Advertisement

Exploring Ethnohistory of Arunachal Pradesh

  • Tana ShowrenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter approaches the historical understanding of preliterate communities with Nyishis of Arunachal Pradesh as a case study by applying both historical and anthropological sources and methods. While reconstructing the historical past of a community, the chapter reveals a process of interaction with other communities and explains the process of ‘othering’ and the emergence of new identity. The chapter is critical about the use of a particular disciplinary approach or source materials like oral tradition while reconstructing the history of preliterate communities and advocates for multidisciplinary approaches by combining archaeology, history, ethnology, ethnotoponymy, ethnopolity and social and cultural anthropology under one rubric. The insider and outsider debate though implicit; the chapter aims at attempting an objective frame of analysis within ethnohistorical perspective to reconstruct composite history of the nation even when a scholar studies one’s own community.

Keywords

Composite history Oral tradition Multidisciplinary approach Ethnohistory Preliterate communities Source materials Phratry Matrimonial relations 

References

  1. Barpujari, H.K. 1980. Ethnohistory. In First Proceedings of the North East India History Association (NEIHA). Shillong: NEIHA.Google Scholar
  2. Beresford, W.G. 1881. Notes on the North-Eastern Frontier of Assam. Shillong.Google Scholar
  3. Bhuyan, S.K. 1990. Anglo-Assamese relations 1771–1826. 3rd ed. Guwahati: Lawyer’s Book Stall.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, John. 1874. A sketch of Assam with some account of the hill tribes, by an Officer, 52–53. London: Smith Elder& Co.Google Scholar
  5. Cohn, B.S. 1968. Ethnohistory. In International encyclopaedia of social sciences, ed. David L. Sills, vol. 5&6, 440–441. New York: The Macmillan Company & The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Elwin, Verrier. 1958. Myths of the North-East Frontier. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1959. India’s North-East Frontier in the nineteenth century. Madras: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fenton, N. William. 1962. Ethnohistory and its problems. Ethnohistory 9 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fontana, L.Bernard. 1961. What is Ethnohistory? Arizoniana 2 (1): 9–11.Google Scholar
  10. Lurie, O. Nancy. 1961. Ethnohistory: An ethnological point of view. Ethnohistory 8 (1): 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mackenzie, Alexander. 1989. The North-East Frontier of India, Reprinted in India. Delhi: Mittal Publications.Google Scholar
  12. McBryde, Isabel. 1979. Ethnohistory in an Australian context: Independent discipline or convenient data quarry? Aboriginal History 3 (1/2): 128–151.Google Scholar
  13. Raikar, Y.A., and S. Chatterjee. 1980. Archaeology in Arunachal Pradesh. Shillong: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
  14. Robinson, William. 1851. Notes on the Daphlas and the Peculiarities of their Languages. JASB XX.Google Scholar
  15. Rowlatt, E.A. 1845. Report of an expedition into the Mishmi Hills to the North East of Sudeyah. JASB XIV: 488f.Google Scholar
  16. Trigger, G. Bruce. 1982. Ethnohistory: Problems and prospects. Ethnohistory 29 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Voegelin, W. Erminie. 1954. An Ethnohistorian’s viewpoint. Ethnohistory 1 (2): 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryRajiv Gandhi UniversityDoimukh, Papum PareIndia

Personalised recommendations