Issues and Challenges of Enacting Game-Based Learning in Schools

Chapter

Abstract

In this article, we postulate the issues and challenges when we bring game-based learning from an informal setting to a formal school setting. The understanding will contribute to the design of game-based learning programs in the mainstream classrooms. We highlight the issues and challenges by re-situating a successful game-based learning program designed to foster problem solving and argumentation—Mad City Mystery—from an outdoor learning setting to a school setting. We first delineate the conditions and mechanisms through which Mad City Mystery was made possible as a plausible twenty-first-century learning experience. Through the analysis, we unpack the enablers and critical conditions that made Mad City Mystery a plausible twenty-first-century learning experience. From there, we examine the plausibility and applicability of these critical conditions in the classroom context. In conclusion, we articulate eight critical challenges/enablers that sustain game-based learning programs like Mad City Mystery in the classroom. Among the challenges, pedagogical, technological, and logistical issues are Grade Two challenges—issues that can be solved when research and financial resources are in place and are more likely to be solved. Curricular, performative, social, and temporal issues are Grade One challenges—which are more resilient to changes even when external resources pour in.

Keywords

ICT integration Game-based learning Augmented reality games 21st century competencies Argumentation 

References

  1. Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. S., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play: Using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dewey, J. (2013). The school and society and the child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games + good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning and literacy. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Jan, M. (2009). Designing an augmented reality game-based curriculum for argumentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  8. Jan, M., Chee, Y. S., & Tan, E. M. (2010). Learning science via a science-in-the-making process: The design of a game-based learning curriculum. In S. Martin (Ed.), iVERG 2010 proceedings – International conference on immersive technologies for learning: A multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 13–25). Stockton: Iverg Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. In Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on Wireless and mobile technologies in education, 2002 (pp. 95–98). Los Alamitos: IEEE.Google Scholar
  10. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  13. Millstone, J. (2012, May). Teacher attitudes about digital games in the classroom. In The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. Retrieved from http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/images/presentation/jgcc_teacher_survey.pdf
  14. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Robinson, K. (2006, February). Do schools kill creativity. In Presentation at TED 2006 conference, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Shaffer, D. W., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Before every child is left behind: How epistemic games can solve the coming crisis in education (WCER Working Paper No. 2005-7). University of Wisconsin-Madison. Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Available from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2005_7.pdf . Accessed 17 July 2012.
  17. Squire, K. D. (2006). From content to context: Video games as designed experiences. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad City Mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Squire, K., Jan, M., Mathews, J., Wagler, M., Martin, J., DeVane, B., et al. (2007). Wherever you go, there you are: Place-based augmented reality games for learning. In B. E. Shelton & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), The educational design and use of simulation computer games (pp. 265–296). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Tyack, D. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Learning and InstructionNational Central UniversityTaoyuan CityTaiwan
  2. 2.English Language Institute of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations