Advertisement

Global Wars, National Legacies, and State Controls: The Dilemmas of Institutionalism of Public Universities

  • Manisha Priyam
Chapter

Abstract

This piece attempts to analyse some of the dilemmas of institutionalism with respect to public universities in postcolonial societies and the developing world in the era of globalisation. Higher education in postcolonial societies has been developed on account of complex efforts to build national capacities. These societies aspired to build public universities and provide higher education to their masses as a part of their aspirations for nation building following the struggle for independence. Hitherto, universities had been seen as an exclusive institutional preserve of the Western world – the ‘core’ where these ideas grew as central public institutions. In contrast, in postcolonial societies, universities were like a less developed ‘periphery’ (as compared to the West). Yet, they were public institutions on which hopes of both freedom and development were pinned. In Nyere’s Tanzania, they were to be vehicles of both national self-reliance and self-respect.

However, the epochal transformations being brought about by globalisation is now dislodging national capabilities in the developing world, and creating economic competition on a global scale. State controls are being criticised for their command and control approach, and rampant privatisation is the way forward to address the challenge of increasing participation of the masses in higher education. These changes undermine the public character of universities as institutions of critical thought, and higher education as a public good. Some scholars, however, have been optimistic about the potential of globalisation for flattening erstwhile asymmetries between the centre and the periphery, and the possibility that a truly plural university world may come about in the future. With the rise of China and India, for example, the West may not disappear, but will have competition from global equals. In other words, the erstwhile ‘peripheries’ may have a real chance of developing universities of equal calibre and competence as in the developed world. An efficiency metric of global scale can measure performance of universities in a linear way. This chapter argues this may not be the case and provides an embedded critique of globalisation and its offerings for higher education in the developing world. Based on a review of many contemporary changes – such as a China-Africa cooperation in higher education, or the emergence of ‘BRICS’ as economic powers of significance, and of executive policy making in India – attempting to build a top-funnel of world-class institutions, it is argued that this race is by no means one of the global equals. Rankings reaffirm the domination of erstwhile academic superpowers, and the structural transformations associated with globalisation are such that universities are being judged less by their publicness and service of public interest. Further, there is increasing dualism and inequality in access to higher education in the developing world, especially as the socially disadvantaged now seek access to universities as a part of their struggle for substantive citizenship.

Keywords

Public university Nationalism, Massification Institutionalism Political economy of higher education Global competition, globalization and higher education 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (Eds.). (2011). The road to academic excellence. The making of world-class research universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Breeze, V., & Moore, N. (2017). Why African students are choosing China. Available at https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2017-06-29/china-second-most-popular-country-for-african-students. Accessed 21 Nov 2018.
  3. Burgess, L. M. (2016). Conversations with African Students in China. Transition: An International Review, 119, 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84(1), 7–43.Google Scholar
  5. Calderon, A. (2018, June 22). The higher education landscape is changing fast. University World News, Issue No. 511. Available at http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=2018062208555853. Accessed 23 Nov 2018.
  6. Darvas, P., Gao, S., Shen, Y., & Bawany, B. (2017). Sharing higher education’s promise beyond the few in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Education and Power in Nigeria by Paul Beckett and James O’Connell London, Hodder and Stoughton, 1978. Pp. 224, and Political Values and the Educated Class in Africa by Ali A. Mazrui London, Heinemann, 1978. Pp. xiv + 392, review by Tunde Adeniran (1980). The Journal of Modern African Studies, 18, pp. 168–170.Google Scholar
  8. Futao, H. (2012). Higher education from massification to universal access: A perspective from Japan. Higher Education, 63(2), 257–270.Google Scholar
  9. Gumport, P., Ianozzi, M., Shaman, S., & Zemsky, R. (1997). Trends in United States higher education: From massification to post massification. National Center for Postsecondary Improvement. Stanford: Stanford University. Available at https://web.stanford.edu/group/ncpi/documents/pdfs/1-04_massification.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2018.
  10. Hartig, F. (2015). Communicating China to the world: Confucius institutes and China’s strategic narratives. Politics, 35(3–4), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkins, J. N., Moh, K., & Neubauer, D. (2018). In Wu & Hawkins (Eds.), The many faces of Asia Pacific higher education in the era of massification (pp. 1–8). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education. The battle for world-class excellence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hertig, H.-P. (2016). Universities, rankings, and the dynamics of global higher education: Perspectives from Asia, Europe and North America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffrey, C. (2010). Timepass: Youth, class, and time among unemployed young men in India. American Ethnologist, 37(3), 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang, Y. (2011). The role of private education in the Chinese higher education system. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 15, 377–400.Google Scholar
  16. Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Human Resources Development. (2018). The all India survey of higher education 2017–18. MoHRD: GoI. Available at https://epsiindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/AISHE-2017-18.pdf. Last Accessed 28 June 2019.
  18. Ministry of Human Resources Development. (2019). Draft new education policy, 2019. MoHRD: GoI.Google Scholar
  19. Nanda, P. K. (2018). Flow of Indian students to the US slows to a five year low. Live mint (Newspaper). 14 November, New Delhi. Available at https://www.livemint.com/Politics/XIMkOAAr2TcehexfAHj5DJ/Number-of-Indians-studying-in-US-up-by-54-since-last-year.html. Accessed 2 July 2019.
  20. Ngalomba, S. (2017, December 15). The merits of equality in Africa-China HE collaborations. University World News, No.487. Available at http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20171215083710824. Accessed 25 Nov 2018.
  21. Patnaik, P. (2014). Learning as commodity: The dualistic nature of Indian higher education. The telegraph (Newspaper). Kolkata, April 17, 2014. Available at: https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/learning-as-commodity-the-dualistic-structure-of-indian-higher-education/cid/197078. Accessed 2 July 2019.
  22. Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sautman, B., & Hairong, Y. (2007). Friends and interests: China’s distinctive links with Africa. African Studies Review, 50(3), 75–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sinha, A. (2016). Globalizing India: How global rules and markets are shaping India’s rise to power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trow, M. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education, in policies for higher education, from the general report on the conference on “Future structures of post-secondary education”, pp. 55–101. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  26. Trow, M. (2005). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In P. Altbach (Ed.), International handbook of higher education. Norwell: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. Umarji, V. (2018). Flow of Indian students to US for academic year 2018-19 dip by 30%. Business Standard, (Newspaper). April 2, Ahmedabad. https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/flow-of-indian-students-to-us-for-academic-year-2018-19-dip-by-30-118040200014_1.html.
  28. Wu, A. M., & Hawkins, J. (Eds.). (2018). Massification of higher education in Asia: Consequences, policy response, and changing governance. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manisha Priyam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational PolicyNational Institute of Educational Planning and AdministrationNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations