Advertisement

The Chinese U-Shaped Line: A Dialectically Presented Sample

  • Peter Kien-hong YU
Chapter

Abstract

Many, if not most, academics and experts in the East and West are not aware that the mainstream Chinese (Communist) thinking has been dialectical, since ancient times. In this chapter, the author applied five interrelated diagrams (or 1 + 4, with 1 referring to the grand diagram and 4, small diagrams) to describe, explain, and infer the U-shaped line in the South China Sea (SCS), in which both Taiwan and mainland China are saying that virtually all that belt of sea or body of waters (as opposed to maritime commons, to some academics and experts) are theirs.

Keywords

South China Sea Mainland China Taiwan U-shaped line Dialectics 

References

  1. Byers, M. (2009). Who owns the arctic? Understanding sovereignty disputes in the north. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, K. C. (1992). The Nansha sovereignty belongs to whom? ShiJieRiBao (World Journal) (hereinafter SJRB) (New York), 3.Google Scholar
  3. Chircop, A., McDorman, T. L., & Rolston S. J. (Eds.). (2009). The future of ocean regime-building. Leiden: Martins Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denmark, A. M., & Mulvenon, J. C. (2003). Command the commons: The military foundation of U.S. hegemony. International Security, 28(1), 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Djalal, H. (2000). South China Sea island dispute. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology Supplements, 8(2000), 9–21.Google Scholar
  6. Dutton, P. A. (2011). An analysis of China’s claim to historic rights in the South China Sea. Paper presented to the international conference, major law and policy issues in the South China Sea: European and American Perspectives, p. 15, dated October 7–8, 2011. Sponsored by the Institute of European and American Studies and Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies, Academia Sinica, Taipei.Google Scholar
  7. Fu, K.-C. (1995). Legal status of the South (China) Sea (p. 3). Taipei: 123 Information Company.Google Scholar
  8. Krasner, S. D. (1985). Structural conflict: The third world against global liberalism (p. 227). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. MacEachern, A. (2010). J. E. Bernier’s claims to fame. Scientia Canadensis, 33(2), 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McDougall, D. (1997). The international politics of the New Asia Pacific, (p. 221). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  11. Severino, R. C. (2010). ASEAN and the South China Sea. Security Challenges, 6(2), 37–47.Google Scholar
  12. YU, P. K.-H. (1991–1992). Issues on the South China Sea: A case study. Chinese Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, 11, 138–200Google Scholar
  13. YU, P. K.-H. (2003). The chinese (broken) U-shaped line in the South China Sea: Points, lines, and zones. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(3), 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Quemoy UniversityJinmen CountyChina

Personalised recommendations