Advertisement

Maximizing the Benefit of Technology for Language Learning

  • Alexander Seeshing YeungEmail author
  • Zhu Chen
  • Bingyi Li
Chapter

Abstract

With the advent of the information age, technology has been used for an ever-increasing range of purposes in people’s everyday lives. Reflecting this trend, policymakers have devoted significant amounts of resources to promote the use of technology for teaching almost all school subjects. However, the impact of the use of technology on language learning is controversial. Some teachers and students may still prefer traditional language-teaching and -learning styles despite ready access to technology and requirements from authorities. Hence, it is people instead of physical facilities that allow the benefits of technology to actually materialize in language learning. This chapter investigates how technology can be utilized to its full potential for language-learning purposes and how to overcome obstructive factors related to current technology use. Several implications are considered. Firstly, it is important for teachers to ensure that technology use does not detract teaching from the learning objectives. Secondly, for language assessment, both technological and non-technological approaches may be useful depending on the desired outcome. Thirdly, subject-specific professional training in technology application should be highlighted as a priority for teacher education. Furthermore, professional training needs to address psychological factors, such as enhancing teachers’ self-concepts so that they feel confident in using a variety of technologies to promote students’ language learning. By promoting their interest, and the value they attach to using technologies, they would engage more in sustainable technology applications and self-initiated further professional learning in that respect.

Keywords

Technology Motivation Language learning Teacher Teaching 

References

  1. Abraham, L. B., & Williams, L. (Eds.). (2009). Electronic discourse in language learning and language teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, R. (2000). Framing and design in ICT in English: Towards a new subject and practices in the classroom. In A. Goodwyn (Ed.), English in the digital age: Information and communications technology and the teaching of English (pp. 22–33). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  3. Anyan, J., Owens, C., & Magoun, D. (2000). The effects of technology on the attitudes of classroom teachers (E-TACT). In D. Willis, J. Price, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2000 (pp 1528–1533). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012a). Australian curriculum: Languages foundation to year 10 draft preamble, rationale, aims and organisation. Sydney: ACARA.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012b). Draft Australian curriculum: Technologies. Retrieved from http://consultation.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Static/docs/Technologies/Draft%20Australian%20Curriculum%20Technologies%20-%20February%202013.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2012.
  6. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012c). Information and communication technology (ICT) capability. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/GeneralCapabilities/Pdf/ICT. Accessed 12 Dec 2012.
  7. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2013). General capabilities. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/English/General-capabilities. Accessed 11 Oct 2013.
  8. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 51.Google Scholar
  9. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(2), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 17–28.Google Scholar
  12. Chapelle, C. A. (2008). Utilizing technology in language assessment. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Language testing and assessment. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Cogill, J. (2003). The use of interactive whiteboards in the primary school: Effects on pedagogy—A case study of policy and expert practice from English. ICT Research Bursaries, 46(1), 52–55.Google Scholar
  14. Colley, A. M. (2003). Gender differences in adolescents’ perceptions of the best and worst aspects of computing at school. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 673–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper, B. (2003). The Ripple Project: The whole school impact of conducting learner-centred ICT projects in infant classrooms—A case study of policy and expert practice from England. ICT Research Bursaries, 46(1), 45–51.Google Scholar
  16. Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2008). International best practice in effective educational interventions: Why self-concept matters and examples from bullying, peer support, and reading research. In D. M. McInerney, V. E. Shawn, & M. Dowson (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning. Vol. 8: Teaching and learning: International best practice (pp. 267–294). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  17. Davison, I., & Pratt, D. (2003). The use of interactive whiteboards in the primary school: Effects on pedagogy—A case study of policy and expert practice from English. ICT Research Bursaries, 46(1), 29–33.Google Scholar
  18. Education Commission, Hong Kong (2000). Education blueprint for the 21st century: Learning for life, learning through life—Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Education Commission.Google Scholar
  19. Goodison, T. (2002). Enhancing learning with ICT at primary level. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodwyn, A., & Findlay, K. (2003). ICT and subject literacies: A study of the relationship between ICT and subject literacies in the secondary school. ICT Research Bursaries, 26–28.Google Scholar
  21. Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris, B. (2011). Writing in schools with computers: What does it take to make it happen? English in Australia, 46(1), 40–51.Google Scholar
  23. Hawkridge, D. (1990). Who needs computers in school, and why? Computers and Education, 15, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivers, K. S. (2003). A teacher’s guide to using technology in the classroom (2nd ed.). Westport: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  26. Kirschner, P., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2008). Benchmarks for teacher education programs in the pedagogical use of ICT. International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 435–447). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meelissen, M. R., & Drent, M. (2008). Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(3), 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murphy, I. (2011). Educational reform and the enacted curriculum in English—A narrative from the field of the digital education revolution. English in Australia, 46(1), 62–72.Google Scholar
  30. New South Wales Department of Education and Communities (NSW DEC) (2010). Connected classrooms program in action. Retrieved from http://www.dec.nsw.gov.au/detresources/ccp_in_action_compendium_FNOouLXKim.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2013
  31. New South Wales Department of Education and Communities (NSW DEC) (2011). New interactive whiteboards announced. Retrieved from http://www.dec.nsw.gov.au/about-us/news-at-det/news/new-interactive-whiteboards-announced. Accessed 11 Oct 2013.
  32. O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with “failed communication” in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623–642.Google Scholar
  33. O’Mahony, C. (2003). Making IT happen: Patterns of ICT use among a group of UK school staff. ICT Research Bursaries, 46(1), 34–49.Google Scholar
  34. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2007). Information, media and technology skills. Route 21. Washington: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from http://route21.p21.org/?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=8. Accessed 15 Oct 2013.
  35. Pena, M., & Yeung, A. S. (2010). Satisfaction with online learning: Does students’ computer competence matter? International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 6, 97–108.Google Scholar
  36. Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rogers, L. (2002). Learning science with ICT: How do teachers make a difference? The CeNTRE seminar series on the relationship between ICT and specific subject disciplines. Coventry: University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  38. Shapka, J. D., & Ferrari, M. (2003). Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19(3), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sipilä, K. (2010). The impact of laptop provision on teacher attitudes towards ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veen, W. (1993) How teachers use computers in instructional practice: Four case studies in a Dutch secondary school. Computers and Education, 21(1/2), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.Google Scholar
  43. Yeung, A. S., Lim, K. M., Tay, E. G., Lam-Chiang, A. C., & Hui, C. (2012a). Relating use of digital technology by pre-service teachers to confidence: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8), 1317–1332.Google Scholar
  44. Yeung, A. S., Taylor, P. G., Hui, C., Lam-Chiang, A. C., & Low, E. -L. (2012b). Mandatory use of technology in teaching: Who cares and so what? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 859–870.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityStrathfieldAustralia
  2. 2.University of Western SydneyParramattaAustralia

Personalised recommendations