Toward a Learning Ecosystem to Support Flipped Classroom: A Conceptual Framework and Early Results

  • Michail N. Giannakos
  • John Krogstie
  • Trond Aalberg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)

Abstract

The systematic use of technologies in order to orchestrate learning has become widely employed in the past years, and diverse technologies have been applied in a variety of teaching practices, for instance, learning tools which allow you to flip the classroom or monitor other active learning practices. However, the developed systems are only a subset of different kinds of learning materials and learning tools that an educator should take into consideration, and most importantly, they do not offer an overview of the different learning dynamics. The development of a learning ecosystem framework, which will allow us to describe “the complex of living organisms” as well as their interrelationships, will help us to better understand and further develop our teaching approaches. In this paper, we present a learning ecosystem framework and the first captured results of its application. The framework incorporates basic e-learning tools and traditional learning practices, making it accessible to anyone wanting to implement a flipped classroom experience in his/her course. Its application is based on easy-to-use tools, allowing for the incorporation of any additional specificities. This work aims to provide insights for other scholars and practitioners to further validate, examine, and extend the proposed framework. This approach can be used for those interested in incorporating flipped classroom in their teaching, since it is a flexible procedure that may be adapted to meet their needs.

Keywords

Learning ecosystem Flipped classroom Learning environments Learning dynamics Active learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the students of the study who kindly contributed their time and effort. Finally, we would like to thank the Research Council of Norway for the financial support (project number: 248523/H20).

References

  1. 1.
    Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Chrisochoides, N. (2014). Reviewing the flipped classroom research: reflections for computer science education. In: Proceedings of the ACM Computer Science Education Research Conference, pp. 23–29. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Encyclopedia Britannica. (2011). Ecosystem. Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. (Eds.) Last retrieved April 21st, 2015, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/178597/ecosystem.
  4. 4.
    Krogstie, J. (2012). Modelling of digital ecosystems: Challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of 13th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, PRO-VE.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shum, S. B., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social Learning Analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 3–26.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang, V. & Guetl, C. (2007). E-learning ecosystem (ELEs)-a holistic approach for the development of more effective learning environment for small-and-medium sized enterprises (SMEs). In: Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference, pp. 420–425. New York: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siemens, G. (2015). Learning ecology, communities, and networks—Extending the classroom. elearnspace, last retrieved April 21st, 2015, http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/learning_communities.htm.
  8. 8.
    Giannakos, M. N., Chorianopoulos, K., & Chrisochoides, N. (2015). Making sense of video analytics: Lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), 16(1), 260–283.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). An architecture for extending the learning analytics support in the Khan Academy framework. In: International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 277–284, New York City: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, H., Almeroth, K., Knight, A., Bulger, M., & Mayer, R. (2010). Moodog: Tracking Students’ Online Learning Activities. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 407–429.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, A. I., Øfsdahl, T., & Mørch-Storstein, O. K. (2008). An evaluation of a mobile game concept for lectures. In: Software engineering education and training (pp. 197–204). New York: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48(2), 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kwok, L. F. (2015). A vision for the development of i-campus. Smart Learning Environments, 2, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michail N. Giannakos
    • 1
  • John Krogstie
    • 1
  • Trond Aalberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations