Advertisement

A Pricing-Based Spectrum Leasing Framework with Adaptive Distributed Learning for Cognitive Radio Networks

  • Sara HandoufEmail author
  • Essaid Sabir
  • Mohammed Sadik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 366)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the decentralized scenario of spectrum leasing, whereby a primary user (PU) who owns the spectrum resource, may lease a part of her licensed spectrum to a secondary (SU). We propose a pricing-based spectrum leasing framework between the PU and the SU. The spectrum leasing problem can be depicted by a non-cooperative game where: on one hand, the PU plays the seller and attempts to maximize its own utility by setting the price of spectrum. On the other hand, the SU (i.e., the buyer) has to decide whether to accept the leasing offer or to decline it, while seeking to maximize her own utility. Next, we characterize the Nash equilibria of the induced game for both pure strategies and mixed mixed strategies. We also propose numerous learning algorithms that allow cognitive users to learn their optimal strategies and payoffs for both continuous and discontinuous actions. Simulation results evaluate our model and show the behaviour (accuracy and speed of convergence) of the proposed learning algorithms.

Keywords

Cognitive radio Spectrum leasing Nash equilibrium Automatic learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Habachi, O., Hayel, Y.: Optimal opportunistic sensing in cognitive radio networks. IET Communications 6(8), 797–804 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sabir, E., Haddad, M., Tembine, H.: Joint strategic spectrum sensing and opportunistic access for cognitive radio networks. In: 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1368–1373, December 3–7, 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu, X., Schwartz, H.M.: Decentralized learning in two-player zero-sum games: a LR-I lagging anchor algorithm. In: American Control Conference (ACC), 2011, San Francisco, CA, pp. 107–112 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouferda, S., Sabir, E., Hayar, A., Rifi, M.: Equilibrium sensing time for distributed opportunistic access incognitive radio networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems(MSWiM 2013). ACM, New York, pp. 229–236 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, X., Shankar, N.S.: Sensing-based opportunistic channel access. Mobile Networks and Applications 11(4), 577–591 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, X., Guan, X., Han, Q., Liu, Z., Ma, K.: A Stackelberg Game for Spectrum Leasing in Cooperative Cognitive Radio Networks. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 125–133 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vassaki, S., Poulakis, M.I., Panagopoulos, A.D., Constantinou, P.: An auction-based mechanism for spectrum leasing in overlay cognitive radio networks. In: 2013 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 2733–2737, September 8–11, 2013Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yi, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., Jiang, T., Zhang, J.: Cooperative communication-aware spectrum leasing in cognitive radio networks. In: 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum, pp. 1–11, April 6–9, 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma, K., Yang, J., Hu, G., Guan, X.: Cooperative Relay-Aware Spectrum leasing based on Nash bargaining solution in cognitive radio networks. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 28, 1250–1264 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salim, S., Baek, C., Moh, S., Chung, I.: Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Games for Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Comparative Stud. HIKARI Ltd Contemporary Engineering Sciences 7(29), 1633–1639 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stanojev, I., Simeone, O., Bar-Ness, Y., Yu, T.: Spectrum leasing via distributed cooperation in cognitive radio. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2008, pp. 3427–3431, May 19–23, 2008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feng, X., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J.: Dynamic spectrum leasing with user-determined traffic segmentation. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 6096–6100, June 9–13, 2013Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taleb, T., Anastasopoulos, M.P., Nasser, N.: An Auction-based Pareto-optimal Strategy for Dynamic and Fair Allotment of Resources in Wireless Mobile Networks. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology 60, 4587–4597 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elmachkour, M., Sabir, E., Kobbane, A., Ben-Othmane, J.: Greening the Spectrum Sensing: A Minority Game-based Mechanism Design. IEEE Communications Magazine, 150–156, December 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UBICOM Research Group, ENSEMHassan II UniversityCasablancaMorocco
  2. 2.COMSYS Research Group, ENSEMHassan II UniversityCasablancaMorocco

Personalised recommendations