Collaborative Learning through Creative Video Composition on Distributed User Interfaces

  • Aba-Sah Dadzie
  • Maximilian Müller
  • Aris Alissandrakis
  • Marcelo Milrad
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)

Abstract

We report two studies that fed into user-centred design for pedagogical and technological scaffolds for social, constructive learning through creative, collaborative, reflective video composition. The studies validated this learning approach and verified the utility and usability of an initial prototype (scaffold) built to support it. However, challenges in interaction with the target technology, multi-touch tabletops, impacted ability to carry out prescribed learning activities. Our findings point to the need to investigate an alternative approach and informed redesign of our scaffolds. We propose coupling of distributed user interfaces, using mobile devices to access large, shared displays, to augment capability to follow our constructive learning process. We discuss also the need to manage recognised challenges to collaboration with a distributed approach.

Keywords

CSCL Creative video composition Reflective knowledge construction Shared displays Distributed UIs Process support 

References

  1. 1.
    Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In Improving Student Learning: Theory and PracticeTen Years On (pp. 412–424).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Otero, N., Alissandrakis, A., Müller, M., Milrad, M., Lencastre, J. A., Casal, J., & Jośe, R. (2013). Promoting secondary school learners’ curiosity towards science through digital public displays. International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media (AcademicMindTrek), 13, pp. 204–210.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F., & Davies, M. (1997). Designing for or designing with? In-formant design for interactive learning environments. In ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’97) (pp. 343–350).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dadzie, A.S., Benton, L., Vasalou, A., & Beale, R. (2014). Situated design for creative, reflective, collaborative, technology-mediated learning. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’14) (pp. 83–92).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sousa, D. A., Pilecki, T. (2013). Why STEM should become STEAM. In From STEM to STEAM: Using Brain-Compatible Strategies to Integrate the Arts (pp. 9–35).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Derboven, J., De Roeck, D., Verstraete, M., Geerts, D., Schneider-Barnes, J., & Luyten, K. (2010). Comparing user interaction with low and high fidelity prototypes of tabletop surfaces. In 6th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (NordiCHI ’10).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lamberty, K. K., Froiland, K., Biatek, J., & Adams, S. (2010). Encouraging awareness of peers’ learning activities using large displays in the periphery. In: CHI EA ’10 extended abstracts, 28th international conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3655–3660).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuill, N., & Rogers, Y. (2012). Mechanisms for collaboration: A design and evaluation framework for multi-user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alvarez, C., Milrad, M., Borie, F., & Luna, M. (2014). Collphoto: A paper + smartphone problem solving environment for science and engineering lectures. In Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing (pp. 1–15).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates, chap. Does technology improve learning? Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alvarez, C., Alarcon, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2011). Implementing collaborative learning activities in the classroom supported by one-to-one mobile computing: A design-based process. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(11), 1961–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, C. C., Chung, C. W., Chen, N. S., & Liu, B. J. (2009). Analysis of peer interaction in learning activities with personal handhelds and shared displays. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 127–142.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (1999). Does a shared screen make a shared solution? In 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL ’99).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aba-Sah Dadzie
    • 1
  • Maximilian Müller
    • 2
  • Aris Alissandrakis
    • 2
  • Marcelo Milrad
    • 2
  1. 1.KMiThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.Department of Media TechnologyLinnaeus UniversityVäxjöSweden

Personalised recommendations