Advertisement

Concluding Remarks

  • Peter Kien-hong YU
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of writing this chapter is to highlight the main points of this book. First, from the first word in the title of this book to the last word, everything has been presented logically. It can be done because dialectics in general or the one-dot theory and along with it, for example, a series of crab and frog motion models in particular can help us to rationalize everything systematically and coherently, while non-“dialectics” sooner or later will face contradictions of one kind or another, which can be defined as something that cannot be described and explained, if not inferred or predicted, logically, systematically, and coherently.

Keywords

Main points Findings Comparison Contrast Contribution 

References

  1. Paasi, A. (2011). Border theory: An unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars? In D Wastl-Walter (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies (pp. 11–32, 12). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  2. Roe, M. (2012). Maritime governance and policy-making. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Severino, R. C. (2010). ASEAN and the South China sea. Security Challenges, 6(2), 37–47.Google Scholar
  4. Shambaugh, D. L. (March 2015) “The Coming Chinese Crack up,” Wall Street Journal. Google Scholar
  5. Song, Y., & Keyuan, Z. O. U. (Eds.). (2014). Major law and policy issues in the South China sea: European and American perspectives. London: Ashgate Publishing. Google Scholar
  6. Steinberg, P. E. (2001). The social construction of the ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  7. Susskind, L. (1994). Environmental diplomacy: Negotiating more effective global agreements. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  8. Symmons, C. R. (2008). Historic waters in the law of the sea: A modern re-appraisal. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Google Scholar
  9. Talmon, S., & Bing Bing, J. I. A. (Eds.). (2014). The South China sea arbitration: A Chinese perspective. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar
  10. Tanaka, Y. (2008). A dual approach to ocean governance: The Cases of zonal and integrated management in international law of the sea. U.K.: Ashgate Publishing. Google Scholar
  11. Tanaka, Y. (2012). The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  12. Thang, N.-D., & Thao, N. H. (2014). China’s nine dotted line in the South China Sea. Ocean Development & International Law, 43(1), 35–56. Google Scholar
  13. Unger, J. M. (2003). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press. Google Scholar
  14. Vairon, L. (2013). China threat? New York: CN Times Books. Google Scholar
  15. Valencia, M. J. (1996). A maritime regime for north-east Asia. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  16. Vallega, A. (2001). Sustainable ocean governance. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  17. van Houtum, H. (2011). The mask of the border. In D. Wastl-Walter (Ed.), The ashgate research companion to border studies (pp. 49–62). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Google Scholar
  18. Vogler, J. (1995). The global commons: A regime analysis. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  19. Wang, H., & French, E. (January 2013). China’s participation in global governance from a comparative perspective. Asia Policy, (15), 89–114. Google Scholar
  20. Wei, Y. (1997). From multi-system nations’ to linkage communities. Issues and Studies (Taipei), 33(10), 1–19. Google Scholar
  21. Weinberg, S. (1977). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the universe. London: Fontana Paperbacks. Google Scholar
  22. Weisman, A. (2007). The world without us. New York: Picador. Google Scholar
  23. Wettestad, J. (1999). Designing effective environmental regimes: The key conditions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
  24. Williams, M. (1994). International organizations and the third world. New York: Harvester and Wheatsheaf. Google Scholar
  25. Wu, S. (2000). Three thoughts about international regimes. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, (16), 47–70. XIE, C. (2012). Governing China: How the cpc works. Beijing: New World Press. Google Scholar
  26. Young, O. R. (1989). International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
  27. Young, O. R. (1998). Creating regimes: Arctic accords and international governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
  28. Young, O. R., et al. (May 2007). Solving the crisis in oceanic governance: Place-based management of marine ecosystems. Environment, 49(4), 20–32. Google Scholar
  29. Yu, D. C. Y. (September 2013). The international regimes and non-international regimes dimensions of the cross-strait search and rescue joint exercise: A one-dot theory interpretation, master thesis, National Quemoy University. Google Scholar
  30. Yu, P. K. (2006). Beijing Versus Taipei under the ‘One China’ principle: A dialectical and scientific analysis. In K. L. Ho & K. C. Hou (Eds.), Ensuring interests: China-Taiwan relations and Southeast Asia (pp. 45–76). Kuala Lumpur: Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya. Google Scholar
  31. Yu, P. K. (1991–1992). Issues on the South China sea: A case study. Chinese Yearbook on International Law and Affairs (U.S.A.), (11), 138–200. Google Scholar
  32. Yu, P. K. (2000). The dialectical relationship of the Chinese communist party and the PLA. Defense Analysis, 16(2), 203–217. Google Scholar
  33. Yu, P. K. (2002). The crab and frog motion paradigm shift: Decoding and deciphering Taipei and Beijing's dialectical politics. Lanham: University Press of America. Google Scholar
  34. Yu, P. K. (2003). The Chinese (Broken) U-shaped line in the South China sea: Points, lines, and zone. Journal of Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(3), 405–430. Google Scholar
  35. Yu, P. K. (2005a). Hu Jintao and the ascendancy of China: A dialectical study. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International Academic Publishing. Google Scholar
  36. Yu, P. K. (2005b). Solving and resolving the East China sea dispute: Beijing’s options. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, XVII, 3, 105–127. Google Scholar
  37. Yu, P. K. (2007). Setting up international (adversary) regimes in the South China sea: Analyzing the obstacles from a chinese perspective. Ocean Development & International Law (Canada), 38(1–2), 147–156. Google Scholar
  38. Yu, P. K. (2012a). International governance and regimes. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  39. Yu, P. K. (2012b). One-dot theory, described, explained, inferred, justified, and applied. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Yu, P. K-H. (2012). One-dot theory described, explained, inferred, justified, and applied. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Quemoy UniversityJinmen CountyChina

Personalised recommendations