Understanding Accessibility, Inclusion and Performance of Students with Disabilities in Higher Education: A Case Study of University of Delhi

  • Shalini SaksenaEmail author
  • Rashmi Sharma
  • Bipin Kumar Tiwary


Despite extensive government policies, programmes and legislative initiatives for inclusive education of children with disabilities in India, both the rates of educational participation and outcomes of education remain poor for children and young adults with disabilities. Efforts aimed at achieving equality of opportunity do not translate in to freedom of opportunity for students with disabilities, who find their set of capabilities restricted because of the impairment, and their functionings diminished because of the various barriers posed by their economic resources and surrounding social environment. Barriers in institutions of higher education can be physical, financial, technological, systemic or attitudinal. This paper examines the impact of both physical and attitudinal barriers on academic achievements of students with disabilities in higher education through a case study of the University of Delhi. Econometric analysis of primary data, collected from 168 undergraduate students with disabilities enrolled across 35 colleges, to find the correlates of their academic performance reveals the dominant and detrimental impact of invisible attitudinal barriers based on negative perceptions of ‘dis’-ability. It also highlights the inherent limitations of piecemeal policy responses to provisions for such students, which largely remain focused on elimination of barriers to physical access. Without appropriate policy consideration for remediation, the invisible barriers posed by negative attitudes towards disability can frustrate all other efforts at achieving inclusive education.


Disability; Marginalization; Inclusive education; Attitudinal barriers; Higher education; University of Delhi 


  1. AISHE. (2015–16). All India survey on higher education (2015–16). New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  2. Checchi, D. (2000). University education in Italy. International Journal of Manpower, 21, 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalkilic, M., & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2016). Re-framing inclusive education through the capability approach: An elaboration of the model of relational inclusion. Global Education Review, 3(3), 14–31.Google Scholar
  4. Eamon, M. K. (2005). Social demographic, school, neighborhood and parenting influences on academic achievement of Latino young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(2), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson, A. L. (2006). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: Barriers to success and implication to professionals. Vistas Online. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.
  6. Krashen, S. (2005). The hard work hypothesis: Is doing your homework enough to overcome the effects of poverty? Multicultural Education, 12(4), 16–19.Google Scholar
  7. Mitra, S. (2006). The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 236–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rao, S. (2004). Faculty attitudes and students with disabilities in higher education—A literature review. College Student Journal, 38(2), 191–198.Google Scholar
  9. Saksena, S., & Sharma, R. (2015). Deconstructing barriers to access higher education: A case study of students with disabilities in University of Delhi. The Delhi University Journal of Undergraduate Research and Innovation, 1(2), 316–337.Google Scholar
  10. Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, A., Schneider, B. H., & Ruck, M. D. (2005). Thinking about Makin’ it: Black Canadian students’ beliefs regarding education and academic achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(4), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sweet, R., Anisef, P., Brown, R., Adamuti-Trache, M., & Parekh, G. (2012). Special needs students and transitions to postsecondary education. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.Google Scholar
  13. U-DISE. (2015–16). School education in India. Flash statistics. National University of Educational Planning and Administration, 2016.Google Scholar
  14. UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion. Ensuring access to education for all. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  15. UNESCO. (2010). Education for all global monitoring report 2010: Reaching the marginalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Yinusa, M. A., & Basil, A. O. (2008). Socio-economic factors influencing students academic performance in Nigeria: Some explanation from a local survey. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 319–323.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shalini Saksena
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rashmi Sharma
    • 1
  • Bipin Kumar Tiwary
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Delhi College of Arts & CommerceUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Equal Opportunity CellUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations