Advertisement

Turning Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Social

  • Jill Adler
Chapter

Abstract

I will develop and then reflect on two inter-related claims in this chapter. The first is that the sets of concepts that have emerged through research on mathematics knowledge for teaching (MKT), while relatively recent, have nevertheless proliferated. This is not surprising given that as part of educational knowledge, it is part of a horizontal knowledge structure with a relatively weak grammar (Bernstein, Br J Sociol Educ 20(2):157–173, 1999). The second is that a key ‘new’ position producing and produced by this knowledge development is that of mathematics-teacher-educator-researcher working simultaneously as knowledge producer and recontextualiser in the university. A number of questions, about research and practice emerge from the grammar of MKT and the dual, perhaps ambiguous positioning of its agents. This chapter thus offers a story about mathematical knowledge for teaching framed by Steve Lerman’s contributions to the field, and the possibilities evoked for further work.

Keywords

Teacher Education Mathematics Education Mathematics Teacher Pedagogic Content Knowledge Mathematical Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This paper forms part of the work of the Wits Maths Connect Project at the University of the Witwatersrand, supported by the FirstRand Foundation Mathematics Education Chairs Initiative of the First Rand Foundation the Department of Science and Technology and the National Research Foundation (NRF). Any opinion, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the FRF, DST, or NRF.

References

  1. Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 270–296.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2011). Modelling teaching in mathematics teacher education and the constitution of mathematics for teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 139–160). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, J., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2012). Recontexualising items that measure mathematical knowledge for teaching into scenario based interviews: An investigation. Journal of Education, 56, 1–12.Google Scholar
  4. Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotna, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 359–381. doi: 10.1007/s10649-005-5072-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adler, J., Hossain, S., Stevenson, M., & Clarke, J. (2014). Mathematics for teaching and deep subject knowledge: Voices of Mathematics Enhancement Course students in England. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000a). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000b). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. Phillip (Ed.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, constructivism in education (pp. 193–224). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ball, D., Bass, H., & Hill, H. (2004). Knowing and using mathematical knowledge in teaching: Learning what matters. In A. Buffler & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Proceeding of the 12th annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 51–65). Durban: SAARSMTE.Google Scholar
  9. Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, B. (2011). Mathematics teachers’ subtle, complex disciplinary knowledge. Science, 332(6037), 1506–1507. doi: 10.1126/science.1193541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graven, M. (2002). Mathematics teacher learning, communities of practice, and the centrality of confidence. PhD, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, H. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, H., Ball, D., Sleep, L., & Lewis, J. (2007a). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts? In F. Lester (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 111–155). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Hill, H., Dean, C., & Goffney, I. (2007b). Assessing elemental and structural validity: Data from teachers, non-teachers, and mathematicians. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 5(2–3), 81–92. doi: 10.1080/15366360701486999.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, H., Blunk, M., Charalambos, Y., Lewis, J., Phelps, G., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huillet, D., Adler, J., & Berger, M. (2011). Teachers as researchers: Placing mathematics at the core. Education as Change, 15(1), 17–32. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.580769
  20. Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lemke, J. (1993). Talking science: Language learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  22. Lerman, S. (2006). Theories of mathematics education: Is plurality a problem? Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(1), 8–13. doi: 10.1007/bf02655902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lerman, S. (2014). Mapping the effects of policy on mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 187–201.Google Scholar
  24. Lerman, S., Xu, G., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2002). Developing theories of mathematics education research: The ESM story. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1–2), 23–40. doi: 10.1023/a:1022412318413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Maton, K., & Muller, J. (2007). A sociology for the transmission of knowledges. In F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 14–33). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  27. Parker, D. (2009). The specialisation of pecgogic identities in initial mathematics teacher education in post-apartheid South Africa. PhD, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  28. Parker, D., & Adler, J. (2005). Constraint or catalyst: The regulation of teacher education in South Africa. Journal of Education, 36, 59–78.Google Scholar
  29. Parker, D., & Adler, J. (2014). Sociological tools in the study of knowledge and practice in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 203–219.Google Scholar
  30. Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281. doi: 10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations