The World-Class University Discourse: Disentangling the Conflict Between Efficiency and World Class-Ness
The discourse of world class universities has very recently swept the Indian higher education policy, a concept which has been burgeoning globally for quite some time now. A world-class university is the one which is held to be amongst the best in the world; it is ideally premised on academic freedom and displays high-quality output. What underlies this quest for achieving world-class status is competitiveness amongst the universities, inside the country and also with universities globally. There is always a comparison between universities and thus the ranking discourse is rendered legitimacy.
The paper tries to address two related and consecutive objectives. The first is to understand the concept (and nature) of competition as would ensue between universities in applying for world-class status. The competition would exclude many universities not well equipped. With competition being restricted to only a few universities, the second objective would be to look at what kind of efficient practices pertaining to dynamic efficiency, internal efficiency and allocative efficiency would possibly take place, as the potential universities compete. The paper concludes by highlighting the contradiction between the pursuit of efficiency and academic freedom on the one hand and quality on the other, the two crucial pillars for a university to emerge as world class.
KeywordsWorld-class university Competition Efficiency Academic freedom
- Altbach, P. G. (2015). The cost and benefits of world class universities. International higher education, 5–8. Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/viewFile/7381/6578.
- Altbach, P. G., & Balan, G. (2007). Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America world class worldwide. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
- Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence. In The making of world-class research universities. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Ball, S. J. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 299–301.Google Scholar
- Doherty, R. (2007). Critically framing education policy: Foucault, discourse and governmentality. In M. A. Peters & T. Besley (Eds.), Why Foucault? New directions in educational research. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 1972–1977). Great Britain: Harvester Press Limited.Google Scholar
- Government of India. (2016a). National Institutional Ranking Framework. A methodology for ranking of universities and colleges in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.Google Scholar
- Government of India. (2016b). UGC (world class institutions deemed to be universities) regulations (p. 2016). New Delhi: UGC.Google Scholar
- Government of India. (2017). National Institutional Ranking Framework. A methodology for ranking of universities and colleges in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.Google Scholar
- Green, D. (1994). What is quality in higher education? Concepts, policy and practice. In D. Green (Ed.), What is quality in higher education? (pp. 13–30). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Jongbloed, B. (2004). Regulation and competition in higher education. In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or reality. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kumar, T. R. (2015). World class universities: Indian experiment. Economic and Political Weekly, 159(48), 36–40.Google Scholar
- Lockheed, M. E. & Eric Hanushek. (1994). Concepts of educational efficiency and effectiveness. Working Paper, US: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Majumdar, T. (1983). Investment in education and social choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Marginson, S. (2007). Are neo-liberal reforms friendly to academic creativity? Paper presented at the University of Melbourne Seminar ‘Ideas and Issues in higher education’, Centre for Study of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.189.5354&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Massy, W. (2004). Markets in higher education: Do they promote internal efficiency? In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research (pp. 297–306). Rand Corporation. Retrieved from http://cstpr.colorado.edu/students/envs_5100/nelson_1959.pdf.
- Patnaik, P. (2007). Alternative perspectives on higher education. Social Scientist, 35(11/12), 3–14.Google Scholar
- Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalising education policy. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sporn, B. (2007). Governance and administration: Organisational and structural trends. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education, part one: Global themes and contemporary challenges (pp. 141–157). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Toonen, T. (2007). Public sector reform in the knowledge based economy. In J. Enders & B. Jongloed (Eds.), Public-private dynamics in higher education. Bielefeld: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Winston, G. C. (2000). Positional arms race in higher education. WPEHE paper series. Williams College.Google Scholar
- https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/education/six-universities-granted-institute-of-eminence-status/article24370554.eceGoogle Scholar