best in the world; it is ideally premised on academic freedom and displays high-quality output. What underlies this quest for achieving world-class status is competitiveness amongst the universities, inside the country and also with universities globally. There is always a comparison between universities and thus the ranking discourse is rendered legitimacy.

The paper tries to address two related and consecutive objectives. The first is to understand the concept (and nature) of competition as would ensue between universities in applying for world-class status. The competition would exclude many universities not well equipped. With competition being restricted to only a few universities, the second objective would be to look at what kind of efficient practices pertaining to dynamic efficiency, internal efficiency and allocative efficiency would possibly take place, as the potential universities compete. The paper concludes by highlighting the contradiction between the pursuit of efficiency and academic freedom on the one hand and quality on the other, the two crucial pillars for a university to emerge as world class.

Keywords

World-class university Competition Efficiency Academic freedom 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2015). The cost and benefits of world class universities. International higher education, 5–8. Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/viewFile/7381/6578.
  2. Altbach, P. G., & Balan, G. (2007). Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America world class worldwide. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  3. Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence. In The making of world-class research universities. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 299–301.Google Scholar
  5. Doherty, R. (2007). Critically framing education policy: Foucault, discourse and governmentality. In M. A. Peters & T. Besley (Eds.), Why Foucault? New directions in educational research. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 1972–1977). Great Britain: Harvester Press Limited.Google Scholar
  7. Glennester, H. (1991). Quasi market for education. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1268–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Government of India. (2016a). National Institutional Ranking Framework. A methodology for ranking of universities and colleges in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.Google Scholar
  9. Government of India. (2016b). UGC (world class institutions deemed to be universities) regulations (p. 2016). New Delhi: UGC.Google Scholar
  10. Government of India. (2017). National Institutional Ranking Framework. A methodology for ranking of universities and colleges in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.Google Scholar
  11. Green, D. (1994). What is quality in higher education? Concepts, policy and practice. In D. Green (Ed.), What is quality in higher education? (pp. 13–30). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jongbloed, B. (2004). Regulation and competition in higher education. In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or reality. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Kumar, T. R. (2015). World class universities: Indian experiment. Economic and Political Weekly, 159(48), 36–40.Google Scholar
  14. Lockheed, M. E. & Eric Hanushek. (1994). Concepts of educational efficiency and effectiveness. Working Paper, US: World Bank.Google Scholar
  15. Majumdar, T. (1983). Investment in education and social choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Marginson, S. (2007). Are neo-liberal reforms friendly to academic creativity? Paper presented at the University of Melbourne Seminar ‘Ideas and Issues in higher education’, Centre for Study of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.189.5354&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  17. Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marginson, S. (2014). University ranking and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Massy, W. (2004). Markets in higher education: Do they promote internal efficiency? In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research (pp. 297–306). Rand Corporation. Retrieved from http://cstpr.colorado.edu/students/envs_5100/nelson_1959.pdf.
  21. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patnaik, P. (2007). Alternative perspectives on higher education. Social Scientist, 35(11/12), 3–14.Google Scholar
  23. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalising education policy. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world class universities. Washington DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shattock, M. (2017). The world class university and international ranking systems: What are the policy implications for governments and institutions? Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 1(1), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sporn, B. (2007). Governance and administration: Organisational and structural trends. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education, part one: Global themes and contemporary challenges (pp. 141–157). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Tam, M. (2001). Measuring quality and performance in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 7(1), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toonen, T. (2007). Public sector reform in the knowledge based economy. In J. Enders & B. Jongloed (Eds.), Public-private dynamics in higher education. Bielefeld: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Winston, G. C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Winston, G. C. (2000). Positional arms race in higher education. WPEHE paper series. Williams College.Google Scholar

Websites

  1. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/education/six-universities-granted-institute-of-eminence-status/article24370554.eceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aishna Sharma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Public PolicySchool of Management and Entrepreneurship, Shiv Nadar UniversityNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations