The Embattled Religiosity of Religious Fundamentalism

  • Kumar Ramakrishna
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter addresses two questions. First, why does religion seem to be so ubiquitous and how feasible is it for humankind to totally secularize, as atheistic commentators are increasingly urging? Second, despite its undoubted capacity for promoting good, is religion nevertheless inherently if counterintuitively prone to violence? The chapter first explores the various reasons that have been offered for the persistence of religion across human societies. Employing evolutionist insights, the chapter shows that while at an individual level, religion is inevitable given the way human brains are constituted, at the group level, religion may well be considered as a complex adaptation that enhances the internal cohesion needed for success in competition and conflict with relevant out-groups. Moreover, while religiosity is a hardwired instinct, religion and religious fundamentalism are in fact cultural artifacts. In short, religion and more specifically religious fundamentalism represent channeled or canalized expressions of the innate religiosity of human beings. The chapter argues that religious fundamentalism represents the fusion of the highly tuned Manichean Mindset with a group religiosity marked by a sense of existential threat. While religious fundamentalism certainly does not ipso facto lead to intergroup violence, it unequivocally possesses violent potentials. Hence the chapter posits that it is not innate religiosity or the cultural product of religion per se that is the problem. Rather it is the defensive, embattled, constricted religiosity of religious fundamentalism that ultimately leads – in conjunction with other intervening factors to be explored – toward religious violence.

Keywords

Religion Religiosity Religious fundamentalism Manichean Mindset Religious violence Complex adaptation Violent potentials Intergroup violence 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akyol, M. (2011). Islam without extremes: A Muslim case for liberty. London/New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Alcorta, C. S. (2010, April 29). Biology, culture, and religiously motivated suicide terrorism: An evolutionary perspective. Politics and Culture. http://www.politicsandculture.org/2010/04/29/biology-culture-and-religiously-motivated-suicide-terrorism-an-evolutionary-perspective/. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  3. Ali, A. H. (2013). Raised on hatred. New Perspectives Quarterly, 30(2), 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allport, G. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 448–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almond, G. A., Appleby, R. S., & Sivan, E. (2003). Strong religion: The rise of fundamentalisms around the world. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Alper, M. (2006). The “god” part of the brain: A scientific interpretation of human spirituality and god. Naperville: Sourcebooks.Google Scholar
  7. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armstrong, K. (2001). The battle for god: Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  9. Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bering, J. (2013). The god instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
  11. Berreby, D. (2005). Us and them: Understanding your tribal mind. New York/Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  12. Blackmore, S. (2006). Memetics by another name? Review of P. J. Richerson & R. Boyd, Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Bioscience, 56, 74–75.Google Scholar
  13. Bloom, H. (1997). The Lucifer principle: A scientific expedition into the forces of history. New York: Atlantic Monthly.Google Scholar
  14. Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Brodie, R. (2009). Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. London/New York: Hay House.Google Scholar
  16. Chirot, D., & McCauley, C. (2010). Why not kill them all? The logic and prevention of mass political murder. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press. With a new preface by the authors.Google Scholar
  17. Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. (2011). Connected: The amazing power of social networks and how they shape our lives. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar
  18. Crabtree, S. (2010, August 31). Religiosity highest in world’s poorest nations: United States is among rich countries that buck the trend. Gallup World. http://www.gallup.com/poll/142727/religiosity-highest-world-poorest-nations.aspx. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  19. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Deikman, A. J. (2003). Them and us: Cult thinking and the terrorist threat. Berkeley: Bay Tree Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Dowd, M. (2009). Thank god for evolution: How the marriage of science and religion will transform your life and our world. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  22. Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2005). The evolution of evil. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 102–123). New York/London: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Erikson, E. H. (1994). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York/London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Esslemont, T. (2011, August 26). Spirituality in Estonia – the world’s ‘least religious’ country. BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14635021. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  25. Finkel, D. N., Swartout, P., & Sosis, R. (2009). The socio-religious brain: A developmental model. Proceedings of the British Academy, 158, 287–312.Google Scholar
  26. Foreign Policy: Special Issue – 100 Top Global Thinkers of 2009. (December 2009). Bill Clinton’s World.Google Scholar
  27. Gladigau, K., & West, B. (2007). Religious affiliation and moral conservatism in Australia and South Australia. Flinders Social Monitor. No. 8. http://smpf.flinders.edu.au/docs/No8%20Apr%2007.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2014.
  28. Hamer, D. (2004). The god gene: How faith is hardwired into our genes. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  29. Harman, O. (2011). The price of altruism: George Price and the search for the origins of human kindness. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, S. (2005). The end of faith: Religion, terror and the future of reason. London: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hedges, C. (2008). When atheism becomes religion: America’s new fundamentalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Herriott, P. (2007). Religious fundamentalism and social identity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Hill, D. (2010). Fundamentalist faith states: Regulation theory as a framework for the psychology of religious fundamentalism. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 80–88). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. James, C. A. (2010). The religion virus: Why we believe in god – an evolutionist explains religion’s incredible hold on humanity. Hants, UK: O Books.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Jones, J. W. (2008). Blood that cries out from the earth: The psychology of religious terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, J. W. (2010). Conclusion: A fundamentalist mindset? In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 216–220). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kosmin, B. A., & Keysar, A. (2009). American religious identification survey 2008 summary report. Hartford: Trinity College.Google Scholar
  39. Liddle, J. R., Bush, L. S., & Shackelford, T. (2011). An introduction to evolutionary psychology and its application to suicide terrorism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 3(3), 176–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metcalf, B. D. (2002). ‘Traditionalist’ Islamic activism: Deoband, tablighis, and talibs. Leiden: International Institute for the Study of Islam in the Modern World.Google Scholar
  41. Micklethwait, J., & Wooldridge, A. (2010). God is back: How the global revival of faith is changing the world. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Nasir, K. A., Pereira, A. A., & Turner, B. S. (2010). Muslims in Singapore: Piety, politics and policies. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Newberg, A., & Waldman, M. R. (2006). Why we believe what we believe: Uncovering our biological need for meaning, spirituality and truth. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pratt, D. (2010). Religion and terrorism: Christian fundamentalism and extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(3), 438–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Purzycki, B. G., & Sosis, R. (2010). Religious concepts as necessary components of the adaptive religious system. In U. Frey (Ed.), The nature of god: Evolution and religion (pp. 37–59). Marburg: Tectum Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Rapoport, D. C. (2001). The fourth wave: September 11 in the history of terrorism. Current History, 100, 419–424.Google Scholar
  47. Ramakrishna, K. (2009). Radical pathways: Understanding Muslim radicalization in Indonesia. Westport/London: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  48. Razzaque, R. (2008). Human being to human bomb: Inside the mind of a terrorist. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  49. Ridley, M. (2004). The agile gene: How nature turns on nurture. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
  50. Ruthven, M. (2007). Fundamentalism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Savage, S. (2011). Four lessons from the study of fundamentalism and the psychology of religion. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shermer, M. (2003). How we believe: Science, skepticism and the search for god (2nd ed.). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  53. Shermer, M. (2004). The science of good and evil: Why people cheat, gossip, care, share, and follow the golden rule. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  54. Shermer, M. (2011). The believing brain: From spiritual faiths to political convictions – How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
  55. Sim, S. (2004). Fundamentalist world: The new dark age of dogma. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  56. Social Values, Science and Technology. (2005) Special Eurobarometer. 225. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  57. Sosis, R. (2009). The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2008). Militants and Martyrs: Evolutionary perspectives on religion and terrorism. In R. D. Sagarin & T. Taylor (Eds.), Natural security: A Darwinian approach to a dangerous world (pp. 105–124). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. Stark, R. (2007). Discovering god: The origins of the great religions and the evolution of belief. New York: Harper One.Google Scholar
  61. Strozier, C. B. (2010). The apocalyptic other. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 62–70). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strozier, C. B., & Boyd, K. A. (2010). Definitions and dualisms. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 11–15). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Strozier, C. B., & Terman, D. M. (2010). Introduction. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 3–7). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Strozier, C. B., Boyd, K. A., & Jones, J. W. (2010). The charismatic leader and the totalism of conversion. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 38–43). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taylor, M., & Horgan, J. (2001). The psychological and behavioural bases of Islamic fundamentalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(4), 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Teehan, J. (2010). In the name of god: the evolutionary origins of religious ethics and violence. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Terman, D. M. (2010). Fundamentalism and the paranoid gestalt. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 47–61). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster. With a New Afterword by the Author.Google Scholar
  69. Waller, J. (2005). Becoming evil: How ordinary people commit genocide and mass killing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Whitehouse, H. (2000). Arguments and icons: Divergent modes of religiosity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion and the nature of society. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wolpert, L. (2006). Six impossible things before breakfast: The evolutionary origins of belief. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  73. Wright, R. (2000). Nonzero: The logic of human destiny. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  74. Wright, R. (2009). The evolution of god. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kumar Ramakrishna
    • 1
  1. 1.S. Rajaratnam School of International StudiesNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations